在两次布鲁氏菌实验室暴露后实施生物安全软件弹出式操作

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Broertjes , E.C. van Overbeek , T. Ten Doesschate , K. Slieker , E. Hazenberg , S.P.M. Lutgens , E. Kolwijck , A.C.A.P. Leenders , P.C. Wever
{"title":"在两次布鲁氏菌实验室暴露后实施生物安全软件弹出式操作","authors":"J. Broertjes ,&nbsp;E.C. van Overbeek ,&nbsp;T. Ten Doesschate ,&nbsp;K. Slieker ,&nbsp;E. Hazenberg ,&nbsp;S.P.M. Lutgens ,&nbsp;E. Kolwijck ,&nbsp;A.C.A.P. Leenders ,&nbsp;P.C. Wever","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2024.100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Brucellosis is rare in non-endemic countries where it mainly occurs as an imported or travel-related disease. In rare cases, <em>Brucella</em> species (spp.) are present in clinical specimens processed by clinical microbiology laboratories. These pathogens pose a risk to laboratory technicians, due to the high virulence, a low-infectious dose and ease of aerosol formation. Due to the low incidence in non-endemic countries, clinical samples are routinely processed on laboratory benches outside laminar flow cabinets. Recently, we have had three unexpected cases in which <em>Brucella</em> spp. were cultured at our clinical microbiology laboratory: one <em>Brucella canis</em> case and two <em>Brucella melitenis</em> cases. The <em>B. canis</em> and the first <em>B. melitenis</em> cases prompted the introduction of a biosafety software pop-up, which is presented in this paper.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, we describe the two <em>B. melitensis</em> cases and the introduction of a biosafety pop-up. The software pop-up parameters are a time-to-positivity (TTP) of more than 48 h, in an aerobic blood culture bottle, and a Gram stain appearance as Gram-negative bacteria. The software pop-up warns the technician through the laboratory information system (LIS) to further process the specimen in the Class 2 biological safety cabinet. To assess the number of false-positive pop-ups we can expect and resulting additional workload, we retrospectively analyzed laboratory data from the last seven years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The biosafety pop-up prevented laboratory exposure in the second <em>B. melitensis</em> case. Based on the retrospective analysis of laboratory data, we estimated the resulting additional workload of implementation of the biosafety pop-up to be less than one blood culture bottle per week on average to be processed in a Class 2 biological safety cabinet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our experience demonstrates that implementation of the biosafety software pop-up can reduce the risk of laboratory exposure to <em>Brucella</em> spp. This intervention provides a feasible approach even in a setting where <em>Brucella</em> spp. are normally only encountered every few years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000185/pdfft?md5=74593f8378bd026a2ca07c1f5a2680aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2352352224000185-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a biosafety software pop-up after two Brucella laboratory exposures\",\"authors\":\"J. Broertjes ,&nbsp;E.C. van Overbeek ,&nbsp;T. Ten Doesschate ,&nbsp;K. Slieker ,&nbsp;E. Hazenberg ,&nbsp;S.P.M. Lutgens ,&nbsp;E. Kolwijck ,&nbsp;A.C.A.P. Leenders ,&nbsp;P.C. Wever\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mran.2024.100307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Brucellosis is rare in non-endemic countries where it mainly occurs as an imported or travel-related disease. In rare cases, <em>Brucella</em> species (spp.) are present in clinical specimens processed by clinical microbiology laboratories. These pathogens pose a risk to laboratory technicians, due to the high virulence, a low-infectious dose and ease of aerosol formation. Due to the low incidence in non-endemic countries, clinical samples are routinely processed on laboratory benches outside laminar flow cabinets. Recently, we have had three unexpected cases in which <em>Brucella</em> spp. were cultured at our clinical microbiology laboratory: one <em>Brucella canis</em> case and two <em>Brucella melitenis</em> cases. The <em>B. canis</em> and the first <em>B. melitenis</em> cases prompted the introduction of a biosafety software pop-up, which is presented in this paper.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Here, we describe the two <em>B. melitensis</em> cases and the introduction of a biosafety pop-up. The software pop-up parameters are a time-to-positivity (TTP) of more than 48 h, in an aerobic blood culture bottle, and a Gram stain appearance as Gram-negative bacteria. The software pop-up warns the technician through the laboratory information system (LIS) to further process the specimen in the Class 2 biological safety cabinet. To assess the number of false-positive pop-ups we can expect and resulting additional workload, we retrospectively analyzed laboratory data from the last seven years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The biosafety pop-up prevented laboratory exposure in the second <em>B. melitensis</em> case. Based on the retrospective analysis of laboratory data, we estimated the resulting additional workload of implementation of the biosafety pop-up to be less than one blood culture bottle per week on average to be processed in a Class 2 biological safety cabinet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our experience demonstrates that implementation of the biosafety software pop-up can reduce the risk of laboratory exposure to <em>Brucella</em> spp. This intervention provides a feasible approach even in a setting where <em>Brucella</em> spp. are normally only encountered every few years.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000185/pdfft?md5=74593f8378bd026a2ca07c1f5a2680aa&pid=1-s2.0-S2352352224000185-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352352224000185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言布鲁氏菌病在非流行国家很少见,在这些国家,布鲁氏菌病主要是一种输入性疾病或与旅行有关的疾病。在极少数情况下,布鲁氏菌会出现在临床微生物实验室处理的临床标本中。由于这些病原体毒力强、感染剂量低且容易形成气溶胶,因此会给实验室技术人员带来风险。由于非流行国家的发病率较低,临床样本通常都是在层流柜外的实验室工作台上进行处理。最近,我们的临床微生物实验室意外培养出了三例布鲁氏菌属病例:一例犬科布鲁氏菌病例和两例梅毒布鲁氏菌病例。犬布鲁氏菌病例和第一例梅里泰尼布鲁氏菌病例促使我们引入了生物安全软件弹出式窗口,本文将对此进行介绍。方法在此,我们介绍了两例梅里泰尼布鲁氏菌病例和引入生物安全弹出式窗口的情况。软件弹出参数为:在需氧血培养瓶中,阳性时间(TTP)超过 48 小时,且革兰氏染色显示为革兰氏阴性菌。软件弹出窗口会通过实验室信息系统(LIS)警告技术人员在 2 级生物安全柜中进一步处理标本。为了评估假阳性弹出窗口的数量以及由此造成的额外工作量,我们对过去七年的实验室数据进行了回顾性分析。根据对实验室数据的回顾性分析,我们估计实施生物安全弹出式窗口所产生的额外工作量平均少于每周在 2 级生物安全柜中处理一个血液培养瓶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a biosafety software pop-up after two Brucella laboratory exposures

