正规教育中的学生评价:尼泊尔社区学校教师的观点

Mohan Singh Saud, Samjhana Aryal, Jib Lal Sapkota
{"title":"正规教育中的学生评价:尼泊尔社区学校教师的观点","authors":"Mohan Singh Saud, Samjhana Aryal, Jib Lal Sapkota","doi":"10.3126/paj.v7i1.65764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present secondary level English curriculum of Grade 9 and 10 in Nepal has made the provision of 25 marks internal assessment system as part of summative evaluation. In this context, this study examines the existing internal assessment practices adopted by the English language teachers in the Secondary Education Examination of the community schools in Nepal. Employing the qualitative phenomenological research design, five secondary level English language teachers were selected purposively as research participants. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used as tools for collecting data. The data were analyzed inductively as content analysis using the internal assessment criteria of participation, listening, speaking, and score from terminal examinations as determined by the curriculum as part of summative evaluation. The result was interpreted through the perspective of Vygotsky’s (1978) zone of proximal development and the theory of scaffolding in relation to the assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. The prominence of assessment of learning as the dominant practice has resulted in the marginalization of the other two purposes of assessment. The findings of the study highlight the need for a more balanced approach that encompasses assessment for learning and assessment as learning, ensuring a comprehensive and holistic evaluation of students’ progress and development.","PeriodicalId":497597,"journal":{"name":"Prithvi academic journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Assessment in Formal Education: Nepali Community School Teachers’ Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Mohan Singh Saud, Samjhana Aryal, Jib Lal Sapkota\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/paj.v7i1.65764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present secondary level English curriculum of Grade 9 and 10 in Nepal has made the provision of 25 marks internal assessment system as part of summative evaluation. In this context, this study examines the existing internal assessment practices adopted by the English language teachers in the Secondary Education Examination of the community schools in Nepal. Employing the qualitative phenomenological research design, five secondary level English language teachers were selected purposively as research participants. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used as tools for collecting data. The data were analyzed inductively as content analysis using the internal assessment criteria of participation, listening, speaking, and score from terminal examinations as determined by the curriculum as part of summative evaluation. The result was interpreted through the perspective of Vygotsky’s (1978) zone of proximal development and the theory of scaffolding in relation to the assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. The prominence of assessment of learning as the dominant practice has resulted in the marginalization of the other two purposes of assessment. The findings of the study highlight the need for a more balanced approach that encompasses assessment for learning and assessment as learning, ensuring a comprehensive and holistic evaluation of students’ progress and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prithvi academic journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prithvi academic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/paj.v7i1.65764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prithvi academic journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/paj.v7i1.65764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼泊尔现行的中学九年级和十年级英语课程规定了 25 分的内部评估制度,作为终结性评价的一部分。在此背景下,本研究探讨了尼泊尔社区学校英语教师在中学教育考试中采用的现行内部评估方法。本研究采用定性现象学研究设计,有目的地选择了五名中学英语教师作为研究对象。研究采用半结构式访谈和参与式观察作为收集数据的工具。作为终结性评价的一部分,采用课程确定的参与、听力、口语和终结性考试成绩等内部评估标准,对数据进行归纳式内容分析。研究结果通过维果茨基(1978 年)的 "最近发展区"(zone of proximal development)和 "脚手架"(scaffolding)理论,结合 "学习评价"、"作为学习的评价 "和 "学习评价 "进行解读。学习评价作为主流实践的突出地位导致了其他两个评价目的的边缘化。研究结果突出表明,有必要采取一种更加平衡的方法,将 "为学习而评 估 "和 "作为学习的评估 "结合起来,确保对学生的进步和发展进行全面综合的评 估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Assessment in Formal Education: Nepali Community School Teachers’ Perspectives
The present secondary level English curriculum of Grade 9 and 10 in Nepal has made the provision of 25 marks internal assessment system as part of summative evaluation. In this context, this study examines the existing internal assessment practices adopted by the English language teachers in the Secondary Education Examination of the community schools in Nepal. Employing the qualitative phenomenological research design, five secondary level English language teachers were selected purposively as research participants. Semi-structured interviews and participant observation were used as tools for collecting data. The data were analyzed inductively as content analysis using the internal assessment criteria of participation, listening, speaking, and score from terminal examinations as determined by the curriculum as part of summative evaluation. The result was interpreted through the perspective of Vygotsky’s (1978) zone of proximal development and the theory of scaffolding in relation to the assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. The prominence of assessment of learning as the dominant practice has resulted in the marginalization of the other two purposes of assessment. The findings of the study highlight the need for a more balanced approach that encompasses assessment for learning and assessment as learning, ensuring a comprehensive and holistic evaluation of students’ progress and development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信