Tristen Peyser, Laura M. Perry, Brenna Mossman, Kenneth Xu, Seowoo Kim, James B. Moran, Michael Hoerger
{"title":"癌症患者的个性和疾病管理自我效能感","authors":"Tristen Peyser, Laura M. Perry, Brenna Mossman, Kenneth Xu, Seowoo Kim, James B. Moran, Michael Hoerger","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Self-efficacy for illness management is increasingly recognized as important for outcomes in cancer. We examined whether The Big Five personality dimensions were associated with self-efficacy for illness management and hypothesized that patients who were less neurotic and more conscientious would have better self-efficacy. Methods Adults with cancer completed a cross-sectional survey that included the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and three subscales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions: managing emotions, managing symptoms, and managing treatment and medication. Linear regressions were used to test the hypotheses, while controlling for covariates. Results The personality and PROMIS self-efficacy measures demonstrated good evidence of reliability (median Cronbach’s alpha = .78, range of .69-.92) and validity (intercorrelations). As hypothesized, patients who were less neurotic or more conscientious had higher levels of illness self-efficacy overall and on each of the three subscales (all p s < .001). Openness was associated with better self-management of symptoms ( p = .013) and emotions ( p = .040). Extraversion was associated with better self-management of emotions ( p = .024). Conclusions Personality plays a vital role in illness self-efficacy for patients with cancer. Practice Implications: As a part of multidisciplinary care teams, psychosocial experts can use these findings to help patients better manage their illness.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":"39 2‐3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality and Self-efficacy for Illness Management in Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tristen Peyser, Laura M. Perry, Brenna Mossman, Kenneth Xu, Seowoo Kim, James B. Moran, Michael Hoerger\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Self-efficacy for illness management is increasingly recognized as important for outcomes in cancer. We examined whether The Big Five personality dimensions were associated with self-efficacy for illness management and hypothesized that patients who were less neurotic and more conscientious would have better self-efficacy. Methods Adults with cancer completed a cross-sectional survey that included the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and three subscales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions: managing emotions, managing symptoms, and managing treatment and medication. Linear regressions were used to test the hypotheses, while controlling for covariates. Results The personality and PROMIS self-efficacy measures demonstrated good evidence of reliability (median Cronbach’s alpha = .78, range of .69-.92) and validity (intercorrelations). As hypothesized, patients who were less neurotic or more conscientious had higher levels of illness self-efficacy overall and on each of the three subscales (all p s < .001). Openness was associated with better self-management of symptoms ( p = .013) and emotions ( p = .040). Extraversion was associated with better self-management of emotions ( p = .024). Conclusions Personality plays a vital role in illness self-efficacy for patients with cancer. Practice Implications: As a part of multidisciplinary care teams, psychosocial experts can use these findings to help patients better manage their illness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square\",\"volume\":\"39 2‐3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personality and Self-efficacy for Illness Management in Cancer
Abstract Objectives Self-efficacy for illness management is increasingly recognized as important for outcomes in cancer. We examined whether The Big Five personality dimensions were associated with self-efficacy for illness management and hypothesized that patients who were less neurotic and more conscientious would have better self-efficacy. Methods Adults with cancer completed a cross-sectional survey that included the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and three subscales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions: managing emotions, managing symptoms, and managing treatment and medication. Linear regressions were used to test the hypotheses, while controlling for covariates. Results The personality and PROMIS self-efficacy measures demonstrated good evidence of reliability (median Cronbach’s alpha = .78, range of .69-.92) and validity (intercorrelations). As hypothesized, patients who were less neurotic or more conscientious had higher levels of illness self-efficacy overall and on each of the three subscales (all p s < .001). Openness was associated with better self-management of symptoms ( p = .013) and emotions ( p = .040). Extraversion was associated with better self-management of emotions ( p = .024). Conclusions Personality plays a vital role in illness self-efficacy for patients with cancer. Practice Implications: As a part of multidisciplinary care teams, psychosocial experts can use these findings to help patients better manage their illness.