分析数字扫盲资料来源,确定人口收入、社会经济和主观幸福感之间的关系

Tanti Widia, . Nurdiani1, Muhammad Reza Aulia, Gede Wirabuana Putra, I. Kusnadi
{"title":"分析数字扫盲资料来源,确定人口收入、社会经济和主观幸福感之间的关系","authors":"Tanti Widia, . Nurdiani1, Muhammad Reza Aulia, Gede Wirabuana Putra, I. Kusnadi","doi":"10.60083/jsisfotek.v6i2.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze income inequality and subjective welfare in a region. This study uses microdata from household surveys to calculate income inequality. We conducted this survey using an identical questionnaire with a sample of adults. The sample size is around 100. One of the main findings of this study is that regions that were traditionally considered to have greater inequality no longer have this attribute when compared to regional and global levels. This reflects a shift in the pattern of inequality in the region. A positive correlation was also found between income inequality and subjective well-being, as well as a curve when comparing subjective well-being inequality with products. These results suggest that there is a complex relationship between these factors in the context of inequality. However, when compared with the level of subjective well-being, there is a very negative relationship, which may indicate an individual's preference to live in areas that are more egalitarian in terms of well-being. This indicates that subjective well-being perceptions are also influenced by factors other than income, such as access to facilities and services. Although these results are interesting, it is important to remember that this study has problems and limitations in terms of the survey and methods used. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution and can serve as a basis for further research to understand more deeply the relationship between income inequality, subjective well-being, and other factors that influence perceived well-being.","PeriodicalId":244194,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Digital Literacy Sources to Identify The Relationship Between Population Income, Socio-Economic and Subjective Well-Being\",\"authors\":\"Tanti Widia, . Nurdiani1, Muhammad Reza Aulia, Gede Wirabuana Putra, I. Kusnadi\",\"doi\":\"10.60083/jsisfotek.v6i2.350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to analyze income inequality and subjective welfare in a region. This study uses microdata from household surveys to calculate income inequality. We conducted this survey using an identical questionnaire with a sample of adults. The sample size is around 100. One of the main findings of this study is that regions that were traditionally considered to have greater inequality no longer have this attribute when compared to regional and global levels. This reflects a shift in the pattern of inequality in the region. A positive correlation was also found between income inequality and subjective well-being, as well as a curve when comparing subjective well-being inequality with products. These results suggest that there is a complex relationship between these factors in the context of inequality. However, when compared with the level of subjective well-being, there is a very negative relationship, which may indicate an individual's preference to live in areas that are more egalitarian in terms of well-being. This indicates that subjective well-being perceptions are also influenced by factors other than income, such as access to facilities and services. Although these results are interesting, it is important to remember that this study has problems and limitations in terms of the survey and methods used. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution and can serve as a basis for further research to understand more deeply the relationship between income inequality, subjective well-being, and other factors that influence perceived well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi\",\"volume\":\" 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60083/jsisfotek.v6i2.350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60083/jsisfotek.v6i2.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析一个地区的收入不平等和主观福利。本研究使用家庭调查的微观数据来计算收入不平等。我们使用相同的问卷对成人样本进行了调查。样本量约为 100 个。本研究的主要发现之一是,与地区和全球水平相比,传统上被认为不平等程度较高的地区不再具有这种属性。这反映了该地区不平等模式的转变。研究还发现,收入不平等与主观幸福感之间存在正相关,主观幸福感不平等与产品不平等之间也存在曲线关系。这些结果表明,在不平等的背景下,这些因素之间存在着复杂的关系。然而,当与主观幸福感水平相比较时,却出现了非常负面的关系,这可能表明个人更愿意生活在幸福感更加平等的地区。这表明,主观幸福感还受到收入以外因素的影响,如设施和服务的获取。尽管这些结果很有意思,但必须记住,这项研究在调查和所用方法方面存在问题和局限性。因此,在解释这些结果时应谨慎,可将其作为进一步研究的基础,以便更深入地了解收入不平等、主观幸福感和其他影响幸福感的因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Digital Literacy Sources to Identify The Relationship Between Population Income, Socio-Economic and Subjective Well-Being
This research aims to analyze income inequality and subjective welfare in a region. This study uses microdata from household surveys to calculate income inequality. We conducted this survey using an identical questionnaire with a sample of adults. The sample size is around 100. One of the main findings of this study is that regions that were traditionally considered to have greater inequality no longer have this attribute when compared to regional and global levels. This reflects a shift in the pattern of inequality in the region. A positive correlation was also found between income inequality and subjective well-being, as well as a curve when comparing subjective well-being inequality with products. These results suggest that there is a complex relationship between these factors in the context of inequality. However, when compared with the level of subjective well-being, there is a very negative relationship, which may indicate an individual's preference to live in areas that are more egalitarian in terms of well-being. This indicates that subjective well-being perceptions are also influenced by factors other than income, such as access to facilities and services. Although these results are interesting, it is important to remember that this study has problems and limitations in terms of the survey and methods used. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution and can serve as a basis for further research to understand more deeply the relationship between income inequality, subjective well-being, and other factors that influence perceived well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信