印度肝细胞癌的系统疗法

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Vinay Jahagirdar , Kaanthi Rama , Mohammed F. Habeeb , Mithun Sharma , Padaki N. Rao , Duvvur N. Reddy , Amit G. Singal , Anand V. Kulkarni
{"title":"印度肝细胞癌的系统疗法","authors":"Vinay Jahagirdar ,&nbsp;Kaanthi Rama ,&nbsp;Mohammed F. Habeeb ,&nbsp;Mithun Sharma ,&nbsp;Padaki N. Rao ,&nbsp;Duvvur N. Reddy ,&nbsp;Amit G. Singal ,&nbsp;Anand V. Kulkarni","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in India. This review explores the epidemiological trends and the landscape of systemic therapy for HCC in the Indian context, acknowledging the recent shift in etiology from viral hepatitis to lifestyle-associated factors.</p><p>A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, including data from the Global Cancer Observatory and the Indian Council of Medical Research, along with a critical analysis of various clinical trials. The article investigates systemic therapies in-depth, discussing their mechanisms, efficacy, and adaptation to Indian healthcare framework.</p><p>Progression-free survival with a hazard ratio of ≤0.6 compared to sorafenib, overall survival of ∼16–19 months, and objective response rate of 20–30% are the defining thresholds for systemic therapy clinical trials. Systemic therapy for advanced HCC in India primarily involves the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib, with sorafenib being the most commonly used drug for a long time. Monoclonal antibodies such as ramucirumab and bevacizumab and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, are expanding treatment horizons. Lenvatinib has emerged as a cost-effective alternative, and the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Despite these advances, late-stage diagnosis and limited healthcare accessibility pose significant challenges, often relegating patients to palliative care.</p><p>Addressing HCC in India demands an integrative approach that not only encompasses advancements in systemic therapy but also targets early detection and comprehensive care models. Future strategies should focus on enhancing awareness, screening for high-risk populations, and overcoming infrastructural disparities. Ensuring the judicious use of systemic therapies within the constraints of the Indian healthcare economy is crucial. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of systemic therapeutic options and their optimal utilization will be pivotal in elevating the standard of HCC care in India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India\",\"authors\":\"Vinay Jahagirdar ,&nbsp;Kaanthi Rama ,&nbsp;Mohammed F. Habeeb ,&nbsp;Mithun Sharma ,&nbsp;Padaki N. Rao ,&nbsp;Duvvur N. Reddy ,&nbsp;Amit G. Singal ,&nbsp;Anand V. Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in India. This review explores the epidemiological trends and the landscape of systemic therapy for HCC in the Indian context, acknowledging the recent shift in etiology from viral hepatitis to lifestyle-associated factors.</p><p>A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, including data from the Global Cancer Observatory and the Indian Council of Medical Research, along with a critical analysis of various clinical trials. The article investigates systemic therapies in-depth, discussing their mechanisms, efficacy, and adaptation to Indian healthcare framework.</p><p>Progression-free survival with a hazard ratio of ≤0.6 compared to sorafenib, overall survival of ∼16–19 months, and objective response rate of 20–30% are the defining thresholds for systemic therapy clinical trials. Systemic therapy for advanced HCC in India primarily involves the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib, with sorafenib being the most commonly used drug for a long time. Monoclonal antibodies such as ramucirumab and bevacizumab and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, are expanding treatment horizons. Lenvatinib has emerged as a cost-effective alternative, and the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Despite these advances, late-stage diagnosis and limited healthcare accessibility pose significant challenges, often relegating patients to palliative care.</p><p>Addressing HCC in India demands an integrative approach that not only encompasses advancements in systemic therapy but also targets early detection and comprehensive care models. Future strategies should focus on enhancing awareness, screening for high-risk populations, and overcoming infrastructural disparities. Ensuring the judicious use of systemic therapies within the constraints of the Indian healthcare economy is crucial. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of systemic therapeutic options and their optimal utilization will be pivotal in elevating the standard of HCC care in India.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝细胞癌(HCC)是印度癌症相关死亡的主要原因。这篇综述探讨了印度的流行病学趋势和 HCC 的系统治疗情况,同时承认最近病因从病毒性肝炎转向生活方式相关因素。文章对文献进行了全面综述,包括来自全球癌症观察站和印度医学研究理事会的数据,以及对各种临床试验的批判性分析。与索拉非尼相比,无进展生存期的危险比≤0.6,总生存期为16-19个月,客观反应率为20-30%,这些都是系统疗法临床试验的界定标准。在印度,晚期 HCC 的全身治疗主要包括使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,如索拉非尼、伦伐替尼、瑞戈非尼和卡博赞替尼,其中索拉非尼是长期以来最常用的药物。ramucirumab和贝伐珠单抗等单克隆抗体以及atezolizumab、nivolumab和pembrolizumab等免疫检查点抑制剂正在扩大治疗范围。伦伐替尼已成为一种具有成本效益的替代疗法,atezolizumab和贝伐珠单抗的联合用药在总生存期和无进展生存期方面都取得了卓越的疗效。尽管取得了这些进展,但晚期诊断和有限的医疗可及性带来了巨大挑战,往往使患者只能接受姑息治疗。在印度治疗 HCC 需要采取综合方法,不仅包括系统治疗方面的进展,还要针对早期检测和综合护理模式。未来的战略应侧重于提高认识、筛查高危人群以及克服基础设施方面的差距。确保在印度医疗经济的限制下合理使用系统疗法至关重要。最终,对全身治疗方案及其最佳利用的细致了解将对提高印度的 HCC 治疗水平起到关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in India. This review explores the epidemiological trends and the landscape of systemic therapy for HCC in the Indian context, acknowledging the recent shift in etiology from viral hepatitis to lifestyle-associated factors.

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, including data from the Global Cancer Observatory and the Indian Council of Medical Research, along with a critical analysis of various clinical trials. The article investigates systemic therapies in-depth, discussing their mechanisms, efficacy, and adaptation to Indian healthcare framework.

Progression-free survival with a hazard ratio of ≤0.6 compared to sorafenib, overall survival of ∼16–19 months, and objective response rate of 20–30% are the defining thresholds for systemic therapy clinical trials. Systemic therapy for advanced HCC in India primarily involves the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib, with sorafenib being the most commonly used drug for a long time. Monoclonal antibodies such as ramucirumab and bevacizumab and immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, are expanding treatment horizons. Lenvatinib has emerged as a cost-effective alternative, and the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Despite these advances, late-stage diagnosis and limited healthcare accessibility pose significant challenges, often relegating patients to palliative care.

Addressing HCC in India demands an integrative approach that not only encompasses advancements in systemic therapy but also targets early detection and comprehensive care models. Future strategies should focus on enhancing awareness, screening for high-risk populations, and overcoming infrastructural disparities. Ensuring the judicious use of systemic therapies within the constraints of the Indian healthcare economy is crucial. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of systemic therapeutic options and their optimal utilization will be pivotal in elevating the standard of HCC care in India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信