摘要 PO2-22-08:保乳手术治疗和乳晕周围乳房整形术后乳头乳晕复合体的变化:三维表面分析

IF 3.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, R. Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann
{"title":"摘要 PO2-22-08:保乳手术治疗和乳晕周围乳房整形术后乳头乳晕复合体的变化:三维表面分析","authors":"Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, R. Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-22-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives: The position and configuration of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have a high impact on satisfaction (objective and subjective) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The aim of this study is to objectively measure the changes in the NAC after breast conservation surgery by the use of the 3D whole body scanner and compare its results with the outcome reported by the patients. This will support further patients and help physicians to tailor their technique prior to breast-conserving surgery. Methods: In a unicentric pilot project 6 months after BET with periareolar mastopexy and adjuvant radiation between 2019 and 2022, 38 women were studied. The mean age was 56.3 ±11.6 and BMI was 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m². Objective 3D parameters were collected using the Vectra Whole Body Surface Imaging System (WB360) based on breast and NAC dimensions. In addition, the patients received the BCT module and the mastopexy module items about satisfaction with the NAC from the BREAST Q questionnaire. Results: In a group of 38 women, BCT with periareolar mastopexy and irradiation showed a small but significant change in NAC position and shape (see Table 1). This small change is matched by the high satisfaction with the nipple and areola surveyed in the BREAST-Q questionnaire. More than 66% of the women were rather satisfied or very satisfied. The BREAST-Q results from the Items about satisfaction with the nipple and areola are shown in Table 2. However, 34% of participants reported being somewhat dissatisfied to very dissatisfied with the symmetry of placement. This could be due to a significant cumulative small change in nipple-sternal notch distance and nipple-midline distance. No significant difference was found when measuring the nipple-inframammary fold distance (p=0.649). The absolute difference was of 0.13 ± 1.22 mm. The change in breast diameter was of 0.55 ± 1.54 mm (relative 2,75 ± 7.95%). There was also no significance (p=0.042). This indicates that after BCT, the nipple-inframammary fold distance and breast diameter did not change significantly. Breast volume decreases insignificantly by 49.2 ± 136.1 cc (relative 12,96 ± 33.51) on the operated side (p=0.009). In particular, a difference in vertical diameter of the NAC of -4,79 mm (14,27%) was observed between the non-operated and the operated breast (p=0.005 by Wilcoxon-test). The BREAST-Q BCT Module consists of 8 domains. The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction with the questioned item. In our sample of 38 women, satisfaction with the surgeon(s) was highest (BREAST-Q score of 83,97 ± 19,12). The mean Q score for satisfaction with \"psychosocial well-being\" is 67,47 ± 22,03. For the item \"sexual well-being\", only 35 women answered sufficient questions and the mean Q score was 54,42 ± 16,43. “Satisfaction with breast” had a Q-score of 61,03 ± 19,36. The questions about \"physical well-being\" had a mean of 70,11 ± 16,69. The Q-score for “satisfaction with medical team”, “with office staff”, and “with information” can be seen in Table 3. Conclusions: In a nutshell, the conclusion of this study is that the Vectra XT 3D-Imaging is a useful tool to assess the cosmetic outcome in terms of NAC position and shape. Hence, it is a helpful tool to support the planning of the surgery and may have a positive impact on the outcome. Postoperatively, there was only a slight change in the NAC dimension and position compared with intraoperative planning. The 3D Surface Analysis is most useful in assessing the quality of reconstruction after BCT and additionally the NAC is therefore an important factor for patient satisfaction. Results of a multicenter study are pending.