Eugenio Bologna, Hilly Perlman, Idan Zeeman, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Avi Beri, Roy Mano, Ofer Yossepowitch, Snir Dekalo, Yuval Bar-Yosef, Ziv Savin
{"title":"评估机器人前列腺癌根治术后盆腔引流管治疗漏尿的价值","authors":"Eugenio Bologna, Hilly Perlman, Idan Zeeman, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Avi Beri, Roy Mano, Ofer Yossepowitch, Snir Dekalo, Yuval Bar-Yosef, Ziv Savin","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The value of post-operative pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for the purpose of diagnosing post-operative complications is undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of pelvic drain outputs in predicting post-operative early-onset urinary leaks from a vesicourethral anastomosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent RARP in our institution between 2018 and 2022. The daily outputs of the drain and the urinary catheter were measured, and patients with early-onset anastomotic urinary leak were compared with those who were free of any leak. The association between post-operative drain output and the presence of urinary leak was investigated by regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Post-operative early-onset leak was present in six patients (3.4%) whose baseline characteristics were not different from those of patients with no leak. The median pelvic drain output on post-operative day 1 (D-POD1) was 80 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 51–150 mL) and 122 mL (IQR 62–200 mL) on D-POD2. The median D-POD1 of patients with a leak was significantly higher than those without one (250 mL vs 80 mL, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). The threshold to predict an anastomotic urinary leak was 227 mL on D-POD1 (area under the curve 0.88; <i>P</i> < .001), and an association between D-POD1 >227 mL and the presence of urinary leak (odds ratio 35; <i>P</i> < .001) was found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pelvic drain output on POD1 can predict early-onset urinary leak. Given the relatively low rate of this complication via a robotic approach, however, we consider that, unless otherwise indicated, the routine placement of a pelvic drain may be safely avoided.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"28 3","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-1633.12693","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the value of a pelvic drain for urinary leak after robotic radical prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Eugenio Bologna, Hilly Perlman, Idan Zeeman, Tomer Bashi, Karin Lifshitz, Avi Beri, Roy Mano, Ofer Yossepowitch, Snir Dekalo, Yuval Bar-Yosef, Ziv Savin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-1633.12693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>The value of post-operative pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for the purpose of diagnosing post-operative complications is undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of pelvic drain outputs in predicting post-operative early-onset urinary leaks from a vesicourethral anastomosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent RARP in our institution between 2018 and 2022. The daily outputs of the drain and the urinary catheter were measured, and patients with early-onset anastomotic urinary leak were compared with those who were free of any leak. The association between post-operative drain output and the presence of urinary leak was investigated by regression analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Post-operative early-onset leak was present in six patients (3.4%) whose baseline characteristics were not different from those of patients with no leak. The median pelvic drain output on post-operative day 1 (D-POD1) was 80 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 51–150 mL) and 122 mL (IQR 62–200 mL) on D-POD2. The median D-POD1 of patients with a leak was significantly higher than those without one (250 mL vs 80 mL, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). The threshold to predict an anastomotic urinary leak was 227 mL on D-POD1 (area under the curve 0.88; <i>P</i> < .001), and an association between D-POD1 >227 mL and the presence of urinary leak (odds ratio 35; <i>P</i> < .001) was found.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pelvic drain output on POD1 can predict early-onset urinary leak. Given the relatively low rate of this complication via a robotic approach, however, we consider that, unless otherwise indicated, the routine placement of a pelvic drain may be safely avoided.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"159-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-1633.12693\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12693\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)术后放置盆腔引流管对诊断术后并发症的价值尚不确定。本研究旨在评估盆腔引流管输出量在预测膀胱尿道吻合术后早发尿漏方面的收益。我们对2018年至2022年间在本院接受RARP的204例连续患者进行了回顾性分析。我们测量了引流管和导尿管的每日输出量,并将早期发生吻合口漏尿的患者与无漏尿的患者进行了比较。有六名患者(3.4%)术后出现了早发性漏尿,他们的基线特征与无漏尿患者无异。术后第1天(D-POD1)盆腔引流管排出量的中位数为80毫升(四分位距[IQR] 51-150毫升),D-POD2为122毫升(IQR 62-200毫升)。有漏尿症患者的 D-POD1 中位数明显高于无漏尿症患者(分别为 250 mL vs 80 mL;P 227 mL),并且发现存在漏尿症(几率比 35;P < .001)。然而,鉴于机器人手术的这种并发症发生率相对较低,我们认为除非另有说明,可以安全地避免常规放置盆腔引流管。
Assessing the value of a pelvic drain for urinary leak after robotic radical prostatectomy
Aim
The value of post-operative pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for the purpose of diagnosing post-operative complications is undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the yield of pelvic drain outputs in predicting post-operative early-onset urinary leaks from a vesicourethral anastomosis.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 204 consecutive patients who underwent RARP in our institution between 2018 and 2022. The daily outputs of the drain and the urinary catheter were measured, and patients with early-onset anastomotic urinary leak were compared with those who were free of any leak. The association between post-operative drain output and the presence of urinary leak was investigated by regression analyses.
Results
Post-operative early-onset leak was present in six patients (3.4%) whose baseline characteristics were not different from those of patients with no leak. The median pelvic drain output on post-operative day 1 (D-POD1) was 80 mL (interquartile range [IQR] 51–150 mL) and 122 mL (IQR 62–200 mL) on D-POD2. The median D-POD1 of patients with a leak was significantly higher than those without one (250 mL vs 80 mL, respectively; P < .001). The threshold to predict an anastomotic urinary leak was 227 mL on D-POD1 (area under the curve 0.88; P < .001), and an association between D-POD1 >227 mL and the presence of urinary leak (odds ratio 35; P < .001) was found.
Conclusions
Pelvic drain output on POD1 can predict early-onset urinary leak. Given the relatively low rate of this complication via a robotic approach, however, we consider that, unless otherwise indicated, the routine placement of a pelvic drain may be safely avoided.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.