人工智能对媒体从业人员的影响:公司如何使用一系列法律补救措施

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
J. Díaz-Noci, Simón Peña-Fernández, Koldobica Meso-Ayerdi, A. Larrondo-Ureta
{"title":"人工智能对媒体从业人员的影响:公司如何使用一系列法律补救措施","authors":"J. Díaz-Noci, Simón Peña-Fernández, Koldobica Meso-Ayerdi, A. Larrondo-Ureta","doi":"10.51698/tripodos.2024.55.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of ChatGPT and other related artificial intelligence systems has posed many questions upon the impact that such tools could have on some jobs, including media workers. Serious legal concerns have arisen regarding the learning practices of AI-related companies such as OpenAI and Google. These concerns involve crawling and extracting presumably unauthorized copyright works from news repositories, whose rightholders are often media companies. In this article, we aim to categorize the newsroom practices and routines affected by artificial intelligence. We also explore copyright-law related issues, including AI-assisted reporting, its impact on journalists and the media workforce, SEO and commercial strategies, as well as training and blocking AI engines. The legal solutions applied to solve those questions are also addressed, including technical solutions, fair use guidelines and legal solutions (litigation, legislative reform, and negotiation). Our conclusion is twofold: first, in the unequal fight against artificial intelligence systems, a utilitarian and entrepreneurial conception of intellectual property is enforced; and second, the position of journalists as authors is weakening.\n ","PeriodicalId":44263,"journal":{"name":"Tripodos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of AI in the Media Work Force: How Companies Use an Array of Legal Remedies\",\"authors\":\"J. Díaz-Noci, Simón Peña-Fernández, Koldobica Meso-Ayerdi, A. Larrondo-Ureta\",\"doi\":\"10.51698/tripodos.2024.55.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of ChatGPT and other related artificial intelligence systems has posed many questions upon the impact that such tools could have on some jobs, including media workers. Serious legal concerns have arisen regarding the learning practices of AI-related companies such as OpenAI and Google. These concerns involve crawling and extracting presumably unauthorized copyright works from news repositories, whose rightholders are often media companies. In this article, we aim to categorize the newsroom practices and routines affected by artificial intelligence. We also explore copyright-law related issues, including AI-assisted reporting, its impact on journalists and the media workforce, SEO and commercial strategies, as well as training and blocking AI engines. The legal solutions applied to solve those questions are also addressed, including technical solutions, fair use guidelines and legal solutions (litigation, legislative reform, and negotiation). Our conclusion is twofold: first, in the unequal fight against artificial intelligence systems, a utilitarian and entrepreneurial conception of intellectual property is enforced; and second, the position of journalists as authors is weakening.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":44263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tripodos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tripodos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.55.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tripodos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.55.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT 和其他相关人工智能系统的出现,对包括媒体工作者在内的一些工作可能产生的影响提出了许多问题。人们对 OpenAI 和谷歌等人工智能相关公司的学习行为产生了严重的法律担忧。这些问题涉及从新闻资料库中抓取和提取可能未经授权的版权作品,而这些资料库的权利人通常是媒体公司。在本文中,我们旨在对受人工智能影响的新闻编辑室实践和常规工作进行分类。我们还探讨了与版权法相关的问题,包括人工智能辅助报道、其对记者和媒体从业人员的影响、搜索引擎优化和商业策略,以及人工智能引擎的培训和封锁。我们还探讨了解决这些问题的法律方案,包括技术方案、合理使用指南和法律方案(诉讼、立法改革和谈判)。我们的结论有两个方面:第一,在与人工智能系统的不平等斗争中,知识产权的功利主义和企业概念得到了加强;第二,记者作为作者的地位正在削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of AI in the Media Work Force: How Companies Use an Array of Legal Remedies
The emergence of ChatGPT and other related artificial intelligence systems has posed many questions upon the impact that such tools could have on some jobs, including media workers. Serious legal concerns have arisen regarding the learning practices of AI-related companies such as OpenAI and Google. These concerns involve crawling and extracting presumably unauthorized copyright works from news repositories, whose rightholders are often media companies. In this article, we aim to categorize the newsroom practices and routines affected by artificial intelligence. We also explore copyright-law related issues, including AI-assisted reporting, its impact on journalists and the media workforce, SEO and commercial strategies, as well as training and blocking AI engines. The legal solutions applied to solve those questions are also addressed, including technical solutions, fair use guidelines and legal solutions (litigation, legislative reform, and negotiation). Our conclusion is twofold: first, in the unequal fight against artificial intelligence systems, a utilitarian and entrepreneurial conception of intellectual property is enforced; and second, the position of journalists as authors is weakening.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tripodos
Tripodos COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信