\n Table 1: Descriptive statistic and Wilcoxon-test Results from the measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position (n=38)\n The 3D Measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position\n Table 2: Results from the BREAST-Q mastopexy modul about satisfaction with the nipples (n=38)\n Satisfaction with the nipples\n Table 3: Results from the BREAST-Q BCT Modul after BCT and periareolar mastopexy und adjuvant radiation (n=38)\n BREAST-Q Scores\n Citation Format: Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann. Nipple areolar complex changes after breast-conserving surgical therapy and periareolar mastopexy: a three-dimensional Surface Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-08.","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"78 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract PO2-22-08: Nipple areolar complex changes after breast-conserving surgical therapy and periareolar mastopexy: a three-dimensional Surface Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, R. Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-22-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Objectives: The position and configuration of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have a high impact on satisfaction (objective and subjective) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The aim of this study is to objectively measure the changes in the NAC after breast conservation surgery by the use of the 3D whole body scanner and compare its results with the outcome reported by the patients. This will support further patients and help physicians to tailor their technique prior to breast-conserving surgery. Methods: In a unicentric pilot project 6 months after BET with periareolar mastopexy and adjuvant radiation between 2019 and 2022, 38 women were studied. The mean age was 56.3 ±11.6 and BMI was 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m². Objective 3D parameters were collected using the Vectra Whole Body Surface Imaging System (WB360) based on breast and NAC dimensions. In addition, the patients received the BCT module and the mastopexy module items about satisfaction with the NAC from the BREAST Q questionnaire. Results: In a group of 38 women, BCT with periareolar mastopexy and irradiation showed a small but significant change in NAC position and shape (see Table 1). This small change is matched by the high satisfaction with the nipple and areola surveyed in the BREAST-Q questionnaire. More than 66% of the women were rather satisfied or very satisfied. The BREAST-Q results from the Items about satisfaction with the nipple and areola are shown in Table 2. However, 34% of participants reported being somewhat dissatisfied to very dissatisfied with the symmetry of placement. This could be due to a significant cumulative small change in nipple-sternal notch distance and nipple-midline distance. No significant difference was found when measuring the nipple-inframammary fold distance (p=0.649). The absolute difference was of 0.13 ± 1.22 mm. The change in breast diameter was of 0.55 ± 1.54 mm (relative 2,75 ± 7.95%). There was also no significance (p=0.042). This indicates that after BCT, the nipple-inframammary fold distance and breast diameter did not change significantly. Breast volume decreases insignificantly by 49.2 ± 136.1 cc (relative 12,96 ± 33.51) on the operated side (p=0.009). In particular, a difference in vertical diameter of the NAC of -4,79 mm (14,27%) was observed between the non-operated and the operated breast (p=0.005 by Wilcoxon-test). The BREAST-Q BCT Module consists of 8 domains. The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction with the questioned item. In our sample of 38 women, satisfaction with the surgeon(s) was highest (BREAST-Q score of 83,97 ± 19,12). The mean Q score for satisfaction with \\\"psychosocial well-being\\\" is 67,47 ± 22,03. For the item \\\"sexual well-being\\\", only 35 women answered sufficient questions and the mean Q score was 54,42 ± 16,43. “Satisfaction with breast” had a Q-score of 61,03 ± 19,36. The questions about \\\"physical well-being\\\" had a mean of 70,11 ± 16,69. The Q-score