Tapu-gogy:将亵渎性教学法限制在教育者无法触及的新神圣性中

V. Olsen-Reeder
{"title":"Tapu-gogy:将亵渎性教学法限制在教育者无法触及的新神圣性中","authors":"V. Olsen-Reeder","doi":"10.47989/kpdc437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is situated around a small exhibition installed in the classics museum of the author’s institution, called Tapu-gogy, in November and December 2022. This work explored what a classroom might be like if pedagogy was locked away from the educator, shelved behind a glass case—too tapu (sacred) for an educator to touch. Following the exhibition’s intent, this paper argues that teaching pedagogy itself - once the most profane element of teaching life for any educator—is now too sacred for the educator to touch. As a sacred object can be to a museum, teaching pedagogy is a hijacked item now resting in a glass cage, untouchable by the experts most adept at handling it—the educators who designed it.\n \nThe paper clings to Māori understandings of the ‘sacred,’ and as such, interpretations may differ slightly from those this readership may have seen before, if they have seen any at all. In Māori society, we define the sacred as that which is tapu. To aid the reader’s understanding of this particular interpretation of the sacred, the paper uses well-known discussions around neoliberalism, the pandemic, and digital teaching pedagogy to make its arguments. It further hovers around the most recent literature on these topics from 2022, as the pandemic weighs so heavily upon the topic in the paper.","PeriodicalId":413842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tapu-gogy: Confining profane pedagogy to a new sacredness beyond the educator’s reach\",\"authors\":\"V. Olsen-Reeder\",\"doi\":\"10.47989/kpdc437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is situated around a small exhibition installed in the classics museum of the author’s institution, called Tapu-gogy, in November and December 2022. This work explored what a classroom might be like if pedagogy was locked away from the educator, shelved behind a glass case—too tapu (sacred) for an educator to touch. Following the exhibition’s intent, this paper argues that teaching pedagogy itself - once the most profane element of teaching life for any educator—is now too sacred for the educator to touch. As a sacred object can be to a museum, teaching pedagogy is a hijacked item now resting in a glass cage, untouchable by the experts most adept at handling it—the educators who designed it.\\n \\nThe paper clings to Māori understandings of the ‘sacred,’ and as such, interpretations may differ slightly from those this readership may have seen before, if they have seen any at all. In Māori society, we define the sacred as that which is tapu. To aid the reader’s understanding of this particular interpretation of the sacred, the paper uses well-known discussions around neoliberalism, the pandemic, and digital teaching pedagogy to make its arguments. It further hovers around the most recent literature on these topics from 2022, as the pandemic weighs so heavily upon the topic in the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Praxis in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文围绕 2022 年 11 月和 12 月在作者所在机构的古典博物馆举办的一个名为 "Tapu-gogy "的小型展览展开。该作品探讨了如果教学法被锁在玻璃柜后面,教育者无法触及,那么课堂会是什么样子。按照展览的意图,本文认为教学法本身--曾经是任何教育工作者教学生活中最亵渎的元素--现在对教育工作者来说太神圣了,无法触及。对于博物馆来说,教学法是一件神圣的物品,而对于设计教学法的教育工作者来说,教学法则是一件被劫持的物品,现在被关在玻璃笼子里,最擅长处理它的专家也无法触碰。本文所依据的是毛利人对 "神圣 "的理解,因此,本文的解释可能与读者以前所见过的解释略有不同,如果读者以前见过的话。在毛利社会,我们把 "神圣 "定义为 "塔普"。为了帮助读者理解这种对神圣的特殊诠释,本文利用围绕新自由主义、大流行病和数字教学法等众所周知的讨论来提出论点。由于大流行病对本文主题的影响如此之大,本文进一步围绕 2022 年有关这些主题的最新文献展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tapu-gogy: Confining profane pedagogy to a new sacredness beyond the educator’s reach
This paper is situated around a small exhibition installed in the classics museum of the author’s institution, called Tapu-gogy, in November and December 2022. This work explored what a classroom might be like if pedagogy was locked away from the educator, shelved behind a glass case—too tapu (sacred) for an educator to touch. Following the exhibition’s intent, this paper argues that teaching pedagogy itself - once the most profane element of teaching life for any educator—is now too sacred for the educator to touch. As a sacred object can be to a museum, teaching pedagogy is a hijacked item now resting in a glass cage, untouchable by the experts most adept at handling it—the educators who designed it.   The paper clings to Māori understandings of the ‘sacred,’ and as such, interpretations may differ slightly from those this readership may have seen before, if they have seen any at all. In Māori society, we define the sacred as that which is tapu. To aid the reader’s understanding of this particular interpretation of the sacred, the paper uses well-known discussions around neoliberalism, the pandemic, and digital teaching pedagogy to make its arguments. It further hovers around the most recent literature on these topics from 2022, as the pandemic weighs so heavily upon the topic in the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信