针灸治疗化疗或放疗后白细胞减少症的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Yunpeng Deng , Huanhuan Zhang , Tengteng Wei , Guangshuai He , Zhixin Zhu , Shuning Zhang , Meijun Liu , Jingjing Xue , Weixing Zhang , Xuguang Yang
{"title":"针灸治疗化疗或放疗后白细胞减少症的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Yunpeng Deng ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Tengteng Wei ,&nbsp;Guangshuai He ,&nbsp;Zhixin Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuning Zhang ,&nbsp;Meijun Liu ,&nbsp;Jingjing Xue ,&nbsp;Weixing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuguang Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acupuncture-Moxibustion Therapy (AMT) has been used to treat leukopenia associated with cancer treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and degree of evidence of AMT in the treatment of post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four English databases (The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science) and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and WanFang Database) were searched from inception to February 6, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia with AMT. Two authors extracted data and assessed the quality of trials through the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 independently. All meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 and GRADE was usually used to measure the certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 18 RCTs with 1,377 patients. The results showed that in treating post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia, AMT is more effective compared to Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) (e.g., the effective rate: risk ratio (RR)=1.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16 to 1.53, 3 RCTs, 349 cases; the white blood cell count (WBC): standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.03, 95 %CI 0.04 to 2.01, 2 RCTs, 148 cases), experimental synthetic drugs (ESDs) (e.g., the effective rate: RR=1.35, 95 %CI 1.13 to 1.61, 3 RCTs, 184 cases; the WBC: SMD=1.43, 95 %CI 1.21 to 1.65, 3 RCTs, 244 cases). AMT in combination with myeloid growth factors (MGFs) significantly improved the effective rate (RR=1.21, 95 %CI 1.09 to 1.35, 3 RCTs, 187 cases) and WBC (SMD=1.86, 95 %CI 1.56 to 2.17, 2 RCTs, 117 cases) compared to MGFs. However, there are no data to support the benefits of AMT or in combination with drugs in terms of Karnofsky performance status scores. The certainty of the overall evidence is very low due to the small sample sizes and poor quality of the included RCTs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Very low certainty evidence suggests that AMT may be an effective complementary therapy for post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia. The present evidence does not support a definitive safety profile for AMT. However, the quality of the current studies are low, and these conclusions need to be further validated by conducting more high quality RCTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187638202400043X/pdfft?md5=aff8faba0e1cc7840759810f3f4a627a&pid=1-s2.0-S187638202400043X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for leukopenia after chemotherapy or radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Deng ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Tengteng Wei ,&nbsp;Guangshuai He ,&nbsp;Zhixin Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuning Zhang ,&nbsp;Meijun Liu ,&nbsp;Jingjing Xue ,&nbsp;Weixing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuguang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Acupuncture-Moxibustion Therapy (AMT) has been used to treat leukopenia associated with cancer treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and degree of evidence of AMT in the treatment of post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four English databases (The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science) and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and WanFang Database) were searched from inception to February 6, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia with AMT. Two authors extracted data and assessed the quality of trials through the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 independently. All meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 and GRADE was usually used to measure the certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis included 18 RCTs with 1,377 patients. The results showed that in treating post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia, AMT is more effective compared to Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) (e.g., the effective rate: risk ratio (RR)=1.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16 to 1.53, 3 RCTs, 349 cases; the white blood cell count (WBC): standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.03, 95 %CI 0.04 to 2.01, 2 RCTs, 148 cases), experimental synthetic drugs (ESDs) (e.g., the effective rate: RR=1.35, 95 %CI 1.13 to 1.61, 3 RCTs, 184 cases; the WBC: SMD=1.43, 95 %CI 1.21 to 1.65, 3 RCTs, 244 cases). AMT in combination with myeloid growth factors (MGFs) significantly improved the effective rate (RR=1.21, 95 %CI 1.09 to 1.35, 3 RCTs, 187 cases) and WBC (SMD=1.86, 95 %CI 1.56 to 2.17, 2 RCTs, 117 cases) compared to MGFs. However, there are no data to support the benefits of AMT or in combination with drugs in terms of Karnofsky performance status scores. The certainty of the overall evidence is very low due to the small sample sizes and poor quality of the included RCTs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Very low certainty evidence suggests that AMT may be an effective complementary therapy for post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia. The present evidence does not support a definitive safety profile for AMT. However, the quality of the current studies are low, and these conclusions need to be further validated by conducting more high quality RCTs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187638202400043X/pdfft?md5=aff8faba0e1cc7840759810f3f4a627a&pid=1-s2.0-S187638202400043X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187638202400043X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187638202400043X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:针灸疗法(AMT)一直被用于治疗癌症治疗后的白细胞减少症。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 AMT 治疗化疗后白细胞减少症的临床疗效、安全性和证据程度。方法检索了四个英文数据库(The Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science)和四个中文数据库(中国生物医学数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和万方数据库)中从开始到2023年2月6日有关AMT治疗化疗后白细胞减少症的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者通过科克伦偏倚风险工具 2.0 独立提取数据并评估试验质量。所有荟萃分析均使用Review Manager 5.4.1进行,并通常使用GRADE来衡量证据的确定性。结果显示,在治疗化疗后白细胞减少症方面,AMT 比中草药(CHM)更有效(如:有效率:风险比(RR);有效率:风险比(RR);有效率:风险比(RR);有效率:风险比(RR)))、有效率:风险比(RR)=1.33,95 % 置信区间(CI)1.16 至 1.53,3 项研究,349 例;白细胞计数(WBC):标准化平均差(SMD)=1.03,95 %CI 0.04 至 2.01,2 项研究,148 例)、实验性合成药物(ESD)(如有效率:RR=1.35,95 %CI 1.13 至 1.61,3 项 RCT,184 例;WBC:SMD=1.43,95 %CI 1.21 至 1.65,3 项 RCT,244 例)。与骨髓生长因子(MGFs)相比,AMT与骨髓生长因子(MGFs)联合使用可显著提高有效率(RR=1.21,95 %CI 1.09 至 1.35,3 项研究,187 例)和白细胞计数(SMD=1.86,95 %CI 1.56 至 2.17,2 项研究,117 例)。然而,没有数据支持 AMT 或与药物联合使用对 Karnofsky 表 现状态评分的益处。由于纳入的 RCTs 样本规模小、质量差,因此总体证据的确定性很低。结论确定性很低的证据表明,AMT 可能是化疗后白细胞减少症的有效辅助疗法。目前的证据并不支持AMT的明确安全性。然而,目前的研究质量较低,这些结论需要通过进行更多高质量的临床试验来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for leukopenia after chemotherapy or radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Acupuncture-Moxibustion Therapy (AMT) has been used to treat leukopenia associated with cancer treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical efficacy, safety, and degree of evidence of AMT in the treatment of post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia.

