被唤醒的品牌?耐克与时尚工业综合体中企业社会责任(CSR)局限性分析

Sha’Mira Covington, Katalin Medvedev
{"title":"被唤醒的品牌?耐克与时尚工业综合体中企业社会责任(CSR)局限性分析","authors":"Sha’Mira Covington, Katalin Medvedev","doi":"10.1386/fspc_00256_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era marked by heightened social consciousness and impacted by Black Lives Matter (BLM), fashion brands worldwide endeavour to position themselves as socially responsible. This study scrutinizes Nike, a global leader in the fashion-industrial complex, and its ‘woke’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices. By conducting a detailed case study of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives and analysing social media user comments, the research seeks to unveil the tensions and constraints of ‘woke’ CSR. The study investigates the social media discourse surrounding Nike’s image, focusing on racial consciousness and concludes that the brand’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives are not transformative; they merely perform wokeness. The analysis uncovered three common themes in the social media data: (1) the commodification of BLM, (2) commodity activism and (3) woke-washing. By examining the limits of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR practices within the fashion-industrial complex, this study provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for brands seeking to meet socially conscious consumers’ evolving expectations.","PeriodicalId":513751,"journal":{"name":"Fashion, Style & Popular Culture","volume":"80 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A woke brand? An analysis of Nike and the limits of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the fashion-industrial complex\",\"authors\":\"Sha’Mira Covington, Katalin Medvedev\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/fspc_00256_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an era marked by heightened social consciousness and impacted by Black Lives Matter (BLM), fashion brands worldwide endeavour to position themselves as socially responsible. This study scrutinizes Nike, a global leader in the fashion-industrial complex, and its ‘woke’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices. By conducting a detailed case study of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives and analysing social media user comments, the research seeks to unveil the tensions and constraints of ‘woke’ CSR. The study investigates the social media discourse surrounding Nike’s image, focusing on racial consciousness and concludes that the brand’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives are not transformative; they merely perform wokeness. The analysis uncovered three common themes in the social media data: (1) the commodification of BLM, (2) commodity activism and (3) woke-washing. By examining the limits of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR practices within the fashion-industrial complex, this study provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for brands seeking to meet socially conscious consumers’ evolving expectations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fashion, Style & Popular Culture\",\"volume\":\"80 S1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fashion, Style & Popular Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00256_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fashion, Style & Popular Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00256_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这个社会意识高涨的时代,在 "黑人生命至上"(Black Lives Matter,BLM)的影响下,全球时尚品牌都在努力将自己定位为具有社会责任感的品牌。本研究对耐克--全球时尚工业综合体的领导者--及其 "觉醒 "的企业社会责任(CSR)实践进行了仔细研究。通过对耐克的 "觉醒 "企业社会责任举措进行详细的案例研究,并分析社交媒体用户的评论,本研究试图揭示 "觉醒 "企业社会责任的紧张关系和制约因素。研究调查了围绕耐克形象的社交媒体言论,重点关注种族意识,并得出结论认为,该品牌的 "觉醒 "企业社会责任举措并不具有变革性,它们只是在表现 "觉醒"。分析揭示了社交媒体数据中的三个共同主题:(1) BLM 的商品化,(2) 商品行动主义和 (3) 清醒的洗涤。通过研究耐克在时尚产业综合体中的 "觉醒 "企业社会责任实践的局限性,本研究为寻求满足具有社会意识的消费者不断变化的期望的品牌所面临的挑战和机遇提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A woke brand? An analysis of Nike and the limits of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the fashion-industrial complex
In an era marked by heightened social consciousness and impacted by Black Lives Matter (BLM), fashion brands worldwide endeavour to position themselves as socially responsible. This study scrutinizes Nike, a global leader in the fashion-industrial complex, and its ‘woke’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices. By conducting a detailed case study of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives and analysing social media user comments, the research seeks to unveil the tensions and constraints of ‘woke’ CSR. The study investigates the social media discourse surrounding Nike’s image, focusing on racial consciousness and concludes that the brand’s ‘woke’ CSR initiatives are not transformative; they merely perform wokeness. The analysis uncovered three common themes in the social media data: (1) the commodification of BLM, (2) commodity activism and (3) woke-washing. By examining the limits of Nike’s ‘woke’ CSR practices within the fashion-industrial complex, this study provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for brands seeking to meet socially conscious consumers’ evolving expectations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信