外貌与表现增强补充剂/物质使用量表(APES):开发和初步心理计量分析

IF 2.9 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Marita Cooper , Richard Hicks , Kathleen M Griffiths
{"title":"外貌与表现增强补充剂/物质使用量表(APES):开发和初步心理计量分析","authors":"Marita Cooper ,&nbsp;Richard Hicks ,&nbsp;Kathleen M Griffiths","doi":"10.1016/j.peh.2024.100281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of both licit and illicit appearance and performance-enhancing drugs (APED) has been recognized as a key public health concern. While it is estimated that rates of APED usage in non-athlete populations is increasing, true prevalence studies are limited by a lack of psychometrically reliable and valid measures. This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a survey tool for assessing APED usage.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Initial items for the Appearance and Performance Enhancing Supplement/Substance Use Scale (APES) were seven licit and 13 illicit APED. Following a preliminary exploration, we evaluated the concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the APES in a community sample of 265 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The APES demonstrated strong internal consistency, medium to strong concurrent validity, and good to excellent test-retest reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results provide preliminary support for the reliability and the validity of APES scores in assessing both licit and illicit APED usage. Future studies are recommended to replicate and extend the psychometric investigations reported here to encompass additional validation studies and populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19886,"journal":{"name":"Performance enhancement and health","volume":"12 2","pages":"Article 100281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266924000136/pdfft?md5=b937363731955a5ac29a9a542b56e49e&pid=1-s2.0-S2211266924000136-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Appearance and Performance Enhancing supplement/substance use Scale (APES): Development and preliminary psychometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Marita Cooper ,&nbsp;Richard Hicks ,&nbsp;Kathleen M Griffiths\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.peh.2024.100281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of both licit and illicit appearance and performance-enhancing drugs (APED) has been recognized as a key public health concern. While it is estimated that rates of APED usage in non-athlete populations is increasing, true prevalence studies are limited by a lack of psychometrically reliable and valid measures. This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a survey tool for assessing APED usage.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Initial items for the Appearance and Performance Enhancing Supplement/Substance Use Scale (APES) were seven licit and 13 illicit APED. Following a preliminary exploration, we evaluated the concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the APES in a community sample of 265 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The APES demonstrated strong internal consistency, medium to strong concurrent validity, and good to excellent test-retest reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results provide preliminary support for the reliability and the validity of APES scores in assessing both licit and illicit APED usage. Future studies are recommended to replicate and extend the psychometric investigations reported here to encompass additional validation studies and populations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance enhancement and health\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266924000136/pdfft?md5=b937363731955a5ac29a9a542b56e49e&pid=1-s2.0-S2211266924000136-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance enhancement and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266924000136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance enhancement and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211266924000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景使用合法和非法的外观和体能增强药物(APED)已被认为是一个重要的公共卫生问题。据估计,非运动员群体中使用 APED 的比例正在上升,但由于缺乏心理计量学上可靠有效的测量方法,真正的流行率研究受到了限制。本文介绍了一种用于评估 APED 使用情况的调查工具的开发和心理测量学评估。方法 "外观和表现增强补充剂/物质使用量表"(APES)的初始项目为 7 种合法和 13 种非法 APED。结果APES表现出较强的内部一致性、中等到较强的并发效度以及良好到极佳的测试-再测可靠性。结论这些结果初步支持了APES评分在评估合法和非法APED使用情况方面的可靠性和有效性。建议今后开展研究,复制并扩展本文所报告的心理测量调查,以涵盖更多的验证研究和人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Appearance and Performance Enhancing supplement/substance use Scale (APES): Development and preliminary psychometric analysis

Background

The use of both licit and illicit appearance and performance-enhancing drugs (APED) has been recognized as a key public health concern. While it is estimated that rates of APED usage in non-athlete populations is increasing, true prevalence studies are limited by a lack of psychometrically reliable and valid measures. This paper describes the development and psychometric evaluation of a survey tool for assessing APED usage.

Method

Initial items for the Appearance and Performance Enhancing Supplement/Substance Use Scale (APES) were seven licit and 13 illicit APED. Following a preliminary exploration, we evaluated the concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the APES in a community sample of 265 participants.

Results

The APES demonstrated strong internal consistency, medium to strong concurrent validity, and good to excellent test-retest reliability.

Conclusions

These results provide preliminary support for the reliability and the validity of APES scores in assessing both licit and illicit APED usage. Future studies are recommended to replicate and extend the psychometric investigations reported here to encompass additional validation studies and populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Performance enhancement and health
Performance enhancement and health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信