多米尼加共和国 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员手部卫生坚持率的纵向变化

C. D. Schnorr, Kathryn W. Roberts, E.C. Payano, Paloma Martínez Guzmán, M. De St. Aubin, Matthew Lozier, Salomé Garnier, D. Dumas, Kelsey McDavid, C. T. Then Paulino, R. Skewes-Ramm, C. Craig, E. Zielinski Gutiérrez, William Duke, E. Nilles
{"title":"多米尼加共和国 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员手部卫生坚持率的纵向变化","authors":"C. D. Schnorr, Kathryn W. Roberts, E.C. Payano, Paloma Martínez Guzmán, M. De St. Aubin, Matthew Lozier, Salomé Garnier, D. Dumas, Kelsey McDavid, C. T. Then Paulino, R. Skewes-Ramm, C. Craig, E. Zielinski Gutiérrez, William Duke, E. Nilles","doi":"10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hand hygiene (HH) can reduce transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in healthcare facilities and is especially important in low- and middle-income countries where HH infrastructure may be insufficient and the burden of HAIs is highest. At baseline, we assessed HH infrastructure and practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) at two large hospitals in the Dominican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCWs were observed for HH adherence (HHA) (defined as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing with soap and water) before and after patient contact and donning new gloves before patient contact. The baseline assessment was repeated following implementation of local production and distribution of ABHR and a HH promotion campaign. Descriptive analyses and regression models evaluated predictors of HHA and glove use. Cumulative HHA was 18.9%. While patient-care areas with a functional HH resource increased from 47% at baseline to 92% after the intervention, HHA declined from 23.0% to 16.7%. HHA was higher after patient contact (aOR = 5.88; 95% CI = 4.17–8.33), during a period of increased COVID-19 risk (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.77), during invasive patient contacts (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.23–2.17) and when gloves were not used (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.56). The negative association between glove use and HHA diminished when access to HH resources increased. New gloves were donned before 39.6% of patient contacts. Glove use was higher among nurses (aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02–16.79) and during invasive contacts (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27–10.0). While access to HH resources increased after the interventions, HHA did not increase. HHA was lower when COVID-19 risk was lower. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to increase HHA among HCWs.","PeriodicalId":93672,"journal":{"name":"PLOS water","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal changes in hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican Republic\",\"authors\":\"C. D. Schnorr, Kathryn W. Roberts, E.C. Payano, Paloma Martínez Guzmán, M. De St. Aubin, Matthew Lozier, Salomé Garnier, D. Dumas, Kelsey McDavid, C. T. Then Paulino, R. Skewes-Ramm, C. Craig, E. Zielinski Gutiérrez, William Duke, E. Nilles\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hand hygiene (HH) can reduce transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in healthcare facilities and is especially important in low- and middle-income countries where HH infrastructure may be insufficient and the burden of HAIs is highest. At baseline, we assessed HH infrastructure and practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) at two large hospitals in the Dominican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCWs were observed for HH adherence (HHA) (defined as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing with soap and water) before and after patient contact and donning new gloves before patient contact. The baseline assessment was repeated following implementation of local production and distribution of ABHR and a HH promotion campaign. Descriptive analyses and regression models evaluated predictors of HHA and glove use. Cumulative HHA was 18.9%. While patient-care areas with a functional HH resource increased from 47% at baseline to 92% after the intervention, HHA declined from 23.0% to 16.7%. HHA was higher after patient contact (aOR = 5.88; 95% CI = 4.17–8.33), during a period of increased COVID-19 risk (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.77), during invasive patient contacts (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.23–2.17) and when gloves were not used (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.56). The negative association between glove use and HHA diminished when access to HH resources increased. New gloves were donned before 39.6% of patient contacts. Glove use was higher among nurses (aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02–16.79) and during invasive contacts (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27–10.0). While access to HH resources increased after the interventions, HHA did not increase. HHA was lower when COVID-19 risk was lower. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to increase HHA among HCWs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS water\",\"volume\":\" 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手部卫生 (HH) 可以减少医疗机构中的医源性感染 (HAI) 传播,这一点在中低收入国家尤为重要,因为这些国家的手部卫生基础设施可能不足,医源性感染的负担最重。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们对多米尼加共和国两家大型医院的卫生保健基础设施和医护人员(HCWs)的卫生保健实践进行了基线评估。我们观察了医护人员在接触患者前后是否遵守卫生设施(HHA)(定义为使用酒精擦手液(ABHR)或用肥皂和水洗手),以及在接触患者前是否佩戴新手套。在当地生产和分发 ABHR 并开展 HH 宣传活动后,再次进行基线评估。描述性分析和回归模型评估了 HHA 和手套使用的预测因素。累计 HHA 为 18.9%。在干预措施实施后,拥有功能性 HH 资源的病人护理区从基线时的 47% 增加到 92%,而 HHA 则从 23.0% 下降到 16.7%。患者接触后(aOR = 5.88;95% CI = 4.17-8.33)、COVID-19 风险增加期间(aOR = 1.69;95% CI = 1.05-2.77)、侵入性患者接触期间(aOR = 1.64;95% CI = 1.23-2.17)以及未使用手套时(aOR = 1.25;95% CI = 1.01-1.56),HHA 较高。当获得 HH 资源的机会增加时,手套使用与 HHA 之间的负相关关系就会减弱。39.6%的患者在接触前会戴上新手套。护士(aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02-16.79)和侵入性接触期间(aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27-10.0)的手套使用率更高。干预后,虽然获得 HH 资源的机会增加了,但 HHA 却没有增加。当 COVID-19 风险较低时,HHA 也较低。本研究的结果可为今后提高医护人员HHA的工作提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal changes in hand hygiene adherence among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, Dominican Republic
Hand hygiene (HH) can reduce transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in healthcare facilities and is especially important in low- and middle-income countries where HH infrastructure may be insufficient and the burden of HAIs is highest. At baseline, we assessed HH infrastructure and practices among healthcare workers (HCWs) at two large hospitals in the Dominican Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic. HCWs were observed for HH adherence (HHA) (defined as the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing with soap and water) before and after patient contact and donning new gloves before patient contact. The baseline assessment was repeated following implementation of local production and distribution of ABHR and a HH promotion campaign. Descriptive analyses and regression models evaluated predictors of HHA and glove use. Cumulative HHA was 18.9%. While patient-care areas with a functional HH resource increased from 47% at baseline to 92% after the intervention, HHA declined from 23.0% to 16.7%. HHA was higher after patient contact (aOR = 5.88; 95% CI = 4.17–8.33), during a period of increased COVID-19 risk (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.05–2.77), during invasive patient contacts (aOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.23–2.17) and when gloves were not used (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01–1.56). The negative association between glove use and HHA diminished when access to HH resources increased. New gloves were donned before 39.6% of patient contacts. Glove use was higher among nurses (aOR = 7.12; 95% CI = 3.02–16.79) and during invasive contacts (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI = 2.27–10.0). While access to HH resources increased after the interventions, HHA did not increase. HHA was lower when COVID-19 risk was lower. Findings from this study may guide future efforts to increase HHA among HCWs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信