评估脉冲磁疗和光疗在治疗膝关节骨性关节炎中的镇痛效果

Yuri Yu. Byalovsky, Aleksey V. Ivanov, I. Rakitina, Marina Yu. Mareeva
{"title":"评估脉冲磁疗和光疗在治疗膝关节骨性关节炎中的镇痛效果","authors":"Yuri Yu. Byalovsky, Aleksey V. Ivanov, I. Rakitina, Marina Yu. Mareeva","doi":"10.17816/rjpbr626545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is a common form of degenerative-inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system with significant impairment of motor function, which is one of the main causes of disability in the population. \nAIM: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of the use of electromagnetic field and light radiation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial included 90 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint (Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis grade II). They were divided into three groups: group I (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy; group 2 (30 patients) receiving light therapy; and group III (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy and light therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale and Laitinen scales before and after a series of procedures. \nRESULTS: A significant analgesic effect after treatment was obtained in each of the study groups, since between the groups there were significant differences in pain intensity according to VAS before and after the procedures. In group I, when treated with an electromagnetic field, the difference was 27.5 mm; in group II, which received light therapy, the difference was 13.4 mm; and in group III, when treated with an electromagnetic field and light, the difference was 21.7 mm. According to the Laitinen scale, the differences were smaller, although the distribution was similar. \nCONCLUSION: The therapy used has shown that pulsed electromagnetic therapy provides the greatest positive results in reducing pain in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joints. Combined magnetic field therapy and light treatment showed somewhat less but significant analgesic effectiveness. Light therapy used alone appears to have the least analgesic effect.","PeriodicalId":226051,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the analgesic effectiveness of pulsed magnetic therapy and light therapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint\",\"authors\":\"Yuri Yu. Byalovsky, Aleksey V. Ivanov, I. Rakitina, Marina Yu. Mareeva\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/rjpbr626545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is a common form of degenerative-inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system with significant impairment of motor function, which is one of the main causes of disability in the population. \\nAIM: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of the use of electromagnetic field and light radiation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial included 90 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint (Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis grade II). They were divided into three groups: group I (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy; group 2 (30 patients) receiving light therapy; and group III (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy and light therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale and Laitinen scales before and after a series of procedures. \\nRESULTS: A significant analgesic effect after treatment was obtained in each of the study groups, since between the groups there were significant differences in pain intensity according to VAS before and after the procedures. In group I, when treated with an electromagnetic field, the difference was 27.5 mm; in group II, which received light therapy, the difference was 13.4 mm; and in group III, when treated with an electromagnetic field and light, the difference was 21.7 mm. According to the Laitinen scale, the differences were smaller, although the distribution was similar. \\nCONCLUSION: The therapy used has shown that pulsed electromagnetic therapy provides the greatest positive results in reducing pain in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joints. Combined magnetic field therapy and light treatment showed somewhat less but significant analgesic effectiveness. Light therapy used alone appears to have the least analgesic effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr626545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr626545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝关节骨性关节炎是一种常见的肌肉骨骼系统退行性炎症性疾病,严重影响运动功能,是导致人口残疾的主要原因之一。目的:评估使用电磁场和光辐射对膝关节骨性关节炎患者的镇痛效果。材料与方法:随机临床试验纳入了 90 名膝关节骨性关节炎患者(凯尔格伦-劳伦斯骨性关节炎 II 级)。他们被分为三组:第一组(30 名患者)接受脉冲磁疗;第二组(30 名患者)接受光疗;第三组(30 名患者)接受脉冲磁疗和光疗。在一系列治疗前后,使用视觉模拟量表和莱特宁量表评估疼痛强度。结果:各研究组在治疗后都获得了明显的镇痛效果,因为根据视觉模拟量表(VAS),各组之间在治疗前后的疼痛强度存在显著差异。第一组使用电磁场治疗时,差异为 27.5 毫米;第二组接受光照治疗时,差异为 13.4 毫米;第三组使用电磁场和光照治疗时,差异为 21.7 毫米。根据莱蒂宁量表,虽然分布相似,但差异较小。结论:所使用的疗法表明,脉冲电磁疗法在治疗膝关节骨性关节炎时能最大程度地减轻疼痛。磁场疗法和光疗法联合使用,镇痛效果稍差,但很显著。单独使用光疗的镇痛效果似乎最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the analgesic effectiveness of pulsed magnetic therapy and light therapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is a common form of degenerative-inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system with significant impairment of motor function, which is one of the main causes of disability in the population. AIM: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of the use of electromagnetic field and light radiation in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial included 90 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint (Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis grade II). They were divided into three groups: group I (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy; group 2 (30 patients) receiving light therapy; and group III (30 patients) who received pulsed magnetic therapy and light therapy. Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale and Laitinen scales before and after a series of procedures. RESULTS: A significant analgesic effect after treatment was obtained in each of the study groups, since between the groups there were significant differences in pain intensity according to VAS before and after the procedures. In group I, when treated with an electromagnetic field, the difference was 27.5 mm; in group II, which received light therapy, the difference was 13.4 mm; and in group III, when treated with an electromagnetic field and light, the difference was 21.7 mm. According to the Laitinen scale, the differences were smaller, although the distribution was similar. CONCLUSION: The therapy used has shown that pulsed electromagnetic therapy provides the greatest positive results in reducing pain in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joints. Combined magnetic field therapy and light treatment showed somewhat less but significant analgesic effectiveness. Light therapy used alone appears to have the least analgesic effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信