根据斯大林格勒第一部分的文件对布尔什维克领导人、十月事件和察里津保卫战组织者的嘉奖

I. Tyumentsev
{"title":"根据斯大林格勒第一部分的文件对布尔什维克领导人、十月事件和察里津保卫战组织者的嘉奖","authors":"I. Tyumentsev","doi":"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article is a direct continuation of the article published in Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations (2022) devoted to the preparation of the collective portfolio (“vignettes”) of the heroes of the Revolution of 1917 and the Defense of Tsaritsyn in 1918– 1920. The subject of the article is an analysis of the preparation of awards for veterans in connection with the 15th anniversary of the Red Army with the aim of establishing the real asset of the Bolsheviks. Methods and materials. The award-winning materials of the Stalingrad Istpart are critically analyzed using the methods of textual analysis and prosopography. Observations and conclusions. In May 1932, the secretary of the Stalingrad “five” of the Lower Volga Regional Department, T.M. Seregin, prepared a list of 100 Bolshevik veterans for the award commission of the Stalingrad City Council. Stalingrad veterans, in turn, submitted a list of 34 people to the commission. The draft documents provoked sharp criticism of the Moscow Circle of veterans of the Revolution and Defense of Tsaritsyn formed by that time at the “All-Union Society of Old Bolsheviks.” The Moscow circle made a proposal to allocate a “narrow asset” (managers) to be awarded with orders and a “broad asset” (middle managers) – only to “encourage.” The proposal was rejected by the Stalingrad City Council. On the basis of both lists, a portfolio of 31 people and an award list of 34 Bolshevik senior managers were created. The proposals of Muscovites provoked a negative reaction from the Stalingrad circle of “Red Partisans” formed by that time. As a result of heated disputes, it was decided to ask the country’s leadership to award the Orders of the Red Banner to 24 people, Lenin to 6 people, regional awards to 40, and city awards to 9 veterans. A new project portfolio (“vignettes”) was compiled, on which 129 people were already placed. Thanks to these disputes, it was possible to identify the real, and not the mythical, circle of Bolshevik leaders of the October events and the Defense of Tsaritsyn and assess their contribution to the victory over the counter-revolution.","PeriodicalId":515910,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","volume":"28 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awards of the Leaders of the Bolsheviks, the Organizers of the October Events and the Defense of Tsaritsyn According to the Documents of the Stalingrad Istpart\",\"authors\":\"I. Tyumentsev\",\"doi\":\"10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The article is a direct continuation of the article published in Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations (2022) devoted to the preparation of the collective portfolio (“vignettes”) of the heroes of the Revolution of 1917 and the Defense of Tsaritsyn in 1918– 1920. The subject of the article is an analysis of the preparation of awards for veterans in connection with the 15th anniversary of the Red Army with the aim of establishing the real asset of the Bolsheviks. Methods and materials. The award-winning materials of the Stalingrad Istpart are critically analyzed using the methods of textual analysis and prosopography. Observations and conclusions. In May 1932, the secretary of the Stalingrad “five” of the Lower Volga Regional Department, T.M. Seregin, prepared a list of 100 Bolshevik veterans for the award commission of the Stalingrad City Council. Stalingrad veterans, in turn, submitted a list of 34 people to the commission. The draft documents provoked sharp criticism of the Moscow Circle of veterans of the Revolution and Defense of Tsaritsyn formed by that time at the “All-Union Society of Old Bolsheviks.” The Moscow circle made a proposal to allocate a “narrow asset” (managers) to be awarded with orders and a “broad asset” (middle managers) – only to “encourage.” The