教师对大学机构管理熵的看法

Q3 Social Sciences
Francisco Javier Wong-Cabanillas, Josefina Amanda Suyo-Vega, Mónica Elisa Meneses-la-Riva, Ysabel Zevallos Parave, Fidel Tadeo Soria-Cuellar, Oscar Rafael Tinoco-Gómez
{"title":"教师对大学机构管理熵的看法","authors":"Francisco Javier Wong-Cabanillas, Josefina Amanda Suyo-Vega, Mónica Elisa Meneses-la-Riva, Ysabel Zevallos Parave, Fidel Tadeo Soria-Cuellar, Oscar Rafael Tinoco-Gómez","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University Entropy from the Teachers' Perspective Highlights Challenges in Terms of Structure, Communication, or Resource Management Efficiency. The study aims to determine teachers' perception of entropy in university institutional management. The methodology employed was quantitative, descriptive level, cross-sectional, and non-experimental in design. The population consisted of 300 teachers from various public universities in Lima who voluntarily participated. A key characteristic was that the universities had obtained institutional licensing. The entropy instrument has 2 dimensions: management and metamanagement, with 16 items using a dichotomous scale. It was validated by experts and subjected to a pilot test for reliability, obtaining a KR20 of 0.87. The study results revealed that entropy associated with the licensing process is perceived at high and medium levels, reflecting the persistence of fear, anxiety, uncertainty, and controversy regarding potential loss of autonomy. This autonomy is considered crucial in the university setting as it contributes to the development of critical thinking and professional formation of students. It is concluded that there is an urgent need to adopt a more holistic and reflective approach to address the challenges facing the education system in its constant pursuit of excellence and continuous improvement. This implies avoiding the influence of political control and management in the academic sphere, thus allowing for a more conducive environment for the overall growth and development of higher education. \n  \nReceived: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":"270 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Perception of Teachers Regarding Entropy in University Institutional Management\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Javier Wong-Cabanillas, Josefina Amanda Suyo-Vega, Mónica Elisa Meneses-la-Riva, Ysabel Zevallos Parave, Fidel Tadeo Soria-Cuellar, Oscar Rafael Tinoco-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.36941/jesr-2024-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"University Entropy from the Teachers' Perspective Highlights Challenges in Terms of Structure, Communication, or Resource Management Efficiency. The study aims to determine teachers' perception of entropy in university institutional management. The methodology employed was quantitative, descriptive level, cross-sectional, and non-experimental in design. The population consisted of 300 teachers from various public universities in Lima who voluntarily participated. A key characteristic was that the universities had obtained institutional licensing. The entropy instrument has 2 dimensions: management and metamanagement, with 16 items using a dichotomous scale. It was validated by experts and subjected to a pilot test for reliability, obtaining a KR20 of 0.87. The study results revealed that entropy associated with the licensing process is perceived at high and medium levels, reflecting the persistence of fear, anxiety, uncertainty, and controversy regarding potential loss of autonomy. This autonomy is considered crucial in the university setting as it contributes to the development of critical thinking and professional formation of students. It is concluded that there is an urgent need to adopt a more holistic and reflective approach to address the challenges facing the education system in its constant pursuit of excellence and continuous improvement. This implies avoiding the influence of political control and management in the academic sphere, thus allowing for a more conducive environment for the overall growth and development of higher education. \\n  \\nReceived: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024\",\"PeriodicalId\":15617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational and Social Research\",\"volume\":\"270 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational and Social Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师眼中的大学熵凸显了结构、沟通或资源管理效率方面的挑战。本研究旨在确定教师对大学机构管理中熵的看法。所采用的方法是定量、描述性、横断面和非实验设计。研究对象包括来自利马各公立大学的 300 名自愿参与的教师。这些大学的一个主要特点是获得了机构许可证。熵值工具包括两个维度:管理和元管理,共有 16 个项目,采用二分法量表。该工具经过专家验证,并进行了可靠性试点测试,KR20 为 0.87。研究结果表明,与许可证发放过程相关的熵值处于中高水平,反映了对可能丧失自主权的持续恐惧、焦虑、不确定性和争议。在大学环境中,这种自主性被认为是至关重要的,因为它有助于培养学生的批判性思维和专业素养。结论是,教育系统在不断追求卓越和持续改进的过程中,迫切需要采取一种更加全面和反思性的方法来应对所面临的挑战。这意味着要避免政治控制和管理对学术领域的影响,从而为高等教育的整体成长和发展创造更有利的环境。 收稿日期接收日期:2024 年 1 月 12 日 / 接受日期:2024 年 4 月 23 日 / 发表日期:2024 年 5 月 5 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Perception of Teachers Regarding Entropy in University Institutional Management
University Entropy from the Teachers' Perspective Highlights Challenges in Terms of Structure, Communication, or Resource Management Efficiency. The study aims to determine teachers' perception of entropy in university institutional management. The methodology employed was quantitative, descriptive level, cross-sectional, and non-experimental in design. The population consisted of 300 teachers from various public universities in Lima who voluntarily participated. A key characteristic was that the universities had obtained institutional licensing. The entropy instrument has 2 dimensions: management and metamanagement, with 16 items using a dichotomous scale. It was validated by experts and subjected to a pilot test for reliability, obtaining a KR20 of 0.87. The study results revealed that entropy associated with the licensing process is perceived at high and medium levels, reflecting the persistence of fear, anxiety, uncertainty, and controversy regarding potential loss of autonomy. This autonomy is considered crucial in the university setting as it contributes to the development of critical thinking and professional formation of students. It is concluded that there is an urgent need to adopt a more holistic and reflective approach to address the challenges facing the education system in its constant pursuit of excellence and continuous improvement. This implies avoiding the influence of political control and management in the academic sphere, thus allowing for a more conducive environment for the overall growth and development of higher education.   Received: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书