共同设计本科生物课程中的持久学习分析预测和支持工具

IF 6.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Robert D. Plumley, Matthew L. Bernacki, Jeffrey A. Greene, Shelbi Kuhlmann, Mladen Raković, Christopher J. Urban, Kelly A. Hogan, Chaewon Lee, Abigail T. Panter, Kathleen M. Gates
{"title":"共同设计本科生物课程中的持久学习分析预测和支持工具","authors":"Robert D. Plumley,&nbsp;Matthew L. Bernacki,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Greene,&nbsp;Shelbi Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Mladen Raković,&nbsp;Christopher J. Urban,&nbsp;Kelly A. Hogan,&nbsp;Chaewon Lee,&nbsp;Abigail T. Panter,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Gates","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Even highly motivated undergraduates drift off their STEM career pathways. In large introductory STEM classes, instructors struggle to identify and support these students. To address these issues, we developed co-redesign methods in partnership with disciplinary experts to create high-structure STEM courses that better support students and produce informative digital event data. To those data, we applied theory- and context-relevant labels to reflect active and self-regulated learning processes involving LMS-hosted course materials, formative assessments, and help-seeking tools. We illustrate the predictive benefits of this process across two cycles of model creation and reapplication. In cycle 1, we used theory-relevant features from 3 weeks of data to inform a prediction model that accurately identified struggling students and sustained its accuracy when reapplied in future semesters. In cycle 2, we refit a model with temporally contextualized features that achieved superior accuracy using data from just two class meetings. This modelling approach can produce durable learning analytics solutions that afford scaled and sustained prediction and intervention opportunities that involve explainable artificial intelligence products. Those same products that inform prediction can also guide intervention approaches and inform future instructional design and delivery.\n </p>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing enduring learning analytics prediction and support tools in undergraduate biology courses\",\"authors\":\"Robert D. Plumley,&nbsp;Matthew L. Bernacki,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Greene,&nbsp;Shelbi Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Mladen Raković,&nbsp;Christopher J. Urban,&nbsp;Kelly A. Hogan,&nbsp;Chaewon Lee,&nbsp;Abigail T. Panter,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Gates\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Even highly motivated undergraduates drift off their STEM career pathways. In large introductory STEM classes, instructors struggle to identify and support these students. To address these issues, we developed co-redesign methods in partnership with disciplinary experts to create high-structure STEM courses that better support students and produce informative digital event data. To those data, we applied theory- and context-relevant labels to reflect active and self-regulated learning processes involving LMS-hosted course materials, formative assessments, and help-seeking tools. We illustrate the predictive benefits of this process across two cycles of model creation and reapplication. In cycle 1, we used theory-relevant features from 3 weeks of data to inform a prediction model that accurately identified struggling students and sustained its accuracy when reapplied in future semesters. In cycle 2, we refit a model with temporally contextualized features that achieved superior accuracy using data from just two class meetings. This modelling approach can produce durable learning analytics solutions that afford scaled and sustained prediction and intervention opportunities that involve explainable artificial intelligence products. Those same products that inform prediction can also guide intervention approaches and inform future instructional design and delivery.\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13472\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使是积极性很高的本科生也会偏离他们的 STEM 职业道路。在大型 STEM 入门班中,教师很难识别和支持这些学生。为了解决这些问题,我们与学科专家合作开发了共同设计方法,以创建能更好地支持学生并产生翔实数字事件数据的高结构 STEM 课程。对于这些数据,我们应用了与理论和情境相关的标签,以反映主动和自我调节的学习过程,其中涉及 LMS 托管的课程材料、形成性评估和寻求帮助的工具。我们通过两个周期的模型创建和重新应用,说明了这一过程的预测优势。在周期 1 中,我们利用 3 周数据中与理论相关的特征,建立了一个预测模型,该模型能准确识别学习有困难的学生,并在未来学期重新应用时保持其准确性。在周期 2 中,我们利用时间背景特征重新设计了一个模型,该模型仅利用两次班会的数据就获得了极高的准确性。这种建模方法可以产生持久的学习分析解决方案,提供大规模、持续的预测和干预机会,其中涉及可解释的人工智能产品。基于人口统计数据的预测模型可能会延续系统性偏见。基于行为事件数据的预测模型可以准确预测学业成功,验证工作可以丰富这些数据,以反映学生在学习任务中的自我调节学习过程。学习分析可以成功地应用于在真实的中学后科学、技术、工程和数学环境中预测成绩,而使用情境和理论作为特征工程的指导,可以确保在再次应用时保持预测的准确性。这些设计还提供了观察和模拟以情境为基础的、与理论相一致的和时间定位的学习事件的机会,这些学习事件为预测模型提供了信息,而预测模型可以在初次应用和以后学期的再次应用中准确地对学生进行分类。研究人员和指导人员共同设计的关系对于开发特征工程的独特见解和产生可解释的人工智能预测建模方法至关重要,研究人员和指导人员共同设计的关系对于开发特征工程的独特见解和产生可解释的人工智能预测建模方法至关重要,研究人员和指导人员共同设计的关系对于开发特征工程的独特见解和产生可解释的人工智能预测建模方法至关重要。高结构课程设计可以为学生参与课程材料提供支架,从而提高学习效率,使特征工程的产品更具可解释性。当学习分析方法优先考虑反映学习过程的理论行为数据、对教学情境的敏感性以及开发可解释的成功预测指标,而不是依赖学生的人口统计特征作为预测指标时,学习分析计划可以避免系统性偏见的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing enduring learning analytics prediction and support tools in undergraduate biology courses

Even highly motivated undergraduates drift off their STEM career pathways. In large introductory STEM classes, instructors struggle to identify and support these students. To address these issues, we developed co-redesign methods in partnership with disciplinary experts to create high-structure STEM courses that better support students and produce informative digital event data. To those data, we applied theory- and context-relevant labels to reflect active and self-regulated learning processes involving LMS-hosted course materials, formative assessments, and help-seeking tools. We illustrate the predictive benefits of this process across two cycles of model creation and reapplication. In cycle 1, we used theory-relevant features from 3 weeks of data to inform a prediction model that accurately identified struggling students and sustained its accuracy when reapplied in future semesters. In cycle 2, we refit a model with temporally contextualized features that achieved superior accuracy using data from just two class meetings. This modelling approach can produce durable learning analytics solutions that afford scaled and sustained prediction and intervention opportunities that involve explainable artificial intelligence products. Those same products that inform prediction can also guide intervention approaches and inform future instructional design and delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信