交流科学与障碍专业精神:考虑多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性

S. A. S. Lee, Amanda Jordan Byrd, E. Babatsouli, Kyomi Gregory-Martin, Monica Echeverry Wright
{"title":"交流科学与障碍专业精神:考虑多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性","authors":"S. A. S. Lee, Amanda Jordan Byrd, E. Babatsouli, Kyomi Gregory-Martin, Monica Echeverry Wright","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This tutorial aims to provide an in-depth discussion of professionalism in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) with consideration of diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. Students, practitioners, and faculty in CSD are taught and held to expectations of professionalism. However, criteria for professionalism often do not fully consider diversity, equity, inclusion, and access.\n \n \n \n Relevant literature on professionalism and diversity, equity, and inclusion is reviewed and summarized. Case scenarios are also shared to provide examples of how these aspects are not currently considered in the discipline of CSD.\n \n \n \n The current definitions of professionalism are vague and oftentimes exclude cultural differences. Because the majority of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association membership and leadership groups are from the mainstream culture, the definitions and attributes of professional norms have been influenced by mainstream culture.\n \n \n \n Recent publications on professionalism and professional behavior in medicine have discussed the impact of racialized professionalism norms on increasing diversity of medical students and trainees. It is imperative to resonate such issues in the CSD profession, because there is a growing number of students and practitioners from minority groups. This tutorial addresses how the discipline of CSD can reflect cultural responsiveness to the standards for students, practitioners, and faculty. Several solutions are suggested.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"38 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professionalism in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Consideration of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access\",\"authors\":\"S. A. S. Lee, Amanda Jordan Byrd, E. Babatsouli, Kyomi Gregory-Martin, Monica Echeverry Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This tutorial aims to provide an in-depth discussion of professionalism in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) with consideration of diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. Students, practitioners, and faculty in CSD are taught and held to expectations of professionalism. However, criteria for professionalism often do not fully consider diversity, equity, inclusion, and access.\\n \\n \\n \\n Relevant literature on professionalism and diversity, equity, and inclusion is reviewed and summarized. Case scenarios are also shared to provide examples of how these aspects are not currently considered in the discipline of CSD.\\n \\n \\n \\n The current definitions of professionalism are vague and oftentimes exclude cultural differences. Because the majority of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association membership and leadership groups are from the mainstream culture, the definitions and attributes of professional norms have been influenced by mainstream culture.\\n \\n \\n \\n Recent publications on professionalism and professional behavior in medicine have discussed the impact of racialized professionalism norms on increasing diversity of medical students and trainees. It is imperative to resonate such issues in the CSD profession, because there is a growing number of students and practitioners from minority groups. This tutorial addresses how the discipline of CSD can reflect cultural responsiveness to the standards for students, practitioners, and faculty. Several solutions are suggested.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"volume\":\"38 32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本教程旨在深入探讨传播科学与障碍(CSD)中的专业精神,同时考虑到多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性。传播科学与障碍专业的学生、从业人员和教职员工都接受过专业教育,并被寄予厚望。然而,专业精神的标准往往没有充分考虑到多样性、公平性、包容性和可及性。 本文回顾并总结了有关专业精神与多样性、公平性和包容性的相关文献。此外,还分享了一些案例,以举例说明目前在 CSD 学科中如何没有考虑到这些方面。 目前对专业精神的定义含糊不清,经常将文化差异排除在外。由于美国演讲-语言-听力协会的大多数会员和领导团体都来自主流文化,因此专业规范的定义和属性受到了主流文化的影响。 最近有关医学专业精神和专业行为的出版物讨论了种族化的专业精神规范对医学生和受训人员日益多样化的影响。由于来自少数族裔群体的学生和从业人员越来越多,因此在 CSD 专业中引起这些问题的共鸣势在必行。本教程探讨了 CSD 学科如何在学生、从业人员和教职员工的标准中体现文化响应性。提出了几种解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professionalism in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Consideration of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Access
This tutorial aims to provide an in-depth discussion of professionalism in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) with consideration of diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. Students, practitioners, and faculty in CSD are taught and held to expectations of professionalism. However, criteria for professionalism often do not fully consider diversity, equity, inclusion, and access. Relevant literature on professionalism and diversity, equity, and inclusion is reviewed and summarized. Case scenarios are also shared to provide examples of how these aspects are not currently considered in the discipline of CSD. The current definitions of professionalism are vague and oftentimes exclude cultural differences. Because the majority of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association membership and leadership groups are from the mainstream culture, the definitions and attributes of professional norms have been influenced by mainstream culture. Recent publications on professionalism and professional behavior in medicine have discussed the impact of racialized professionalism norms on increasing diversity of medical students and trainees. It is imperative to resonate such issues in the CSD profession, because there is a growing number of students and practitioners from minority groups. This tutorial addresses how the discipline of CSD can reflect cultural responsiveness to the standards for students, practitioners, and faculty. Several solutions are suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信