Muhammad Kautzar Riski Saifulloh, Lego Karjoko, Hari Purwadi
{"title":"公证人在债务和应收款协议中签订出售委托书时的责任","authors":"Muhammad Kautzar Riski Saifulloh, Lego Karjoko, Hari Purwadi","doi":"10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the debt and receivable agreement, a Power of Sale is usually also created, which sometimes gives rise to legal problems. This research aims to analyze the validity of the notarial power of attorney deed used as collateral for debts and receivables, as well as examine the civil responsibility of the Notary for the power of attorney deed made before him. The research method is normative juridical, which is analyzed qualitatively with deductive logic. The type of data used is secondary data. The results of this research are: first, The sale of collateral objects by creditors themselves can be carried out as long as the provisions of Article 20 paragraph (2) UUHT are met. selling the object of collateral rights, this agreement between the creditor and the debtor is an agreement agreed upon after a default by the debtor. In the event that the power of attorney deed that has been prepared by the creditor is signed simultaneously at the time of signing the credit agreement between the creditor and the debtor, then the power of sale deed is contrary to Articles 6 and 20 UUHT, so that such power of sale deed does not legally have any legal standing. Second, the Notary's responsibility for the deed of power of sale in a debt and receivable agreement made before him can be borne by the Notary if the error comes from the Notary, for example in the case that the author examined where Notary SN, in making the deed of power of sale, committed an unlawful act because he directed the debtor to sign the deed. which is still blank without explaining the purpose of the deed. So then the debtor is disadvantaged by the existence of the power of attorney deed, because by using the power of attorney deed, the creditor secretly transfers the debtor's collateral to a third party at a very low price, even though the debtor is not in default. In this case Notary SN can be burdened with civil liability, namely Unlawful Actions Article 1365 of the Civil Code.","PeriodicalId":502776,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsibilities of a Notary in Making a Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell in a Debt and Receivable Agreement\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Kautzar Riski Saifulloh, Lego Karjoko, Hari Purwadi\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the debt and receivable agreement, a Power of Sale is usually also created, which sometimes gives rise to legal problems. This research aims to analyze the validity of the notarial power of attorney deed used as collateral for debts and receivables, as well as examine the civil responsibility of the Notary for the power of attorney deed made before him. The research method is normative juridical, which is analyzed qualitatively with deductive logic. The type of data used is secondary data. The results of this research are: first, The sale of collateral objects by creditors themselves can be carried out as long as the provisions of Article 20 paragraph (2) UUHT are met. selling the object of collateral rights, this agreement between the creditor and the debtor is an agreement agreed upon after a default by the debtor. In the event that the power of attorney deed that has been prepared by the creditor is signed simultaneously at the time of signing the credit agreement between the creditor and the debtor, then the power of sale deed is contrary to Articles 6 and 20 UUHT, so that such power of sale deed does not legally have any legal standing. Second, the Notary's responsibility for the deed of power of sale in a debt and receivable agreement made before him can be borne by the Notary if the error comes from the Notary, for example in the case that the author examined where Notary SN, in making the deed of power of sale, committed an unlawful act because he directed the debtor to sign the deed. which is still blank without explaining the purpose of the deed. So then the debtor is disadvantaged by the existence of the power of attorney deed, because by using the power of attorney deed, the creditor secretly transfers the debtor's collateral to a third party at a very low price, even though the debtor is not in default. In this case Notary SN can be burdened with civil liability, namely Unlawful Actions Article 1365 of the Civil Code.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在债务和应收账款协议中,通常还会订立一份销售委托书,这有时会引起法律问题。本研究旨在分析作为债务和应收账款抵押品的公证委托书的有效性,并研究公证人对其面前的委托书应承担的民事责任。研究方法为规范法学,采用演绎逻辑进行定性分析。使用的数据类型为二手数据。本研究的结果是:第一,只要符合《统一私法》第 20 条第(2)款的规定,就可以由债权人自行出售抵押标的物。出售抵押权标的物,债权人与债务人之间的这种协议是在债务人违约后达成的协议。如果债权人与债务人在签署信贷协议时同时签署了债权人准备的委托书,则该出售委托书违反了 UUHT 第 6 条和第 20 条的规定,因此该出售委托书在法律上不具有任何法律效力。其次,如果公证人出错,则公证人对在其面前签订的债务和应收款协议中的买卖契约的责任可由公证人承担,例如,在笔者审查的案例中,公证人 SN 在签订买卖契约时实施了违法行为,因为他指示债务人在契约上签字,而契约仍然是空白的,没有解释契约的目的。因此,债务人因委托书的存在而处于不利地位,因为债权人利用委托书将债务人的抵押品以极低的价格秘密转让给第三方,即使债务人没有违约。在这种情况下,公证人 SN 可能要承担民事责任,即《民法典》第 1365 条规定的非法行为。
Responsibilities of a Notary in Making a Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell in a Debt and Receivable Agreement
In the debt and receivable agreement, a Power of Sale is usually also created, which sometimes gives rise to legal problems. This research aims to analyze the validity of the notarial power of attorney deed used as collateral for debts and receivables, as well as examine the civil responsibility of the Notary for the power of attorney deed made before him. The research method is normative juridical, which is analyzed qualitatively with deductive logic. The type of data used is secondary data. The results of this research are: first, The sale of collateral objects by creditors themselves can be carried out as long as the provisions of Article 20 paragraph (2) UUHT are met. selling the object of collateral rights, this agreement between the creditor and the debtor is an agreement agreed upon after a default by the debtor. In the event that the power of attorney deed that has been prepared by the creditor is signed simultaneously at the time of signing the credit agreement between the creditor and the debtor, then the power of sale deed is contrary to Articles 6 and 20 UUHT, so that such power of sale deed does not legally have any legal standing. Second, the Notary's responsibility for the deed of power of sale in a debt and receivable agreement made before him can be borne by the Notary if the error comes from the Notary, for example in the case that the author examined where Notary SN, in making the deed of power of sale, committed an unlawful act because he directed the debtor to sign the deed. which is still blank without explaining the purpose of the deed. So then the debtor is disadvantaged by the existence of the power of attorney deed, because by using the power of attorney deed, the creditor secretly transfers the debtor's collateral to a third party at a very low price, even though the debtor is not in default. In this case Notary SN can be burdened with civil liability, namely Unlawful Actions Article 1365 of the Civil Code.