Jairo Cajamarca-Barón , Diana Guavita-Navarro , Ana María Gutiérrez Cura , Paula Cristina Castro Quiroga , Héctor Cubides , Ana María Arredondo , Alejandro Escobar , José Fernando Polo Nieto , Claudia Ibáñez , Adriana Rojas-Villarraga
{"title":"使用两种组织病理学方法分析干燥症状患者的斯约格伦综合征发病率","authors":"Jairo Cajamarca-Barón , Diana Guavita-Navarro , Ana María Gutiérrez Cura , Paula Cristina Castro Quiroga , Héctor Cubides , Ana María Arredondo , Alejandro Escobar , José Fernando Polo Nieto , Claudia Ibáñez , Adriana Rojas-Villarraga","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreue.2022.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><p>The criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) classification (ACR/EULAR 2016), include labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy using the focus score (FS). But, in some cases it continues to be based on Chisholm and Mason (CM). Our objective was to evaluate the frequency of SS in patients with dry symptoms using FS and CM and to evaluate the degree of inter and intra-observer concordance of the histopathological reading by both methods.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study design. All patients with dry symptoms and studies to perform the SS classification criteria (2016) were included. The samples were independently evaluated by two readers. Descriptive statistics was used for the calculation of SS frequency. Agreement (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient) was analysed (STATA) for each test (CM and FS). Ethics approval was obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>92 patients were included. According to the 2016 criteria, SS was reported in 26.1% patients in whom FS was used and in 34.8% patients in whom CM was used. The degree of intra-observer concordance for the diagnosis of FLS was perfect and moderate-high for observers. Inter-observer agreement was substantial, with kappa values of .77 FS and .75 CM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FS method is a more detailed and specific score that facilitates correct classification. The use of CM as a histopathological classificatory method for SS includes more patients when compared with FS. These results are of relevance to standardise the reading of LSG biopsy in specialized services attending SS patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101099,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of Sjögren’s syndrome in patients with dry symptoms using two histopathological methods\",\"authors\":\"Jairo Cajamarca-Barón , Diana Guavita-Navarro , Ana María Gutiérrez Cura , Paula Cristina Castro Quiroga , Héctor Cubides , Ana María Arredondo , Alejandro Escobar , José Fernando Polo Nieto , Claudia Ibáñez , Adriana Rojas-Villarraga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcreue.2022.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><p>The criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) classification (ACR/EULAR 2016), include labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy using the focus score (FS). But, in some cases it continues to be based on Chisholm and Mason (CM). Our objective was to evaluate the frequency of SS in patients with dry symptoms using FS and CM and to evaluate the degree of inter and intra-observer concordance of the histopathological reading by both methods.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study design. All patients with dry symptoms and studies to perform the SS classification criteria (2016) were included. The samples were independently evaluated by two readers. Descriptive statistics was used for the calculation of SS frequency. Agreement (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient) was analysed (STATA) for each test (CM and FS). Ethics approval was obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>92 patients were included. According to the 2016 criteria, SS was reported in 26.1% patients in whom FS was used and in 34.8% patients in whom CM was used. The degree of intra-observer concordance for the diagnosis of FLS was perfect and moderate-high for observers. Inter-observer agreement was substantial, with kappa values of .77 FS and .75 CM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>FS method is a more detailed and specific score that facilitates correct classification. The use of CM as a histopathological classificatory method for SS includes more patients when compared with FS. These results are of relevance to standardise the reading of LSG biopsy in specialized services attending SS patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440524000293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440524000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言和目标斯约格伦综合征(SS)的分类标准(ACR/EULAR,2016 年)包括使用病灶评分(FS)进行唇唾液腺(LSG)活检。但在某些情况下,仍以 Chisholm 和 Mason(CM)为基础。我们的目的是使用 FS 和 CM 评估干燥症状患者出现 SS 的频率,并评估这两种方法的组织病理学读数在观察者之间和观察者内部的一致程度。纳入所有有干燥症状的患者和执行 SS 分类标准(2016 年)的研究。样本由两名阅读者独立评估。描述性统计用于计算SS频率。对每次测试(CM 和 FS)的一致性(Cohen's Kappa coefficient)进行了分析(STATA)。结果92名患者被纳入研究。根据2016年的标准,使用FS的患者中有26.1%报告了SS,使用CM的患者中有34.8%报告了SS。观察者内部对FLS诊断的一致性程度为完全一致,观察者的一致性程度为中等偏上。观察者之间的一致性很高,卡帕值分别为 0.77 FS 和 0.75 CM。与 FS 相比,使用 CM 作为 SS 的组织病理学分类方法可纳入更多患者。这些结果对于规范SS患者专科医院的LSG活检阅读具有重要意义。
Frequency of Sjögren’s syndrome in patients with dry symptoms using two histopathological methods
Introduction and objective
The criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) classification (ACR/EULAR 2016), include labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy using the focus score (FS). But, in some cases it continues to be based on Chisholm and Mason (CM). Our objective was to evaluate the frequency of SS in patients with dry symptoms using FS and CM and to evaluate the degree of inter and intra-observer concordance of the histopathological reading by both methods.
Materials and methods
Cross-sectional study design. All patients with dry symptoms and studies to perform the SS classification criteria (2016) were included. The samples were independently evaluated by two readers. Descriptive statistics was used for the calculation of SS frequency. Agreement (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient) was analysed (STATA) for each test (CM and FS). Ethics approval was obtained.
Results
92 patients were included. According to the 2016 criteria, SS was reported in 26.1% patients in whom FS was used and in 34.8% patients in whom CM was used. The degree of intra-observer concordance for the diagnosis of FLS was perfect and moderate-high for observers. Inter-observer agreement was substantial, with kappa values of .77 FS and .75 CM.
Conclusions
FS method is a more detailed and specific score that facilitates correct classification. The use of CM as a histopathological classificatory method for SS includes more patients when compared with FS. These results are of relevance to standardise the reading of LSG biopsy in specialized services attending SS patients.