儿童在推理规则变化时会考虑 "谁 "和 "什么":两种文化儿童的比较研究

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Rui Guo, Dandan Li, Xin Zhao
{"title":"儿童在推理规则变化时会考虑 \"谁 \"和 \"什么\":两种文化儿童的比较研究","authors":"Rui Guo, Dandan Li, Xin Zhao","doi":"10.1177/01650254241246238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children’s normative knowledge develops early. While prior studies focus on rule compliance and violation, only limited research explores children’s views on rule changes, especially in non-Western cultures. This study investigates how Chinese children aged 4–7 ( N = 154) reason about rule changes, and compares their responses with US counterparts in the work of Zhao and Kushnir. Chinese children considered both “who” created the rules and “what” consequences the rule changes may bring about when judging changeability. For game rules, like US children, Chinese children considered both individual authority (including adult and peer authority) and collective agreement when judging who can change game rules. Compared to US children, Chinese children more often believe that the adult rule-maker’s child could also change the rule. Furthermore, although both Chinese and US children thought one could not change moral rules, Chinese children were less likely than US children to think one could change conventional rules. Exploratory analyses of children’s justifications suggest that Chinese children emphasize consequences more than US children when judging whether rules can be changed. This study offers valuable insights into the development of normative reasoning and cultural influences on children’s views on rule malleability.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children consider “who” and “what” when reasoning about rule changes: A comparative study of children from two cultures\",\"authors\":\"Rui Guo, Dandan Li, Xin Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01650254241246238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Children’s normative knowledge develops early. While prior studies focus on rule compliance and violation, only limited research explores children’s views on rule changes, especially in non-Western cultures. This study investigates how Chinese children aged 4–7 ( N = 154) reason about rule changes, and compares their responses with US counterparts in the work of Zhao and Kushnir. Chinese children considered both “who” created the rules and “what” consequences the rule changes may bring about when judging changeability. For game rules, like US children, Chinese children considered both individual authority (including adult and peer authority) and collective agreement when judging who can change game rules. Compared to US children, Chinese children more often believe that the adult rule-maker’s child could also change the rule. Furthermore, although both Chinese and US children thought one could not change moral rules, Chinese children were less likely than US children to think one could change conventional rules. Exploratory analyses of children’s justifications suggest that Chinese children emphasize consequences more than US children when judging whether rules can be changed. This study offers valuable insights into the development of normative reasoning and cultural influences on children’s views on rule malleability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254241246238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254241246238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童的规范性知识发展较早。以往的研究主要关注遵守规则和违反规则的情况,但对儿童对规则变化的看法,尤其是对非西方文化中儿童的看法的研究却十分有限。本研究调查了 4-7 岁的中国儿童(154 人)是如何推理规则变化的,并将他们的反应与美国儿童的反应进行了比较。中国儿童在判断规则的可变更性时,既考虑了 "谁 "制定了规则,也考虑了规则变更可能带来的 "什么 "后果。就游戏规则而言,与美国儿童一样,中国儿童在判断谁可以更改游戏规则时,既考虑了个人权威(包括成人权威和同伴权威),也考虑了集体协议。与美国儿童相比,中国儿童更倾向于认为成人规则制定者的孩子也可以改变规则。此外,尽管中国儿童和美国儿童都认为一个人不能改变道德规则,但中国儿童比美国儿童更不可能认为一个人可以改变常规规则。对儿童理由的探索性分析表明,在判断规则是否可以改变时,中国儿童比美国儿童更强调后果。本研究为规范推理的发展以及儿童对规则可塑性看法的文化影响提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children consider “who” and “what” when reasoning about rule changes: A comparative study of children from two cultures
Children’s normative knowledge develops early. While prior studies focus on rule compliance and violation, only limited research explores children’s views on rule changes, especially in non-Western cultures. This study investigates how Chinese children aged 4–7 ( N = 154) reason about rule changes, and compares their responses with US counterparts in the work of Zhao and Kushnir. Chinese children considered both “who” created the rules and “what” consequences the rule changes may bring about when judging changeability. For game rules, like US children, Chinese children considered both individual authority (including adult and peer authority) and collective agreement when judging who can change game rules. Compared to US children, Chinese children more often believe that the adult rule-maker’s child could also change the rule. Furthermore, although both Chinese and US children thought one could not change moral rules, Chinese children were less likely than US children to think one could change conventional rules. Exploratory analyses of children’s justifications suggest that Chinese children emphasize consequences more than US children when judging whether rules can be changed. This study offers valuable insights into the development of normative reasoning and cultural influences on children’s views on rule malleability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信