日常生活中享乐动机和幸福动机与幸福感关系中的人格和个体差异

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sjoerd van Halem , Eeske van Roekel , Jaap Denissen
{"title":"日常生活中享乐动机和幸福动机与幸福感关系中的人格和个体差异","authors":"Sjoerd van Halem ,&nbsp;Eeske van Roekel ,&nbsp;Jaap Denissen","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To understand the role of personality in the relationship between hedonic motives (e.g., pleasure), eudaimonic motives (e.g., excellence/meaning), and subjective well-being, we sampled 218 university students who completed an online questionnaire and a week of experience sampling surveys. Besides documenting the associations between personality and both motives, we found that the impact of both motives on average subjective well-being did not differ across different levels of the Big Five personality traits. Adding to these trait-level findings, we found that people high on neuroticism generally had more negative experiences when they did not engage in either motive. People high on neuroticism may have a lower setpoint of well-being compared to their peers but may equally benefit from engaging in either motive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400045X/pdfft?md5=806a77b354bddd41138c853c3420b3f7&pid=1-s2.0-S009265662400045X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality and individual differences in the relationship between hedonic and eudaimonic motives and well-being in daily life\",\"authors\":\"Sjoerd van Halem ,&nbsp;Eeske van Roekel ,&nbsp;Jaap Denissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To understand the role of personality in the relationship between hedonic motives (e.g., pleasure), eudaimonic motives (e.g., excellence/meaning), and subjective well-being, we sampled 218 university students who completed an online questionnaire and a week of experience sampling surveys. Besides documenting the associations between personality and both motives, we found that the impact of both motives on average subjective well-being did not differ across different levels of the Big Five personality traits. Adding to these trait-level findings, we found that people high on neuroticism generally had more negative experiences when they did not engage in either motive. People high on neuroticism may have a lower setpoint of well-being compared to their peers but may equally benefit from engaging in either motive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400045X/pdfft?md5=806a77b354bddd41138c853c3420b3f7&pid=1-s2.0-S009265662400045X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400045X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265662400045X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了了解人格在享乐动机(如快乐)、价值动机(如卓越/意义)与主观幸福感之间的关系中的作用,我们对 218 名大学生进行了抽样调查,他们完成了一份在线问卷和为期一周的经验抽样调查。除了记录人格与这两种动机之间的关联外,我们还发现这两种动机对平均主观幸福感的影响在大五人格特质的不同层次上并无差异。除了这些特质层面的发现之外,我们还发现,神经质高的人在不参与这两种动机时,通常会有更多的负面体验。与同龄人相比,神经质程度高的人的幸福感设定值可能较低,但他们同样可以从参与两种动机中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personality and individual differences in the relationship between hedonic and eudaimonic motives and well-being in daily life

To understand the role of personality in the relationship between hedonic motives (e.g., pleasure), eudaimonic motives (e.g., excellence/meaning), and subjective well-being, we sampled 218 university students who completed an online questionnaire and a week of experience sampling surveys. Besides documenting the associations between personality and both motives, we found that the impact of both motives on average subjective well-being did not differ across different levels of the Big Five personality traits. Adding to these trait-level findings, we found that people high on neuroticism generally had more negative experiences when they did not engage in either motive. People high on neuroticism may have a lower setpoint of well-being compared to their peers but may equally benefit from engaging in either motive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信