语言史的局限性

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Ewa Woźniak
{"title":"语言史的局限性","authors":"Ewa Woźniak","doi":"10.12797/lv.19.2024.37.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BOUNDARIES OF THE HISTORY OF LANGUAGE \nThe author of the article presents arguments for the redefinition of the subject of study of the history of the Polish language. Theoretical assumptions of this subdiscipline of diachronic linguistics were formulated more than a century ago by Zenon Klemensiewicz, the author of the, so far, only historical-linguistic synthesis. Since then, along with changing research paradigms, the boundaries of the subdiscipline’s field of study have been expanded to include stylistic, semantic, generic, textual, and discursive issues. The author argues that the growth of knowledge, resulting from the use of diverse methods, tools, and operational terms to describe the language of the past, should lead to the emancipation of such subdisciplines as historical stylistics, historical genre studies, and historical discourse studies. In turn, the history of language, rooted in the idea that it is the community that forms a language, would then focus exclusively on those changes in a language that have been causally related to the history of the community that uses it. Within such narrow boundaries of the research field, a new synthesis of the history of the Polish language could be created.","PeriodicalId":52400,"journal":{"name":"LingVaria","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Granice historii języka\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Woźniak\",\"doi\":\"10.12797/lv.19.2024.37.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BOUNDARIES OF THE HISTORY OF LANGUAGE \\nThe author of the article presents arguments for the redefinition of the subject of study of the history of the Polish language. Theoretical assumptions of this subdiscipline of diachronic linguistics were formulated more than a century ago by Zenon Klemensiewicz, the author of the, so far, only historical-linguistic synthesis. Since then, along with changing research paradigms, the boundaries of the subdiscipline’s field of study have been expanded to include stylistic, semantic, generic, textual, and discursive issues. The author argues that the growth of knowledge, resulting from the use of diverse methods, tools, and operational terms to describe the language of the past, should lead to the emancipation of such subdisciplines as historical stylistics, historical genre studies, and historical discourse studies. In turn, the history of language, rooted in the idea that it is the community that forms a language, would then focus exclusively on those changes in a language that have been causally related to the history of the community that uses it. Within such narrow boundaries of the research field, a new synthesis of the history of the Polish language could be created.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LingVaria\",\"volume\":\"44 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LingVaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12797/lv.19.2024.37.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LingVaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/lv.19.2024.37.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言史的界限 本文作者提出了重新定义波兰语言史研究课题的论点。一个多世纪前,迄今为止唯一一部历史语言学综合著作的作者 Zenon Klemensiewicz 提出了非同步语言学这一分支学科的理论假设。从那时起,随着研究范式的不断变化,该分支学科的研究领域也不断扩大,包括文体、语义、通用、文本和话语问题。作者认为,通过使用不同的方法、工具和操作术语来描述过去的语言,知识的增长应导致历史文体学、历史体裁研究和历史话语研究等分支学科的解放。反过来,根植于 "语言是由群体形成的 "这一理念的语言史,将只关注那些与使用语言的群体的历史有因果关系的语言变化。在研究领域如此狭窄的范围内,波兰语言史的新综合就有可能产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Granice historii języka
BOUNDARIES OF THE HISTORY OF LANGUAGE The author of the article presents arguments for the redefinition of the subject of study of the history of the Polish language. Theoretical assumptions of this subdiscipline of diachronic linguistics were formulated more than a century ago by Zenon Klemensiewicz, the author of the, so far, only historical-linguistic synthesis. Since then, along with changing research paradigms, the boundaries of the subdiscipline’s field of study have been expanded to include stylistic, semantic, generic, textual, and discursive issues. The author argues that the growth of knowledge, resulting from the use of diverse methods, tools, and operational terms to describe the language of the past, should lead to the emancipation of such subdisciplines as historical stylistics, historical genre studies, and historical discourse studies. In turn, the history of language, rooted in the idea that it is the community that forms a language, would then focus exclusively on those changes in a language that have been causally related to the history of the community that uses it. Within such narrow boundaries of the research field, a new synthesis of the history of the Polish language could be created.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LingVaria
LingVaria Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信