火灾中连续弹性侧向约束对钢木混合结构梁和梁-柱的影响

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Aatish Jeebodh , Buick Davison , Martyn S. McLaggan , Ian Burgess , Danny Hopkin , Shan-Shan Huang
{"title":"火灾中连续弹性侧向约束对钢木混合结构梁和梁-柱的影响","authors":"Aatish Jeebodh ,&nbsp;Buick Davison ,&nbsp;Martyn S. McLaggan ,&nbsp;Ian Burgess ,&nbsp;Danny Hopkin ,&nbsp;Shan-Shan Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the climate crisis and pursuit of efforts to reduce embodied carbon impacts in the built environment, steel-timber hybrid structures have emerged as a sustainable form of framed construction which offer numerous benefits over the widely used and well-established steel-concrete hybrid structures. However, there are major concerns about the structural fire performance of such systems among various stakeholders in the construction industry, particularly for the design implications in terms of the lateral-torsional buckling behaviour and the degree of lateral restraint mobilised in the steel-to-timber connections. The screws that connect cross-laminated timber slabs to steel beams may provide a certain degree of restraining action in fire. However, further investigations are required to quantify the slip characteristics of such connections. In this study, it was found from existing literature that at the fire limit state, the continuous elastic lateral stiffness available to restrain the beam varies between approximately 500 kN/m/m and 2000 kN/m/m. Relying entirely on the screws and using this practical range of stiffness, a parametric study using Eurocode 3 design buckling resistance equations on 9 m simply supported span steel beams and beam-columns with span-to-depth ratios of about 10, 15, 20 and 25 was performed. The results indicate that designing such members as fully restrained in fire conditions may lead to unrealistic assumptions and unsafe structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000857/pdfft?md5=2d0c2fe506d6f9cf48329634efd0e539&pid=1-s2.0-S0379711224000857-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of continuous elastic lateral restraints on beams and beam-columns of steel-timber hybrid structures in fire\",\"authors\":\"Aatish Jeebodh ,&nbsp;Buick Davison ,&nbsp;Martyn S. McLaggan ,&nbsp;Ian Burgess ,&nbsp;Danny Hopkin ,&nbsp;Shan-Shan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the climate crisis and pursuit of efforts to reduce embodied carbon impacts in the built environment, steel-timber hybrid structures have emerged as a sustainable form of framed construction which offer numerous benefits over the widely used and well-established steel-concrete hybrid structures. However, there are major concerns about the structural fire performance of such systems among various stakeholders in the construction industry, particularly for the design implications in terms of the lateral-torsional buckling behaviour and the degree of lateral restraint mobilised in the steel-to-timber connections. The screws that connect cross-laminated timber slabs to steel beams may provide a certain degree of restraining action in fire. However, further investigations are required to quantify the slip characteristics of such connections. In this study, it was found from existing literature that at the fire limit state, the continuous elastic lateral stiffness available to restrain the beam varies between approximately 500 kN/m/m and 2000 kN/m/m. Relying entirely on the screws and using this practical range of stiffness, a parametric study using Eurocode 3 design buckling resistance equations on 9 m simply supported span steel beams and beam-columns with span-to-depth ratios of about 10, 15, 20 and 25 was performed. The results indicate that designing such members as fully restrained in fire conditions may lead to unrealistic assumptions and unsafe structures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000857/pdfft?md5=2d0c2fe506d6f9cf48329634efd0e539&pid=1-s2.0-S0379711224000857-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着气候危机的到来以及人们对减少建筑环境中碳排放影响的努力,钢材-木材混合结构作为一种可持续的框架结构形式应运而生,与广泛使用且成熟的钢材-混凝土混合结构相比,它具有诸多优点。然而,建筑行业的各利益相关方对此类系统的结构防火性能,尤其是对钢材与木材连接处的横向扭转屈曲行为和横向约束程度的设计影响,存在很大的担忧。连接交叉层压木板和钢梁的螺钉可能会在火灾中提供一定程度的限制作用。不过,还需要进一步调查,以量化此类连接的滑移特性。本研究从现有文献中发现,在火灾极限状态下,可用于约束梁的连续弹性侧向刚度大约在 500 kN/m 至 2000 kN/m 之间。完全依靠螺钉并利用这一实际刚度范围,使用 Eurocode 3 设计抗屈曲方程对跨度与深度比约为 10、15、20 和 25 的 9 米简支撑跨度钢梁和梁柱进行了参数研究。结果表明,在火灾条件下将此类构件设计为完全受约束可能会导致不切实际的假设和不安全的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of continuous elastic lateral restraints on beams and beam-columns of steel-timber hybrid structures in fire

With the climate crisis and pursuit of efforts to reduce embodied carbon impacts in the built environment, steel-timber hybrid structures have emerged as a sustainable form of framed construction which offer numerous benefits over the widely used and well-established steel-concrete hybrid structures. However, there are major concerns about the structural fire performance of such systems among various stakeholders in the construction industry, particularly for the design implications in terms of the lateral-torsional buckling behaviour and the degree of lateral restraint mobilised in the steel-to-timber connections. The screws that connect cross-laminated timber slabs to steel beams may provide a certain degree of restraining action in fire. However, further investigations are required to quantify the slip characteristics of such connections. In this study, it was found from existing literature that at the fire limit state, the continuous elastic lateral stiffness available to restrain the beam varies between approximately 500 kN/m/m and 2000 kN/m/m. Relying entirely on the screws and using this practical range of stiffness, a parametric study using Eurocode 3 design buckling resistance equations on 9 m simply supported span steel beams and beam-columns with span-to-depth ratios of about 10, 15, 20 and 25 was performed. The results indicate that designing such members as fully restrained in fire conditions may lead to unrealistic assumptions and unsafe structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信