关于涉及两块非平行板之间流动的 MHD 杰弗里-哈梅尔问题的求解,以及血液流动的应用

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1002/htj.23064
Atallah El-Shenawy, Mohamed El-Gamel, Mahmoud Abd El-Hady
{"title":"关于涉及两块非平行板之间流动的 MHD 杰弗里-哈梅尔问题的求解,以及血液流动的应用","authors":"Atallah El-Shenawy,&nbsp;Mohamed El-Gamel,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abd El-Hady","doi":"10.1002/htj.23064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Jeffery–Hamel flow phenomenon appears in a variety of real-world applications involving the flow of two nonparallel plates. BY using a similarity transformation derived from the equation of continuity, partial differential equations determining flow characteristics are translated into nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The problem involves the flow of a specific type of fluid, namely, an incompressible and electrically conducting fluid, between two nonparallel plates. The flow is assumed to be steady, two-dimensional, and subject to certain boundary conditions. Specifically, the plates are impermeable, and the fluid adheres to a no-slip condition, resulting in zero fluid velocity at the plates' surfaces. Moreover, the problem incorporates the effects of magnetic fields and pressure fluctuations, making it highly applicable to scenarios, such as blood flow through arteries in the human body, which can be modeled as a special case of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Jeffery–Hamel problem referred to as the (MHD) blood pressure equation. This work compares two numerical approaches for solving the MHDs Jeffery–Hamel problem: B-spline and Bernstein polynomial collocation. The given approaches are used to discretize and transform the equation into a system of algebraic equations. Matrix algebra techniques are then used to solve the resultant system. A complete error analysis and convergence rates for different grid sizes are derived for both methods and are used to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the two approaches. Both approaches produce correct solutions, according to the numerical findings, although the Bernstein polynomial collocation method is more efficient and accurate than the B-spline collocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":"53 6","pages":"2905-2933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the solution of MHD Jeffery–Hamel problem involving flow between two nonparallel plates with a blood flow application\",\"authors\":\"Atallah El-Shenawy,&nbsp;Mohamed El-Gamel,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abd El-Hady\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/htj.23064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Jeffery–Hamel flow phenomenon appears in a variety of real-world applications involving the flow of two nonparallel plates. BY using a similarity transformation derived from the equation of continuity, partial differential equations determining flow characteristics are translated into nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The problem involves the flow of a specific type of fluid, namely, an incompressible and electrically conducting fluid, between two nonparallel plates. The flow is assumed to be steady, two-dimensional, and subject to certain boundary conditions. Specifically, the plates are impermeable, and the fluid adheres to a no-slip condition, resulting in zero fluid velocity at the plates' surfaces. Moreover, the problem incorporates the effects of magnetic fields and pressure fluctuations, making it highly applicable to scenarios, such as blood flow through arteries in the human body, which can be modeled as a special case of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Jeffery–Hamel problem referred to as the (MHD) blood pressure equation. This work compares two numerical approaches for solving the MHDs Jeffery–Hamel problem: B-spline and Bernstein polynomial collocation. The given approaches are used to discretize and transform the equation into a system of algebraic equations. Matrix algebra techniques are then used to solve the resultant system. A complete error analysis and convergence rates for different grid sizes are derived for both methods and are used to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the two approaches. Both approaches produce correct solutions, according to the numerical findings, although the Bernstein polynomial collocation method is more efficient and accurate than the B-spline collocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"2905-2933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杰弗里-哈梅尔流动现象出现在涉及两个非平行板流动的各种实际应用中。通过使用从连续性方程导出的相似性变换,决定流动特性的偏微分方程被转化为非线性常微分方程。问题涉及一种特定类型的流体,即不可压缩的导电流体,在两块不平行板之间的流动。假定流动是稳定的、二维的,并受某些边界条件的限制。具体来说,板是不可渗透的,流体遵守无滑动条件,导致板表面的流体速度为零。此外,该问题还包含磁场和压力波动的影响,因此非常适用于人体动脉血流等情况,可作为磁流体力学(MHD)杰弗里-哈梅尔问题的特例进行建模,称为(MHD)血压方程。本研究比较了两种解决 MHD 杰弗里-哈梅尔问题的数值方法:B-样条曲线和伯恩斯坦多项式配置。给出的方法用于将方程离散化并转化为代数方程系统。然后使用矩阵代数技术求解结果系统。两种方法都得出了完整的误差分析和不同网格大小的收敛率,并用于比较两种方法的精度和效率。根据数值结果,两种方法都能得出正确的解,但伯恩斯坦多项式配位法比 B-样条曲线配位法更有效、更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the solution of MHD Jeffery–Hamel problem involving flow between two nonparallel plates with a blood flow application

The Jeffery–Hamel flow phenomenon appears in a variety of real-world applications involving the flow of two nonparallel plates. BY using a similarity transformation derived from the equation of continuity, partial differential equations determining flow characteristics are translated into nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The problem involves the flow of a specific type of fluid, namely, an incompressible and electrically conducting fluid, between two nonparallel plates. The flow is assumed to be steady, two-dimensional, and subject to certain boundary conditions. Specifically, the plates are impermeable, and the fluid adheres to a no-slip condition, resulting in zero fluid velocity at the plates' surfaces. Moreover, the problem incorporates the effects of magnetic fields and pressure fluctuations, making it highly applicable to scenarios, such as blood flow through arteries in the human body, which can be modeled as a special case of the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Jeffery–Hamel problem referred to as the (MHD) blood pressure equation. This work compares two numerical approaches for solving the MHDs Jeffery–Hamel problem: B-spline and Bernstein polynomial collocation. The given approaches are used to discretize and transform the equation into a system of algebraic equations. Matrix algebra techniques are then used to solve the resultant system. A complete error analysis and convergence rates for different grid sizes are derived for both methods and are used to compare the accuracy and efficiency of the two approaches. Both approaches produce correct solutions, according to the numerical findings, although the Bernstein polynomial collocation method is more efficient and accurate than the B-spline collocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信