for “satisfaction with medical team”, “with office staff”, and “with information” can be seen in Table 3. Conclusions: In a nutshell, the conclusion of this study is that the Vectra XT 3D-Imaging is a useful tool to assess the cosmetic outcome in terms of NAC position and shape. Hence, it is a helpful tool to support the planning of the surgery and may have a positive impact on the outcome. Postoperatively, there was only a slight change in the NAC dimension and position compared with intraoperative planning. The 3D Surface Analysis is most useful in assessing the quality of reconstruction after BCT and additionally the NAC is therefore an important factor for patient satisfaction. Results of a multicenter study are pending.\\n Table 1: Descriptive statistic and Wilcoxon-test Results from the measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position (n=38)\\n The 3D Measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position\\n Table 2: Results from the BREAST-Q mastopexy modul about satisfaction with the nipples (n=38)\\n Satisfaction with the nipples\\n Table 3: Results from the BREAST-Q BCT Modul after BCT and periareolar mastopexy und adjuvant radiation (n=38)\\n BREAST-Q Scores\\n Citation Format: Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann. Nipple areolar complex changes after breast-conserving surgical therapy and periareolar mastopexy: a three-dimensional Surface Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-08.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Chemical Health & Safety\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Chemical Health & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-22-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-22-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的位置和结构对保乳治疗(BCT)后的满意度(客观和主观)有很大影响。本研究旨在使用三维全身扫描仪客观测量保乳术后乳头乳晕复合体的变化,并将其结果与患者报告的结果进行比较。这将为更多患者提供支持,并帮助医生在保乳手术前调整其技术。方法在2019年至2022年期间进行的一项单中心试点项目中,对38名女性进行了研究,她们在BET术后6个月接受了乳晕周围乳房整形术和辅助放射治疗。平均年龄为 56.3 ± 11.6 岁,体重指数为 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m²。使用 Vectra 全身表面成像系统 (WB360) 收集了基于乳房和 NAC 尺寸的客观 3D 参数。此外,患者还接受了 BREAST Q 问卷中有关 NAC 满意度的 BCT 模块和乳房整形模块项目。结果:在一组 38 名妇女中,BCT 与乳晕周围乳房整形术和照射术对 NAC 的位置和形状有微小但显著的改变(见表 1)。这一微小变化与 BREAST-Q 问卷调查中对乳头和乳晕的高度满意度相吻合。超过 66% 的女性表示比较满意或非常满意。表 2 列出了 BREAST-Q 问卷中有关乳头和乳晕满意度项目的结果。然而,34% 的参与者表示对乳头和乳晕的对称性有些不满意或非常不满意。这可能是由于乳头-胸骨切迹距离和乳头-中线距离的显著累积微小变化造成的。在测量乳头-乳房褶皱距离时未发现明显差异(P=0.649)。绝对差异为 0.13 ± 1.22 毫米。乳房直径的变化为 0.55 ± 1.54 毫米(相对值为 2,75 ± 7.95%)。差异也不显著(P=0.042)。这表明 BCT 后,乳头-乳房褶皱距离和乳房直径没有显著变化。手术侧乳房体积减少了 49.2 ± 136.1 毫升(相对值为 12,96 ± 33.51),差异不明显(P=0.009)。特别是,未手术乳房和手术乳房的 NAC 垂直直径相差-4.79 毫米(14.27%)(通过 Wilcoxon-test 检验,p=0.005)。BREAST-Q BCT 模块由 8 个领域组成。得分越高,对问题项目的满意度越高。在我们的 38 位女性样本中,对外科医生的满意度最高(BREAST-Q 得分为 83.97 ± 19.12)。对 "社会心理健康 "满意度的平均 Q 值为 67,47 ± 22,03。对于 "性健康 "项目,只有 35 名妇女回答了足够的问题,平均 Q 得分为 54,42 ± 16,43。"对乳房的满意度 "的 Q 值为 61.03 ± 19.36。有关 "身体健康 "的问题的平均值为 70.11 ± 16.69。表 3 列出了 "对医疗团队的满意度"、"对办公室工作人员的满意度 "和 "对信息的满意度 "的 Q 值。结论总而言之,本研究的结论是,Vectra XT 三维成像是评估 NAC 位置和形状的美容效果的有效工具。因此,它是支持手术规划的有用工具,并可能对手术效果产生积极影响。术后,NAC 的尺寸和位置与术中规划相比仅有轻微变化。三维表面分析在评估 BCT 术后重建质量方面非常有用,因此,NAC 也是影响患者满意度的一个重要因素。一项多中心研究的结果尚未公布。表 1:乳房和 NAC 尺寸与位置测量的描述性统计和 Wilcoxon 检验结果(n=38) 乳房和 NAC 尺寸与位置的 3D 测量结果 表 2:BREAST-Q 乳房整形术模型关于乳头满意度的结果(n=38) 乳头满意度 表 3:BCT和乳晕周围乳房整形术及辅助放射治疗后的 BREAST-Q BCT 模型结果(38 人) BREAST-Q 评分 引用格式:Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann.保乳手术治疗和乳晕周围乳房整形术后乳头乳晕复合体的变化:三维表面分析[摘要]。In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-08.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract PO2-22-08: Nipple areolar complex changes after breast-conserving surgical therapy and periareolar mastopexy: a three-dimensional Surface Analysis
