视网膜神经纤维层 OCT 的生物学和方法学变异:弗雷明汉心脏研究

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"视网膜神经纤维层 OCT 的生物学和方法学变异:弗雷明汉心脏研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore participant-level biological attributes and scan-level methodological attributes associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness variability in a population-based sample of elderly United States adults.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional analysis using data from the Framingham Heart Study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>One thousand three hundred forty-seven eyes from 825 participants with ≥1 OCT scan and axial length data were included.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three or more successive RNFL scans of each eye of each participant were obtained in a single session. Multivariable linear mixed models were employed to explore the associations between average RNFL thickness with participant-level biological attributes (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and axial length) and scan-level attributes (signal strength [SS]) as independent variables in the whole population as well as a subsample of adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma. Similar analyses were designed to assess methodological variability with average within-eye standard deviation (SD) for repeated scans as the dependent variable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcomes Measures</h3><p>(1) Biological variability: average RNFL thickness, and (2) methodological variability: average within-participant SD across repeated scans.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Age (β = <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.19 microns/year, [95% confidence interval {CI}: <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.29, <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.09]), female gender (β = +1.48 microns vs. male, [95% CI: 0.09, 2.86]), axial length (β = <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>1.24 microns/mm of greater length, [95% CI: <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>1.80, <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.67]), and SS (β = +1.62 microns/1 unit greater SS, [95% CI: 1.16, 2.09]) were significantly associated with RNFL thickness, while race and ethnicity were not (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). In analyses designed to assess methodological variability, higher RNFL thickness (β = +0.02 per micron increase, [95% CI: 0.01, 0.03]), and lower SS (β = +0.19 per 1 unit lower SS, [95% CI: 0.10, 0.27]) were significantly associated with greater RNFL variability. In adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma (n of eyes = 1165, n of participants = 712), female gender was not associated with RNFL, while African American race was associated with thicker RNFL (β = +4.65 microns vs. Whites, [95% CI: 1.28, 8.03]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is lower with older age, male gender, greater axial length, lower SS, and Whites (as compared with African Americans) without self-reported glaucoma. Measurement variability (SD) is higher with greater RNFL thickness and lower SS. Understanding these biological and methodological variations is important to aid in OCT interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400085X/pdfft?md5=cc59963c5ad70558c0a6d8a005f0137d&pid=1-s2.0-S266691452400085X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological and Methodological Variability in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer OCT: The Framingham Heart Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore participant-level biological attributes and scan-level methodological attributes associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness variability in a population-based sample of elderly United States adults.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional analysis using data from the Framingham Heart Study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>One thousand three hundred forty-seven eyes from 825 participants with ≥1 OCT scan and axial length data were included.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three or more successive RNFL scans of each eye of each participant were obtained in a single session. Multivariable linear mixed models were employed to explore the associations between average RNFL thickness with participant-level biological attributes (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and axial length) and scan-level attributes (signal strength [SS]) as independent variables in the whole population as well as a subsample of adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma. Similar analyses were designed to assess methodological variability with average within-eye standard deviation (SD) for repeated scans as the dependent variable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcomes Measures</h3><p>(1) Biological variability: average RNFL thickness, and (2) methodological variability: average within-participant SD across repeated scans.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Age (β = <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.19 microns/year, [95% confidence interval {CI}: <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.29, <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.09]), female gender (β = +1.48 microns vs. male, [95% CI: 0.09, 2.86]), axial length (β = <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>1.24 microns/mm of greater length, [95% CI: <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>1.80, <span><math><mrow><mo>−</mo></mrow></math></span>0.67]), and SS (β = +1.62 microns/1 unit greater SS, [95% CI: 1.16, 2.09]) were significantly associated with RNFL thickness, while race and ethnicity were not (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). In analyses designed to assess methodological variability, higher RNFL thickness (β = +0.02 per micron increase, [95% CI: 0.01, 0.03]), and lower SS (β = +0.19 per 1 unit lower SS, [95% CI: 0.10, 0.27]) were significantly associated with greater RNFL variability. In adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma (n of eyes = 1165, n of participants = 712), female gender was not associated with RNFL, while African American race was associated with thicker RNFL (β = +4.65 microns vs. Whites, [95% CI: 1.28, 8.03]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is lower with older age, male gender, greater axial length, lower SS, and Whites (as compared with African Americans) without self-reported glaucoma. Measurement variability (SD) is higher with greater RNFL thickness and lower SS. Understanding these biological and methodological variations is important to aid in OCT interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400085X/pdfft?md5=cc59963c5ad70558c0a6d8a005f0137d&pid=1-s2.0-S266691452400085X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400085X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266691452400085X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在以人口为基础的美国老年人样本中,探索与视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度变异相关的参与者水平生物属性和扫描水平方法属性。方法在单次扫描中对每位参与者的每只眼睛进行三次或三次以上的连续 RNFL 扫描。采用多变量线性混合模型来探讨平均 RNFL 厚度与作为自变量的整个人群和无青光眼自述病史的成人子样本的参与者水平生物属性(年龄、性别、种族、民族和轴长)和扫描水平属性(信号强度 [SS])之间的关系。主要结果测量(1)生物变异性:平均 RNFL 厚度;(2)方法变异性:重复扫描时参与者内部平均 SD。19 微米/年,[95% 置信区间 {CI}:-0.29,-0.09])、女性性别(β = +1.48 微米 vs. 男性,[95% CI:0.09,2.86])、轴向长度(β = -1.24 微米/毫米,[95% CI:-1.80,-0.67])和 SS(β = +1.62 微米/1 单位更大的 SS,[95% CI:1.16,2.09])与 RNFL 厚度显著相关,而种族和民族则不相关(P >;0.05)。在旨在评估方法变异性的分析中,较高的 RNFL 厚度(β = 每增加一微米 +0.02,[95% CI:0.01,0.03])和较低的 SS(β = 每降低一个单位 SS +0.19,[95% CI:0.10,0.27])与较大的 RNFL 变异性显著相关。结论视网膜神经纤维层厚度较低与年龄、性别、轴向长度、SS值较低以及白人(与非裔美国人相比)无青光眼自我报告有关。RNFL厚度越大、SS越低,测量变异性(SD)越高。了解这些生物学和方法学上的变异对帮助解释 OCT 非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological and Methodological Variability in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer OCT: The Framingham Heart Study

