探索感知学习风格偏好(PLSP)与外语课堂焦虑(FLCA)之间的关系

Berhanu Firissa, Alamirew Gebremariam
{"title":"探索感知学习风格偏好(PLSP)与外语课堂焦虑(FLCA)之间的关系","authors":"Berhanu Firissa, Alamirew Gebremariam","doi":"10.33474/j-reall.v5i1.21443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigating a relationship between perceptual learning style preferences (PLSP) and foreign language class anxiety (FLCA) remains limited, particularly regarding specific learning styles most impacted by FLCA and interventions to be tailored to reduce English class anxiety. The study examined the relationship between PLSP and FLCA among 110 grade eleven Mettu Comprehensive High School students. The study employed a PLSP questionnaire (Pashler et al., 2009) and an FLCA questionnaire (Horwitz et al., 1986) as the instruments. Data were collected, statistically analyzed, and interpreted using SPSS version 26. The study’s findings revealed that most participants' FLCA fell to the average higher level while those with group (PLSA-G) PLSP exhibited the least FLCA compared to participants with the individual (PLS-I) with the highest FLCA among the six dimensions of PLSP. Communication anxiety (FLCA-CA) significantly and fear of negative evaluation (FLCA-FNE) broadly were found to be the major sources of the participants’ sources of FLCA among its three dimensions in the scale. Furthermore, results of One-way ANOVA confirmed that PLSP is significantly and moderately related to FLCA. It was inferred that the constructs PLSP and FLCA play significant roles in the context of EFL teaching. Therefore, EFL instruction needs to address these variables as determinants of the learners’ success, and if meaningful pedagogical room is to be allocated, teaching practices need to pay attention to such.   This area of exploration can lead to significant advancements in EFL pedagogy, creating a more inclusive and successful learning experience for students.","PeriodicalId":416006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)","volume":"358 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between perceptual learning style preferences (PLSP) and foreign language class anxiety (FLCA)\",\"authors\":\"Berhanu Firissa, Alamirew Gebremariam\",\"doi\":\"10.33474/j-reall.v5i1.21443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigating a relationship between perceptual learning style preferences (PLSP) and foreign language class anxiety (FLCA) remains limited, particularly regarding specific learning styles most impacted by FLCA and interventions to be tailored to reduce English class anxiety. The study examined the relationship between PLSP and FLCA among 110 grade eleven Mettu Comprehensive High School students. The study employed a PLSP questionnaire (Pashler et al., 2009) and an FLCA questionnaire (Horwitz et al., 1986) as the instruments. Data were collected, statistically analyzed, and interpreted using SPSS version 26. The study’s findings revealed that most participants' FLCA fell to the average higher level while those with group (PLSA-G) PLSP exhibited the least FLCA compared to participants with the individual (PLS-I) with the highest FLCA among the six dimensions of PLSP. Communication anxiety (FLCA-CA) significantly and fear of negative evaluation (FLCA-FNE) broadly were found to be the major sources of the participants’ sources of FLCA among its three dimensions in the scale. Furthermore, results of One-way ANOVA confirmed that PLSP is significantly and moderately related to FLCA. It was inferred that the constructs PLSP and FLCA play significant roles in the context of EFL teaching. Therefore, EFL instruction needs to address these variables as determinants of the learners’ success, and if meaningful pedagogical room is to be allocated, teaching practices need to pay attention to such.   This area of exploration can lead to significant advancements in EFL pedagogy, creating a more inclusive and successful learning experience for students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)\",\"volume\":\"358 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v5i1.21443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v5i1.21443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对感知学习风格偏好(PLSP)和外语课焦虑(FLCA)之间关系的研究仍然有限,特别是关于受 FLCA 影响最大的特定学习风格和为减少英语课堂焦虑而量身定制的干预措施的研究。本研究调查了梅图综合高中十一年级 110 名学生的 PLSP 与 FLCA 之间的关系。研究采用了 PLSP 问卷(Pashler 等人,2009 年)和 FLCA 问卷(Horwitz 等人,1986 年)作为工具。数据收集、统计分析和解释均使用 SPSS 26 版本。研究结果表明,在 PLSP 的六个维度中,大多数参与者的 FLCA 处于平均较高水平,而与 FLCA 最高的个人 PLSP(PLS-I)参与者相比,团体 PLSP(PLSA-G)参与者的 FLCA 最低。在量表的三个维度中,沟通焦虑(FLCA-CA)和对负面评价的恐惧(FLCA-FNE)被认为是参与者FLCA的主要来源。此外,单因素方差分析的结果证实,PLSP 与 FLCA 呈中度显著相关。由此推断,PLSP 和 FLCA 在 EFL 教学中发挥着重要作用。因此,EFL 教学需要将这些变量作为学习者成功的决定因素,如果要分配有意义的教学空间,教学实践就需要关注这些变量。 这一领域的探索可使 EFL 教学法取得重大进展,为学生创造更加包容和成功的学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the relationship between perceptual learning style preferences (PLSP) and foreign language class anxiety (FLCA)
The study investigating a relationship between perceptual learning style preferences (PLSP) and foreign language class anxiety (FLCA) remains limited, particularly regarding specific learning styles most impacted by FLCA and interventions to be tailored to reduce English class anxiety. The study examined the relationship between PLSP and FLCA among 110 grade eleven Mettu Comprehensive High School students. The study employed a PLSP questionnaire (Pashler et al., 2009) and an FLCA questionnaire (Horwitz et al., 1986) as the instruments. Data were collected, statistically analyzed, and interpreted using SPSS version 26. The study’s findings revealed that most participants' FLCA fell to the average higher level while those with group (PLSA-G) PLSP exhibited the least FLCA compared to participants with the individual (PLS-I) with the highest FLCA among the six dimensions of PLSP. Communication anxiety (FLCA-CA) significantly and fear of negative evaluation (FLCA-FNE) broadly were found to be the major sources of the participants’ sources of FLCA among its three dimensions in the scale. Furthermore, results of One-way ANOVA confirmed that PLSP is significantly and moderately related to FLCA. It was inferred that the constructs PLSP and FLCA play significant roles in the context of EFL teaching. Therefore, EFL instruction needs to address these variables as determinants of the learners’ success, and if meaningful pedagogical room is to be allocated, teaching practices need to pay attention to such.   This area of exploration can lead to significant advancements in EFL pedagogy, creating a more inclusive and successful learning experience for students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信