Objectives: The position and configuration of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) have a high impact on satisfaction (objective and subjective) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The aim of this study is to objectively measure the changes in the NAC after breast conservation surgery by the use of the 3D whole body scanner and compare its results with the outcome reported by the patients. This will support further patients and help physicians to tailor their technique prior to breast-conserving surgery. Methods: In a unicentric pilot project 6 months after BET with periareolar mastopexy and adjuvant radiation between 2019 and 2022, 38 women were studied. The mean age was 56.3 ±11.6 and BMI was 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m². Objective 3D parameters were collected using the Vectra Whole Body Surface Imaging System (WB360) based on breast and NAC dimensions. In addition, the patients received the BCT module and the mastopexy module items about satisfaction with the NAC from the BREAST Q questionnaire. Results: In a group of 38 women, BCT with periareolar mastopexy and irradiation showed a small but significant change in NAC position and shape (see Table 1). This small change is matched by the high satisfaction with the nipple and areola surveyed in the BREAST-Q questionnaire. More than 66% of the women were rather satisfied or very satisfied. The BREAST-Q results from the Items about satisfaction with the nipple and areola are shown in Table 2. However, 34% of participants reported being somewhat dissatisfied to very dissatisfied with the symmetry of placement. This could be due to a significant cumulative small change in nipple-sternal notch distance and nipple-midline distance. No significant difference was found when measuring the nipple-inframammary fold distance (p=0.649). The absolute difference was of 0.13 ± 1.22 mm. The change in breast diameter was of 0.55 ± 1.54 mm (relative 2,75 ± 7.95%). There was also no significance (p=0.042). This indicates that after BCT, the nipple-inframammary fold distance and breast diameter did not change significantly. Breast volume decreases insignificantly by 49.2 ± 136.1 cc (relative 12,96 ± 33.51) on the operated side (p=0.009). In particular, a difference in vertical diameter of the NAC of -4,79 mm (14,27%) was observed between the non-operated and the operated breast (p=0.005 by Wilcoxon-test). The BREAST-Q BCT Module consists of 8 domains. The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction with the questioned item. In our sample of 38 women, satisfaction with the surgeon(s) was highest (BREAST-Q score of 83,97 ± 19,12). The mean Q score for satisfaction with "psychosocial well-being" is 67,47 ± 22,03. For the item "sexual well-being", only 35 women answered sufficient questions and the mean Q score was 54,42 ± 16,43. “Satisfaction with breast” had a Q-score of 61,03 ± 19,36. The questions about "physical well-being" had a mean of 70,11 ± 16,69. The Q-score for “satisfaction with medical team”, “with office staff”, and “with information” can be seen in Table 3. Conclusions: In a nutshell, the conclusion of this study is that the Vectra XT 3D-Imaging is a useful tool to assess the cosmetic outcome in terms of NAC position and shape. Hence, it is a helpful tool to support the planning of the surgery and may have a positive impact on the outcome. Postoperatively, there was only a slight change in the NAC dimension and position compared with intraoperative planning. The 3D Surface Analysis is most useful in assessing the quality of reconstruction after BCT and additionally the NAC is therefore an important factor for patient satisfaction. Results of a multicenter study are pending. Table 1: Descriptive statistic and Wilcoxon-test Results from the measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position (n=38) The 3D Measures from the Breast and from NAC Dimension and Position Table 2: Results from the BREAST-Q mastopexy modul about satisfaction with the nipples (n=38) Satisfaction with the nipples Table 3: Results from the BREAST-Q BCT Modul after BCT and periareolar mastopexy und adjuvant radiation (n=38) BREAST-Q Scores Citation Format: Therese Peter, Konstantin Koban, Denis Ehrl, Pamina Geiger, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann. Nipple areolar complex changes after breast-conserving surgical therapy and periareolar mastopexy: a three-dimensional Surface Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-08.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
ACS Chemical Health & Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信