Objective

To explore participant-level biological attributes and scan-level methodological attributes associated with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness variability in a population-based sample of elderly United States adults.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis using data from the Framingham Heart Study.

Participants

One thousand three hundred forty-seven eyes from 825 participants with ≥1 OCT scan and axial length data were included.

Methods

Three or more successive RNFL scans of each eye of each participant were obtained in a single session. Multivariable linear mixed models were employed to explore the associations between average RNFL thickness with participant-level biological attributes (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and axial length) and scan-level attributes (signal strength [SS]) as independent variables in the whole population as well as a subsample of adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma. Similar analyses were designed to assess methodological variability with average within-eye standard deviation (SD) for repeated scans as the dependent variable.

Main Outcomes Measures

(1) Biological variability: average RNFL thickness, and (2) methodological variability: average within-participant SD across repeated scans.

Results

Age (β = 0.19 microns/year, [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.29, 0.09]), female gender (β = +1.48 microns vs. male, [95% CI: 0.09, 2.86]), axial length (β = 1.24 microns/mm of greater length, [95% CI: 1.80, 0.67]), and SS (β = +1.62 microns/1 unit greater SS, [95% CI: 1.16, 2.09]) were significantly associated with RNFL thickness, while race and ethnicity were not (P > 0.05). In analyses designed to assess methodological variability, higher RNFL thickness (β = +0.02 per micron increase, [95% CI: 0.01, 0.03]), and lower SS (β = +0.19 per 1 unit lower SS, [95% CI: 0.10, 0.27]) were significantly associated with greater RNFL variability. In adults with no self-reported history of glaucoma (n of eyes = 1165, n of participants = 712), female gender was not associated with RNFL, while African American race was associated with thicker RNFL (β = +4.65 microns vs. Whites, [95% CI: 1.28, 8.03]).

Conclusions

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness is lower with older age, male gender, greater axial length, lower SS, and Whites (as compared with African Americans) without self-reported glaucoma. Measurement variability (SD) is higher with greater RNFL thickness and lower SS. Understanding these biological and methodological variations is important to aid in OCT interpretation.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信