树菌根关联决定生物多样性、大树和环境因素如何驱动温带森林的地上碳储量

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Yue Chen , Zikun Mao , Jonathan A. Myers , Jinghua Yu , Xugao Wang
{"title":"树菌根关联决定生物多样性、大树和环境因素如何驱动温带森林的地上碳储量","authors":"Yue Chen ,&nbsp;Zikun Mao ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Myers ,&nbsp;Jinghua Yu ,&nbsp;Xugao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodiversity, large trees, and environmental conditions such as climate and soil have important effects on forest carbon stocks. However, recent studies in temperate forests suggest that the relative importance of these factors depends on tree mycorrhizal associations, whereby large-tree effects may be driven by ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees, diversity effects may be driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees, and environment effects may depend on differential climate and soil preferences of AM and EM trees. To test this hypothesis, we used forest-inventory data consisting of over 80,000 trees from 631 temperate-forest plots (30 m ​× ​30 ​m) across Northeast China to examine how biodiversity (species diversity and ecological uniqueness), large trees (top 1% of tree diameters), and environmental factors (climate and soil nutrients) differently regulate aboveground carbon stocks of AM trees, EM trees, and AM and EM trees combined (i.e. total aboveground carbon stock). We found that large trees had a positive effect on both AM and EM tree carbon stocks. However, biodiversity and environmental factors had opposite effects on AM vs. EM tree carbon stocks. Specifically, the two components of biodiversity had positive effects on AM tree carbon stocks, but negative effects on EM tree carbon stocks. Environmental heterogeneity (mean annual temperature and soil nutrients) also exhibited contrasting effects on AM and EM tree carbon stocks. Consequently, for the total carbon stock, the positive large-tree effect far surpasses the diversity and environment effect. This is mainly because when integrating AM and EM tree carbon stock into total carbon stock, the opposite diversity-effect (also environment-effect) on AM vs. EM tree carbon stock counteracts each other while the consistent positive large-tree effect on AM and EM tree carbon stock is amplified. In summary, this study emphasized a mycorrhizal viewpoint to better understand the determinants of overarching aboveground carbon profile across regional forests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411/pdfft?md5=349f3edcad5d7d48f4496576cadd177c&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000411-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tree mycorrhizal associations determine how biodiversity, large trees, and environmental factors drive aboveground carbon stock in temperate forests\",\"authors\":\"Yue Chen ,&nbsp;Zikun Mao ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Myers ,&nbsp;Jinghua Yu ,&nbsp;Xugao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Biodiversity, large trees, and environmental conditions such as climate and soil have important effects on forest carbon stocks. However, recent studies in temperate forests suggest that the relative importance of these factors depends on tree mycorrhizal associations, whereby large-tree effects may be driven by ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees, diversity effects may be driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees, and environment effects may depend on differential climate and soil preferences of AM and EM trees. To test this hypothesis, we used forest-inventory data consisting of over 80,000 trees from 631 temperate-forest plots (30 m ​× ​30 ​m) across Northeast China to examine how biodiversity (species diversity and ecological uniqueness), large trees (top 1% of tree diameters), and environmental factors (climate and soil nutrients) differently regulate aboveground carbon stocks of AM trees, EM trees, and AM and EM trees combined (i.e. total aboveground carbon stock). We found that large trees had a positive effect on both AM and EM tree carbon stocks. However, biodiversity and environmental factors had opposite effects on AM vs. EM tree carbon stocks. Specifically, the two components of biodiversity had positive effects on AM tree carbon stocks, but negative effects on EM tree carbon stocks. Environmental heterogeneity (mean annual temperature and soil nutrients) also exhibited contrasting effects on AM and EM tree carbon stocks. Consequently, for the total carbon stock, the positive large-tree effect far surpasses the diversity and environment effect. This is mainly because when integrating AM and EM tree carbon stock into total carbon stock, the opposite diversity-effect (also environment-effect) on AM vs. EM tree carbon stock counteracts each other while the consistent positive large-tree effect on AM and EM tree carbon stock is amplified. In summary, this study emphasized a mycorrhizal viewpoint to better understand the determinants of overarching aboveground carbon profile across regional forests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411/pdfft?md5=349f3edcad5d7d48f4496576cadd177c&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000411-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物多样性、大树以及气候和土壤等环境条件对森林碳储量有重要影响。然而,最近对温带森林的研究表明,这些因素的相对重要性取决于树木的菌根关联,其中大树效应可能由外生菌根(EM)树木驱动,多样性效应可能由丛生菌根(AM)树木驱动,而环境效应可能取决于AM和EM树木对气候和土壤的不同偏好。为了验证这一假设,我们利用中国东北地区631个温带森林小区(30米×30米)的80,000多棵树木的森林资源数据,研究了生物多样性(物种多样性和生态独特性)、大树(树径前1%)和环境因素(气候和土壤养分)如何对AM树、EM树以及AM树和EM树的地上碳储量(即地上总碳储量)产生不同的调节作用。我们发现,大树对AM树和EM树的碳储量都有积极影响。然而,生物多样性和环境因素对AM树和EM树碳储量的影响却相反。具体来说,生物多样性的两个组成部分对AM树木碳储量有积极影响,但对EM树木碳储量有消极影响。环境异质性(年平均温度和土壤养分)对AM和EM树木碳储量的影响也截然不同。因此,就总碳储量而言,大树的正效应远远超过了多样性和环境效应。这主要是因为在将AM和EM树木碳储量纳入总碳储量时,AM与EM树木碳储量相反的多样性效应(也包括环境效应)相互抵消,而大树对AM和EM树木碳储量一致的正效应则被放大。总之,本研究强调从菌根的角度来更好地理解区域森林总体地上碳储量的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tree mycorrhizal associations determine how biodiversity, large trees, and environmental factors drive aboveground carbon stock in temperate forests

Biodiversity, large trees, and environmental conditions such as climate and soil have important effects on forest carbon stocks. However, recent studies in temperate forests suggest that the relative importance of these factors depends on tree mycorrhizal associations, whereby large-tree effects may be driven by ectomycorrhizal (EM) trees, diversity effects may be driven by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees, and environment effects may depend on differential climate and soil preferences of AM and EM trees. To test this hypothesis, we used forest-inventory data consisting of over 80,000 trees from 631 temperate-forest plots (30 m ​× ​30 ​m) across Northeast China to examine how biodiversity (species diversity and ecological uniqueness), large trees (top 1% of tree diameters), and environmental factors (climate and soil nutrients) differently regulate aboveground carbon stocks of AM trees, EM trees, and AM and EM trees combined (i.e. total aboveground carbon stock). We found that large trees had a positive effect on both AM and EM tree carbon stocks. However, biodiversity and environmental factors had opposite effects on AM vs. EM tree carbon stocks. Specifically, the two components of biodiversity had positive effects on AM tree carbon stocks, but negative effects on EM tree carbon stocks. Environmental heterogeneity (mean annual temperature and soil nutrients) also exhibited contrasting effects on AM and EM tree carbon stocks. Consequently, for the total carbon stock, the positive large-tree effect far surpasses the diversity and environment effect. This is mainly because when integrating AM and EM tree carbon stock into total carbon stock, the opposite diversity-effect (also environment-effect) on AM vs. EM tree carbon stock counteracts each other while the consistent positive large-tree effect on AM and EM tree carbon stock is amplified. In summary, this study emphasized a mycorrhizal viewpoint to better understand the determinants of overarching aboveground carbon profile across regional forests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信