欧盟成员国能否抵御新危机?

Ion Popa, Ana Alexandra Olariu, Andreea Breazu, Cristian-Bogdan Nica
{"title":"欧盟成员国能否抵御新危机?","authors":"Ion Popa, Ana Alexandra Olariu, Andreea Breazu, Cristian-Bogdan Nica","doi":"10.24818/imc/2023/02.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the contemporary landscape of global challenges and uncertainties, the significance of national resilience stands as a cornerstone for a country's ability to effectively respond to crises, maintain stability, and secure the well-being of its citizens. This study sought to assess the resilience levels of European Union (EU) countries in the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis, through the analysis of secondary data. The investigation incorporated the FM Global Resilience Index, comprising three key indicators—economic resilience, risk quality, and supply chain resilience. To achieve the research objectives, a Two-Step Cluster Analysis and One-Way ANOVA were conducted using the SPSS statistical software. The study outcomes delineated three clusters characterizing the resilience levels of European Union countries. Notably, Denmark emerged as the most resilient country, succeeded by Luxembourg and Germany. Romania, in this context, occupies the 22nd position in the ranking. The study's implications go beyond shaping post-Covid-19 resilience policies in European Union countries, and also provide valuable insights for the specialized literature on the subject. This dual impact underscores the study's significance in both practical policymaking and academic discourse","PeriodicalId":296892,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Management Conference","volume":"73 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARE EU MEMBER STATES RESILIENT TO NEW CRISES?\",\"authors\":\"Ion Popa, Ana Alexandra Olariu, Andreea Breazu, Cristian-Bogdan Nica\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/imc/2023/02.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the contemporary landscape of global challenges and uncertainties, the significance of national resilience stands as a cornerstone for a country's ability to effectively respond to crises, maintain stability, and secure the well-being of its citizens. This study sought to assess the resilience levels of European Union (EU) countries in the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis, through the analysis of secondary data. The investigation incorporated the FM Global Resilience Index, comprising three key indicators—economic resilience, risk quality, and supply chain resilience. To achieve the research objectives, a Two-Step Cluster Analysis and One-Way ANOVA were conducted using the SPSS statistical software. The study outcomes delineated three clusters characterizing the resilience levels of European Union countries. Notably, Denmark emerged as the most resilient country, succeeded by Luxembourg and Germany. Romania, in this context, occupies the 22nd position in the ranking. The study's implications go beyond shaping post-Covid-19 resilience policies in European Union countries, and also provide valuable insights for the specialized literature on the subject. This dual impact underscores the study's significance in both practical policymaking and academic discourse\",\"PeriodicalId\":296892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"73 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/imc/2023/02.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/imc/2023/02.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球挑战和不确定性的当代环境中,国家复原力的重要性是一个国家有效应对危机、维护稳定和保障公民福祉能力的基石。本研究试图通过对二手数据的分析,评估欧盟(EU)国家在 Covid-19 危机后的复原力水平。调查采用了 FM 全球复原力指数,包括三个关键指标--经济复原力、风险质量和供应链复原力。为实现研究目标,使用 SPSS 统计软件进行了两步聚类分析和单向方差分析。研究结果划分出三个聚类,描述了欧盟国家的复原力水平。值得注意的是,丹麦成为复原力最强的国家,卢森堡和德国紧随其后。在这方面,罗马尼亚排名第 22 位。这项研究的意义不仅在于为欧盟国家制定 "科维德-19 "事件后的抗灾政策,还为有关这一主题的专业文献提供了宝贵的见解。这种双重影响凸显了该研究在实际决策和学术讨论中的重要意义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ARE EU MEMBER STATES RESILIENT TO NEW CRISES?
In the contemporary landscape of global challenges and uncertainties, the significance of national resilience stands as a cornerstone for a country's ability to effectively respond to crises, maintain stability, and secure the well-being of its citizens. This study sought to assess the resilience levels of European Union (EU) countries in the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis, through the analysis of secondary data. The investigation incorporated the FM Global Resilience Index, comprising three key indicators—economic resilience, risk quality, and supply chain resilience. To achieve the research objectives, a Two-Step Cluster Analysis and One-Way ANOVA were conducted using the SPSS statistical software. The study outcomes delineated three clusters characterizing the resilience levels of European Union countries. Notably, Denmark emerged as the most resilient country, succeeded by Luxembourg and Germany. Romania, in this context, occupies the 22nd position in the ranking. The study's implications go beyond shaping post-Covid-19 resilience policies in European Union countries, and also provide valuable insights for the specialized literature on the subject. This dual impact underscores the study's significance in both practical policymaking and academic discourse
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信