Methods

Four English databases (The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science) and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and WanFang Database) were searched from inception to February 6, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia with AMT. Two authors extracted data and assessed the quality of trials through the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 independently. All meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 and GRADE was usually used to measure the certainty of evidence.

Results

The analysis included 18 RCTs with 1,377 patients. The results showed that in treating post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia, AMT is more effective compared to Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) (e.g., the effective rate: risk ratio (RR)=1.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16 to 1.53, 3 RCTs, 349 cases; the white blood cell count (WBC): standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.03, 95 %CI 0.04 to 2.01, 2 RCTs, 148 cases), experimental synthetic drugs (ESDs) (e.g., the effective rate: RR=1.35, 95 %CI 1.13 to 1.61, 3 RCTs, 184 cases; the WBC: SMD=1.43, 95 %CI 1.21 to 1.65, 3 RCTs, 244 cases). AMT in combination with myeloid growth factors (MGFs) significantly improved the effective rate (RR=1.21, 95 %CI 1.09 to 1.35, 3 RCTs, 187 cases) and WBC (SMD=1.86, 95 %CI 1.56 to 2.17, 2 RCTs, 117 cases) compared to MGFs. However, there are no data to support the benefits of AMT or in combination with drugs in terms of Karnofsky performance status scores. The certainty of the overall evidence is very low due to the small sample sizes and poor quality of the included RCTs.

Conclusions

Very low certainty evidence suggests that AMT may be an effective complementary therapy for post-chemoradiotherapy leukopenia. The present evidence does not support a definitive safety profile for AMT. However, the quality of the current studies are low, and these conclusions need to be further validated by conducting more high quality RCTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信