巴西生产的海洋生物燃料的技术经济和环境评估

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Lucas Cesilla de Souza, Joaquim Eugênio Abel Seabra
{"title":"巴西生产的海洋生物燃料的技术经济和环境评估","authors":"Lucas Cesilla de Souza,&nbsp;Joaquim Eugênio Abel Seabra","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study compared the technical-economic and life cycle environmental (LCA) performance of a bulk carrier, powered by different biofuels that could potentially be produced in Brazil, with a ship powered by low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO). Six biofuel pathways and two power systems (two-stroke diesel engine and solid oxide fuel cell) were evaluated. The technical-economic assessment estimated the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP), and the impacts on the levelized cost of shipping (LCOS). All biofuels showed reductions ranging from 63.12% to 89.98% in GHG emissions per t.km compared to LSFO. Biofuels also performed better in terms of fine particulate matter formation and fossil resource scarcity, while results for the other environmental categories varied according to the production pathway. From an economic perspective, all biofuels showed higher MFSP (2.46–3.75 times) and LCOS (1.58–3.08 times) compared to LSFO. The results showed the potential of biofuels to reduce the carbon footprint and the economic challenges to overcome. In this sense, governmental programs and incentives can allow marine biofuels bridge the competitivity gap with fossil fuels. In the short-term, the adoption of different strategies, such as offsetting schemes, may be necessary for the international shipping decarbonization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000333/pdfft?md5=e58f193bfafd1e8e8a2834e4e123e640&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical-economic and environmental assessment of marine biofuels produced in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Cesilla de Souza,&nbsp;Joaquim Eugênio Abel Seabra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study compared the technical-economic and life cycle environmental (LCA) performance of a bulk carrier, powered by different biofuels that could potentially be produced in Brazil, with a ship powered by low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO). Six biofuel pathways and two power systems (two-stroke diesel engine and solid oxide fuel cell) were evaluated. The technical-economic assessment estimated the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP), and the impacts on the levelized cost of shipping (LCOS). All biofuels showed reductions ranging from 63.12% to 89.98% in GHG emissions per t.km compared to LSFO. Biofuels also performed better in terms of fine particulate matter formation and fossil resource scarcity, while results for the other environmental categories varied according to the production pathway. From an economic perspective, all biofuels showed higher MFSP (2.46–3.75 times) and LCOS (1.58–3.08 times) compared to LSFO. The results showed the potential of biofuels to reduce the carbon footprint and the economic challenges to overcome. In this sense, governmental programs and incentives can allow marine biofuels bridge the competitivity gap with fossil fuels. In the short-term, the adoption of different strategies, such as offsetting schemes, may be necessary for the international shipping decarbonization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000333/pdfft?md5=e58f193bfafd1e8e8a2834e4e123e640&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000333-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了以巴西可能生产的不同生物燃料为动力的散货船与以低硫燃油(LSFO)为动力的船舶的技术经济和生命周期环境(LCA)性能。对六种生物燃料途径和两种动力系统(二冲程柴油发动机和固体氧化物燃料电池)进行了评估。技术经济评估估算了最低燃料销售价格(MFSP)以及对运输平准化成本(LCOS)的影响。与直燃燃料相比,所有生物燃料每吨公里的温室气体排放量减少了 63.12% 至 89.98%。生物燃料在细颗粒物形成和化石资源稀缺方面的表现也更好,而其他环境类别的结果则因生产途径而异。从经济角度来看,所有生物燃料的 MFSP(2.46-3.75 倍)和 LCOS(1.58-3.08 倍)均高于 LSFO。研究结果表明了生物燃料在减少碳足迹方面的潜力以及需要克服的经济挑战。从这个意义上讲,政府计划和激励措施可以使海洋生物燃料缩小与化石燃料的竞争力差距。在短期内,采用不同的战略,如抵消计划,可能是国际航运去碳化所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Technical-economic and environmental assessment of marine biofuels produced in Brazil

Technical-economic and environmental assessment of marine biofuels produced in Brazil

This study compared the technical-economic and life cycle environmental (LCA) performance of a bulk carrier, powered by different biofuels that could potentially be produced in Brazil, with a ship powered by low-sulfur fuel oil (LSFO). Six biofuel pathways and two power systems (two-stroke diesel engine and solid oxide fuel cell) were evaluated. The technical-economic assessment estimated the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP), and the impacts on the levelized cost of shipping (LCOS). All biofuels showed reductions ranging from 63.12% to 89.98% in GHG emissions per t.km compared to LSFO. Biofuels also performed better in terms of fine particulate matter formation and fossil resource scarcity, while results for the other environmental categories varied according to the production pathway. From an economic perspective, all biofuels showed higher MFSP (2.46–3.75 times) and LCOS (1.58–3.08 times) compared to LSFO. The results showed the potential of biofuels to reduce the carbon footprint and the economic challenges to overcome. In this sense, governmental programs and incentives can allow marine biofuels bridge the competitivity gap with fossil fuels. In the short-term, the adoption of different strategies, such as offsetting schemes, may be necessary for the international shipping decarbonization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信