{"title":"质子泵抑制剂的合理使用和管理研究","authors":"Naresh Mondal, Shilpi Maity, Alamki Phawa, Bireswar Roy, E. Satheesh Kumar, Narayana Swamy V.B","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the prescribing pattern of use of PPI with respect to “FDA-Approved Indications and Doses for PPI Therapy.” Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, a cross-sectional study was carried out among 400 inpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. The data were collected from the patient case profile and prescriptions and noted in a self-designed data collection form. The statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using SPSS software and Excel. Results: The study, conducted on 400 patients, revealed a male majority (60%) and a female representation of 40%. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), mainly Pantoprazole (74.70%), were frequently prescribed, notably in General Medicine (220 patients). PPI use was generally appropriate: indication (99%), dose (97%), frequency (92.8%), and duration (91.8%). However, irrational prescriptions were noted: indication (1%), dose (3%), frequency (7.3%), and duration (8.3%). 139 drug interactions were identified, categorized into Major (39.6%), Moderate (46%), and Minor (14.4%). For example, Ondansetron and tramadol exhibited a major interaction. Among PPI combinations, 93.75% could affect CYP2C19 metabolism, and 6.3% had additive/synergistic toxicity potential.","PeriodicalId":13313,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study on appropriate use and stewardship of proton pump inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"Naresh Mondal, Shilpi Maity, Alamki Phawa, Bireswar Roy, E. Satheesh Kumar, Narayana Swamy V.B\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To analyze the prescribing pattern of use of PPI with respect to “FDA-Approved Indications and Doses for PPI Therapy.” Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, a cross-sectional study was carried out among 400 inpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. The data were collected from the patient case profile and prescriptions and noted in a self-designed data collection form. The statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using SPSS software and Excel. Results: The study, conducted on 400 patients, revealed a male majority (60%) and a female representation of 40%. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), mainly Pantoprazole (74.70%), were frequently prescribed, notably in General Medicine (220 patients). PPI use was generally appropriate: indication (99%), dose (97%), frequency (92.8%), and duration (91.8%). However, irrational prescriptions were noted: indication (1%), dose (3%), frequency (7.3%), and duration (8.3%). 139 drug interactions were identified, categorized into Major (39.6%), Moderate (46%), and Minor (14.4%). For example, Ondansetron and tramadol exhibited a major interaction. Among PPI combinations, 93.75% could affect CYP2C19 metabolism, and 6.3% had additive/synergistic toxicity potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpp.2024.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的分析根据 "FDA 批准的 PPI 治疗适应症和剂量 "使用 PPI 的处方模式。材料与方法:在获得机构伦理委员会批准后,对班加罗尔一家三级医院的 400 名住院患者进行了横断面研究。研究人员从患者病例和处方中收集数据,并在自行设计的数据收集表中进行记录。使用 SPSS 软件和 Excel 对收集到的数据进行了统计分析。研究结果对 400 名患者进行的研究显示,男性占多数(60%),女性占 40%。质子泵抑制剂(PPI),主要是泮托拉唑(74.70%),是常用处方药,尤其是在全科(220 名患者)中。一般来说,PPI 的使用是适当的:适应症(99%)、剂量(97%)、频率(92.8%)和持续时间(91.8%)。但也有不合理的处方:适应症(1%)、剂量(3%)、频率(7.3%)和持续时间(8.3%)。共发现 139 种药物相互作用,分为严重(39.6%)、中度(46%)和轻微(14.4%)。例如,昂丹司琼与曲马多发生了严重相互作用。在 PPI 联合用药中,93.75% 的药物会影响 CYP2C19 的代谢,6.3% 的药物可能具有相加/协同毒性。
A study on appropriate use and stewardship of proton pump inhibitors
Objective: To analyze the prescribing pattern of use of PPI with respect to “FDA-Approved Indications and Doses for PPI Therapy.” Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee, a cross-sectional study was carried out among 400 inpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Bangalore. The data were collected from the patient case profile and prescriptions and noted in a self-designed data collection form. The statistical analysis of the collected data was performed using SPSS software and Excel. Results: The study, conducted on 400 patients, revealed a male majority (60%) and a female representation of 40%. Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs), mainly Pantoprazole (74.70%), were frequently prescribed, notably in General Medicine (220 patients). PPI use was generally appropriate: indication (99%), dose (97%), frequency (92.8%), and duration (91.8%). However, irrational prescriptions were noted: indication (1%), dose (3%), frequency (7.3%), and duration (8.3%). 139 drug interactions were identified, categorized into Major (39.6%), Moderate (46%), and Minor (14.4%). For example, Ondansetron and tramadol exhibited a major interaction. Among PPI combinations, 93.75% could affect CYP2C19 metabolism, and 6.3% had additive/synergistic toxicity potential.