上腹部手术和单纯乳房切除术中的胸椎节段脊髓麻醉--病例系列

Madhuchanda Borah, Kaveri Das, Bijoy Ahir, ANJALI VERMA, Pydimalla Venkata Gowtham, Karuna Kumar Das, Pritanu Deb Baruah
{"title":"上腹部手术和单纯乳房切除术中的胸椎节段脊髓麻醉--病例系列","authors":"Madhuchanda Borah, Kaveri Das, Bijoy Ahir, ANJALI VERMA, Pydimalla Venkata Gowtham, Karuna Kumar Das, Pritanu Deb Baruah","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To observe safety and efficacy of Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) in upper abdominal and breast surgeries. \nMethods: 14 cases were selected, out of which 6 laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), 4 open cholecystectomy (OC), 3 emergency exploratory laparotomy and 1 simple mastectomy. Under full aseptic precaution, segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia was administered through midline approach in T8-9 space for upper abdominal surgeries and T5-6 space in a simple mastectomy. Using 25G Quincke spinal needle 1.5 ml [7.5 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl was given in abdominal surgeries and 1.2 ml [6 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl in simple mastectomy. \nResults: Age group of patients ranged from 25 to 65 y, Male: Female ratio of 4:10, Body Mass Index (BMI) range of 22 to 24.9 with physiological status of ASA I to ASA III. Hemodynamically, hypotension was observed in every patient after 5-10 min of STSA well managed with fluid and vasopressors with no bradycardia. Average width of sensory block was T3 to L1-2 in upper abdominal surgeries and T1 to T8 in a simple mastectomy. Motor block was Modified Bromage Scale (MBS) of 0 to 1 during and postoperatively. Regarding analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was 0 intraoperatively and 0-1 postoperatively. Sedation score was 2 both intraoperatively and postoperatively with no significant complications and good patient and surgeon satisfaction. \nConclusion: Segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure with good patient and surgeon satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES AND SIMPLE MASTECTOMY-A CASE SERIES\",\"authors\":\"Madhuchanda Borah, Kaveri Das, Bijoy Ahir, ANJALI VERMA, Pydimalla Venkata Gowtham, Karuna Kumar Das, Pritanu Deb Baruah\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To observe safety and efficacy of Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) in upper abdominal and breast surgeries. \\nMethods: 14 cases were selected, out of which 6 laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), 4 open cholecystectomy (OC), 3 emergency exploratory laparotomy and 1 simple mastectomy. Under full aseptic precaution, segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia was administered through midline approach in T8-9 space for upper abdominal surgeries and T5-6 space in a simple mastectomy. Using 25G Quincke spinal needle 1.5 ml [7.5 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl was given in abdominal surgeries and 1.2 ml [6 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl in simple mastectomy. \\nResults: Age group of patients ranged from 25 to 65 y, Male: Female ratio of 4:10, Body Mass Index (BMI) range of 22 to 24.9 with physiological status of ASA I to ASA III. Hemodynamically, hypotension was observed in every patient after 5-10 min of STSA well managed with fluid and vasopressors with no bradycardia. Average width of sensory block was T3 to L1-2 in upper abdominal surgeries and T1 to T8 in a simple mastectomy. Motor block was Modified Bromage Scale (MBS) of 0 to 1 during and postoperatively. Regarding analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was 0 intraoperatively and 0-1 postoperatively. Sedation score was 2 both intraoperatively and postoperatively with no significant complications and good patient and surgeon satisfaction. \\nConclusion: Segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure with good patient and surgeon satisfaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的观察分段胸椎麻醉(STSA)在上腹部和乳房手术中的安全性和有效性。方法:选取 14 个病例,其中 6 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)、4 例开腹胆囊切除术(OC)、3 例急诊探查性开腹手术和 1 例单纯乳房切除术。在完全无菌预防措施下,上腹部手术通过中线T8-9间隙进行胸椎分段麻醉,简单乳房切除术通过T5-6间隙进行胸椎分段麻醉。在腹部手术中使用 25G Quincke 脊柱针头注射 1.5 毫升 [7.5 毫克] 0.5% 异丙基左旋布比卡因混合 0.4 毫升(20 微克)芬太尼,在单纯乳房切除术中注射 1.2 毫升 [6 毫克] 0.5% 异丙基左旋布比卡因混合 0.4 毫升(20 微克)芬太尼。结果:患者年龄介于 25 至 65 岁之间,男女比例为 4:10:男女比例为 4:10,体重指数(BMI)介于 22 至 24.9 之间,生理状态为 ASA I 至 ASA III。血流动力学方面,每位患者在 STSA 5-10 分钟后都会出现低血压,通过输液和使用血管加压剂得到了很好的控制,但没有出现心动过缓。在上腹部手术中,感觉阻滞的平均宽度为 T3 至 L1-2,在单纯乳房切除术中为 T1 至 T8。术中和术后的运动阻滞为改良布罗马格量表(MBS)的 0 至 1。关于镇痛,术中视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分为 0,术后评分为 0-1。术中和术后镇静评分均为 2 分,无明显并发症,患者和外科医生满意度良好。结论分段胸椎麻醉是一种安全有效的手术,患者和外科医生都非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THORACIC SEGMENTAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES AND SIMPLE MASTECTOMY-A CASE SERIES
Objective: To observe safety and efficacy of Segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia (STSA) in upper abdominal and breast surgeries. Methods: 14 cases were selected, out of which 6 laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), 4 open cholecystectomy (OC), 3 emergency exploratory laparotomy and 1 simple mastectomy. Under full aseptic precaution, segmental thoracic spinal anesthesia was administered through midline approach in T8-9 space for upper abdominal surgeries and T5-6 space in a simple mastectomy. Using 25G Quincke spinal needle 1.5 ml [7.5 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl was given in abdominal surgeries and 1.2 ml [6 mg] of 0.5% Isobaric Levobupivacaine mixed with 0.4 ml (20µg) Fentanyl in simple mastectomy. Results: Age group of patients ranged from 25 to 65 y, Male: Female ratio of 4:10, Body Mass Index (BMI) range of 22 to 24.9 with physiological status of ASA I to ASA III. Hemodynamically, hypotension was observed in every patient after 5-10 min of STSA well managed with fluid and vasopressors with no bradycardia. Average width of sensory block was T3 to L1-2 in upper abdominal surgeries and T1 to T8 in a simple mastectomy. Motor block was Modified Bromage Scale (MBS) of 0 to 1 during and postoperatively. Regarding analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was 0 intraoperatively and 0-1 postoperatively. Sedation score was 2 both intraoperatively and postoperatively with no significant complications and good patient and surgeon satisfaction. Conclusion: Segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure with good patient and surgeon satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信