Rima Eka Putri, Agus Surono, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
{"title":"印度尼西亚对利用庞氏骗局进行非法投资欺诈的受害者的法律保护","authors":"Rima Eka Putri, Agus Surono, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar","doi":"10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted through the investigation and analysis of additional criminal reasons for rulgi can be applied as an ulpaya perlindungan victim of investment with a ponzi scheme. Also, reviewing and analyzing Hukum Perlindungan for Victims of Investigative Pellnipulan with Ponzi Skema. This research uses a Normative Juridical approach. While the penelitian that is carried out by pelnelliti is the case study (Casel Approach). The results of this study show two things, namely: 1) At present there are only a few regulations that more or less allude to the discussion of ponzi, including: Law No. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade, Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, Law No. 19 of 2016 Jo. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Criminal provisions against investment activities with ponzi / fraudulent schemes are regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and are very closely related to crime and the scope of criminal liability, 2) Compensation as one type of criminal sanction adopted in the new Criminal Code does not provide further explanation about the amount.","PeriodicalId":502776,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","volume":"101 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Protection for Victims of Illegal Investment Fraud Using the Ponzi Scheme in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Rima Eka Putri, Agus Surono, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar\",\"doi\":\"10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted through the investigation and analysis of additional criminal reasons for rulgi can be applied as an ulpaya perlindungan victim of investment with a ponzi scheme. Also, reviewing and analyzing Hukum Perlindungan for Victims of Investigative Pellnipulan with Ponzi Skema. This research uses a Normative Juridical approach. While the penelitian that is carried out by pelnelliti is the case study (Casel Approach). The results of this study show two things, namely: 1) At present there are only a few regulations that more or less allude to the discussion of ponzi, including: Law No. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade, Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, Law No. 19 of 2016 Jo. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Criminal provisions against investment activities with ponzi / fraudulent schemes are regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and are very closely related to crime and the scope of criminal liability, 2) Compensation as one type of criminal sanction adopted in the new Criminal Code does not provide further explanation about the amount.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research\",\"volume\":\"101 37\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legal Protection for Victims of Illegal Investment Fraud Using the Ponzi Scheme in Indonesia
This study was conducted through the investigation and analysis of additional criminal reasons for rulgi can be applied as an ulpaya perlindungan victim of investment with a ponzi scheme. Also, reviewing and analyzing Hukum Perlindungan for Victims of Investigative Pellnipulan with Ponzi Skema. This research uses a Normative Juridical approach. While the penelitian that is carried out by pelnelliti is the case study (Casel Approach). The results of this study show two things, namely: 1) At present there are only a few regulations that more or less allude to the discussion of ponzi, including: Law No. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade, Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, Law No. 19 of 2016 Jo. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Criminal provisions against investment activities with ponzi / fraudulent schemes are regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and are very closely related to crime and the scope of criminal liability, 2) Compensation as one type of criminal sanction adopted in the new Criminal Code does not provide further explanation about the amount.