帕金森病患者姿势控制机制的额外视觉信息:一项试点研究

Lucas H. C. C. Santos, Rafaela B. S. C. Garbus, Camila M. Aquino, Sandra M. S. F. Freitas
{"title":"帕金森病患者姿势控制机制的额外视觉信息:一项试点研究","authors":"Lucas H. C. C. Santos, Rafaela B. S. C. Garbus, Camila M. Aquino, Sandra M. S. F. Freitas","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) have sensorimotor deficits that affect the mechanisms of postural control. Additional visual information effects on postural control mechanisms in PD were unknown.\nAIM: To examine the effects of visual information on postural control mechanisms in individuals with PD.\nMETHOD: Seven individuals with PD and five healthy adults (controls) stood, as quiet as possible, on a force plate for 35 seconds with eyes open, eyes closed, or with additional visual feedback [VF] of the center of pressure (COP). The COP trajectories were calculated in anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions and then decomposed to assess two postural control mechanisms: Rambling (i.e., supraspinal) and Trembling (i.e., peripheral). The amplitude and velocity of COP and Rambling and Trembling components were compared between groups for each visual condition.\nRESULTS: The amplitude and velocity of COP and its components were greater in individuals with PD than controls. They increased under closed eyes condition for PD group, but only the Rambling velocity increased in anterior-posterior direction for controls. When additional VF of the COP was provided, individuals with PD presented increased COP and Trembling velocity in mediolateral direction, while healthy individuals presented reduced sway in both directions.\nCONCLUSION: Individuals with PD showed greater postural sway and were more affected without visual information than controls. They were not able to use the additional VF to reduce their postural sway as healthy individuals due to changes in sensory integration, causing possible overload in supraspinal processes and compensatory effects in the peripheral postural control mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"121 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional visual information on postural control mechanisms in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Lucas H. C. C. Santos, Rafaela B. S. C. Garbus, Camila M. Aquino, Sandra M. S. F. Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) have sensorimotor deficits that affect the mechanisms of postural control. Additional visual information effects on postural control mechanisms in PD were unknown.\\nAIM: To examine the effects of visual information on postural control mechanisms in individuals with PD.\\nMETHOD: Seven individuals with PD and five healthy adults (controls) stood, as quiet as possible, on a force plate for 35 seconds with eyes open, eyes closed, or with additional visual feedback [VF] of the center of pressure (COP). The COP trajectories were calculated in anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions and then decomposed to assess two postural control mechanisms: Rambling (i.e., supraspinal) and Trembling (i.e., peripheral). The amplitude and velocity of COP and Rambling and Trembling components were compared between groups for each visual condition.\\nRESULTS: The amplitude and velocity of COP and its components were greater in individuals with PD than controls. They increased under closed eyes condition for PD group, but only the Rambling velocity increased in anterior-posterior direction for controls. When additional VF of the COP was provided, individuals with PD presented increased COP and Trembling velocity in mediolateral direction, while healthy individuals presented reduced sway in both directions.\\nCONCLUSION: Individuals with PD showed greater postural sway and were more affected without visual information than controls. They were not able to use the additional VF to reduce their postural sway as healthy individuals due to changes in sensory integration, causing possible overload in supraspinal processes and compensatory effects in the peripheral postural control mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"volume\":\"121 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of motor behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:帕金森病(PD)患者的感官运动障碍会影响姿势控制机制。目的:研究视觉信息对帕金森病患者姿势控制机制的影响。方法:7 名帕金森病患者和 5 名健康成人(对照组)尽可能安静地站在受力板上 35 秒钟,睁眼、闭眼或附加压力中心(COP)视觉反馈 [VF]。计算前后和内外侧方向的 COP 轨迹,然后进行分解,以评估两种姿势控制机制:Rambling(即脊柱上部)和 Trembling(即外周)。结果:与对照组相比,脊髓灰质炎患者的 COP 及其分量的振幅和速度更大。在闭眼条件下,PD 组的 COP 及其分量都有所增加,但对照组只有 Rambling 速度在前后方向有所增加。结论:与对照组相比,脊髓灰质炎患者在没有视觉信息的情况下表现出更大的姿势摇摆,且受影响更大。结论:与对照组相比,帕金森氏症患者在没有视觉信息的情况下表现出更大的姿势摇摆,并且受到的影响更大。由于感觉统合发生了变化,他们无法像健康人那样利用额外的视觉信息来减少姿势摇摆,这可能会导致脊髓上过程超负荷以及外周姿势控制机制的补偿效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Additional visual information on postural control mechanisms in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) have sensorimotor deficits that affect the mechanisms of postural control. Additional visual information effects on postural control mechanisms in PD were unknown. AIM: To examine the effects of visual information on postural control mechanisms in individuals with PD. METHOD: Seven individuals with PD and five healthy adults (controls) stood, as quiet as possible, on a force plate for 35 seconds with eyes open, eyes closed, or with additional visual feedback [VF] of the center of pressure (COP). The COP trajectories were calculated in anterior-posterior and mediolateral directions and then decomposed to assess two postural control mechanisms: Rambling (i.e., supraspinal) and Trembling (i.e., peripheral). The amplitude and velocity of COP and Rambling and Trembling components were compared between groups for each visual condition. RESULTS: The amplitude and velocity of COP and its components were greater in individuals with PD than controls. They increased under closed eyes condition for PD group, but only the Rambling velocity increased in anterior-posterior direction for controls. When additional VF of the COP was provided, individuals with PD presented increased COP and Trembling velocity in mediolateral direction, while healthy individuals presented reduced sway in both directions. CONCLUSION: Individuals with PD showed greater postural sway and were more affected without visual information than controls. They were not able to use the additional VF to reduce their postural sway as healthy individuals due to changes in sensory integration, causing possible overload in supraspinal processes and compensatory effects in the peripheral postural control mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信