proposal was rejected by the Stalingrad City Council. On the basis of both lists, a portfolio of 31 people and an award list of 34 Bolshevik senior managers were created. The proposals of Muscovites provoked a negative reaction from the Stalingrad circle of “Red Partisans” formed by that time. As a result of heated disputes, it was decided to ask the country’s leadership to award the Orders of the Red Banner to 24 people, Lenin to 6 people, regional awards to 40, and city awards to 9 veterans. A new project portfolio (“vignettes”) was compiled, on which 129 people were already placed. Thanks to these disputes, it was possible to identify the real, and not the mythical, circle of Bolshevik leaders of the October events and the Defense of Tsaritsyn and assess their contribution to the victory over the counter-revolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 4. Istorija. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。本文是发表在《伏尔加格勒国立大学科学杂志》上的文章的直接延续。历史。地区研究。国际关系》(2022 年)上发表的关于 1917 年革命英雄和 1918-1920 年察里津保卫战英雄的集体作品集("小故事")准备工作的文章。文章的主题是分析为纪念红军 15 周年而准备老兵奖的情况,目的是确定布尔什维克的真实资产。方法和材料。使用文本分析和拟物学方法对斯大林格勒第一部分的获奖材料进行了批判性分析。观察和结论。1932 年 5 月,下伏尔加河地区行署斯大林格勒 "五部 "秘书 T.M. 谢列金准备了一份 100 名布尔什维克老兵的名单,提交给斯大林格勒市议会奖励委员会。斯大林格勒老兵则向委员会提交了一份 34 人的名单。文件草案引起了当时在 "全联盟老布尔什维克协会 "中成立的莫斯科革命和保卫察里津老战士小组的尖锐批评。莫斯科圈子提出了一项建议,即分配 "狭义资产"(管理人员)以获得订单,而 "广义资产"(中层管理人员)--只用于 "鼓励"。斯大林格勒市议会拒绝了这一建议。在这两份名单的基础上,制定了一份由 31 人组成的组合名单和一份由 34 名布尔什维克高级管理人员组成的奖励名单。莫斯科人的提议引起了斯大林格勒当时形成的 "红色游击队 "圈子的负面反应。激烈争论的结果是,决定请国家领导人授予 24 人红旗勋章,6 人列宁勋章,40 人地区勋章,9 人城市勋章。编制了一个新的项目组合("小故事"),已有 129 人被列入其中。有了这些争议,才有可能确定十月事件和察里津保卫战中布尔什维克领导人的真实而非神话般的圈子,并评估他们对战胜反革命的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awards of the Leaders of the Bolsheviks, the Organizers of the October Events and the Defense of Tsaritsyn According to the Documents of the Stalingrad Istpart
Introduction. The article is a direct continuation of the article published in Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations (2022) devoted to the preparation of the collective portfolio (“vignettes”) of the heroes of the Revolution of 1917 and the Defense of Tsaritsyn in 1918– 1920. The subject of the article is an analysis of the preparation of awards for veterans in connection with the 15th anniversary of the Red Army with the aim of establishing the real asset of the Bolsheviks. Methods and materials. The award-winning materials of the Stalingrad Istpart are critically analyzed using the methods of textual analysis and prosopography. Observations and conclusions. In May 1932, the secretary of the Stalingrad “five” of the Lower Volga Regional Department, T.M. Seregin, prepared a list of 100 Bolshevik veterans for the award commission of the Stalingrad City Council. Stalingrad veterans, in turn, submitted a list of 34 people to the commission. The draft documents provoked sharp criticism of the Moscow Circle of veterans of the Revolution and Defense of Tsaritsyn formed by that time at the “All-Union Society of Old Bolsheviks.” The Moscow circle made a proposal to allocate a “narrow asset” (managers) to be awarded with orders and a “broad asset” (middle managers) – only to “encourage.” The proposal was rejected by the Stalingrad City Council. On the basis of both lists, a portfolio of 31 people and an award list of 34 Bolshevik senior managers were created. The proposals of Muscovites provoked a negative reaction from the Stalingrad circle of “Red Partisans” formed by that time. As a result of heated disputes, it was decided to ask the country’s leadership to award the Orders of the Red Banner to 24 people, Lenin to 6 people, regional awards to 40, and city awards to 9 veterans. A new project portfolio (“vignettes”) was compiled, on which 129 people were already placed. Thanks to these disputes, it was possible to identify the real, and not the mythical, circle of Bolshevik leaders of the October events and the Defense of Tsaritsyn and assess their contribution to the victory over the counter-revolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信