Introduction

Brucellosis is rare in non-endemic countries where it mainly occurs as an imported or travel-related disease. In rare cases, Brucella species (spp.) are present in clinical specimens processed by clinical microbiology laboratories. These pathogens pose a risk to laboratory technicians, due to the high virulence, a low-infectious dose and ease of aerosol formation. Due to the low incidence in non-endemic countries, clinical samples are routinely processed on laboratory benches outside laminar flow cabinets. Recently, we have had three unexpected cases in which Brucella spp. were cultured at our clinical microbiology laboratory: one Brucella canis case and two Brucella melitenis cases. The B. canis and the first B. melitenis cases prompted the introduction of a biosafety software pop-up, which is presented in this paper.

Methods

Here, we describe the two B. melitensis cases and the introduction of a biosafety pop-up. The software pop-up parameters are a time-to-positivity (TTP) of more than 48 h, in an aerobic blood culture bottle, and a Gram stain appearance as Gram-negative bacteria. The software pop-up warns the technician through the laboratory information system (LIS) to further process the specimen in the Class 2 biological safety cabinet. To assess the number of false-positive pop-ups we can expect and resulting additional workload, we retrospectively analyzed laboratory data from the last seven years.

Results

The biosafety pop-up prevented laboratory exposure in the second B. melitensis case. Based on the retrospective analysis of laboratory data, we estimated the resulting additional workload of implementation of the biosafety pop-up to be less than one blood culture bottle per week on average to be processed in a Class 2 biological safety cabinet.

Conclusion

Our experience demonstrates that implementation of the biosafety software pop-up can reduce the risk of laboratory exposure to Brucella spp. This intervention provides a feasible approach even in a setting where Brucella spp. are normally only encountered every few years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信