通过跨党派宣传追求道路正义

Tom Cohen
{"title":"通过跨党派宣传追求道路正义","authors":"Tom Cohen","doi":"10.48295/et.2024.97.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of attempting to influence policy is explored through the example of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling and Walking’s (APPGCW’s) inquiry on road justice, carried out in 2023. First the APPGCW is introduced, then the process of the inquiry briefly explained. To illustrate the practical business of developing recommendations as part of an inquiry, one potential recommendation is discussed in detail – the idea of basing penalties for traffic offences partly on the momentum of the vehicles involved. The rationale for such a policy is explained, then the practicalities and possible shortcomings examined. This discussion concludes with the reasoning behind opting not to make a recommendation along these lines. The paper then describes the inquiry report’s content and reception, and concludes with reflections on how reports of this kind are developed and whether they achieve their ends.","PeriodicalId":507704,"journal":{"name":"European Transport/Trasporti Europei","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pursuing road justice through cross-party advocacy\",\"authors\":\"Tom Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.48295/et.2024.97.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of attempting to influence policy is explored through the example of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling and Walking’s (APPGCW’s) inquiry on road justice, carried out in 2023. First the APPGCW is introduced, then the process of the inquiry briefly explained. To illustrate the practical business of developing recommendations as part of an inquiry, one potential recommendation is discussed in detail – the idea of basing penalties for traffic offences partly on the momentum of the vehicles involved. The rationale for such a policy is explained, then the practicalities and possible shortcomings examined. This discussion concludes with the reasoning behind opting not to make a recommendation along these lines. The paper then describes the inquiry report’s content and reception, and concludes with reflections on how reports of this kind are developed and whether they achieve their ends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Transport/Trasporti Europei\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Transport/Trasporti Europei\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport/Trasporti Europei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2024.97.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以英国自行车与步行跨党派议会小组(APPGCW)于 2023 年开展的道路公正调查为例,探讨了试图影响政策的过程。首先介绍 APPGCW,然后简要说明调查过程。为了说明作为调查的一部分制定建议的实际业务,详细讨论了一个潜在的建议--对交通违法行为的处罚部分基于所涉车辆的动力的想法。首先解释了这一政策的基本原理,然后探讨了其实用性和可能存在的缺陷。讨论的最后,说明了选择不按此思路提出建议的理由。然后,本文介绍了调查报告的内容和接受情况,最后对此类报告的编写方式和是否达到目的进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pursuing road justice through cross-party advocacy
The process of attempting to influence policy is explored through the example of the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling and Walking’s (APPGCW’s) inquiry on road justice, carried out in 2023. First the APPGCW is introduced, then the process of the inquiry briefly explained. To illustrate the practical business of developing recommendations as part of an inquiry, one potential recommendation is discussed in detail – the idea of basing penalties for traffic offences partly on the momentum of the vehicles involved. The rationale for such a policy is explained, then the practicalities and possible shortcomings examined. This discussion concludes with the reasoning behind opting not to make a recommendation along these lines. The paper then describes the inquiry report’s content and reception, and concludes with reflections on how reports of this kind are developed and whether they achieve their ends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信