{"title":"氧合剂 \"蓝 m 凝胶 \"与传统牙周敷料 \"Coe-Pak \"对手术脱色后患者偏好参数(疼痛和伤口愈合)的比较评估 - 一项分口研究","authors":"N. Kaur, Umesh Garg, Gurpreet Kaur","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with high lip line and gummy smile when accompanied withdark colored gingiva have an esthetic concern while smiling. For the management of gingival hyperpigmentation surgical technique with scalpel is still considered the gold standard, although healing may occur by secondary intension and oxygen is one of the essential nutrients for cellular metabolism and production of energy through ATP. It is also involved in collagen synthesis, oxygenative killing of bacteria and angiogenesis. To clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of oxygenating agent (Blue M Gel) and traditional periodontal dressing COE-PAK on patient preference parameters (pain and wound healing) after surgical depigmentation. This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on 5 non-smoking individuals aged 20–40 years irrespective of gender with maxillary or mandibular physiologic gingival pigmentation class (III) and (IV) according to the Dummett–Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (10 treated sites) who had requested an esthetic treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation of the maxillary or mandibular gingiva. The maxilla or the mandible was randomly divided into two symmetrical parts i.e. from the right second premolar to the midline and from the midline to the left second premolar—to receive either Blue M gel or Coe-Pak as a periodontal dressing after surgical depigmentation with a scalpel. Patient preference parameters such as pain was assessed after 24 hours and 7 days of intervention and re-epithelisation index with toluidine blue was assessed after 1 week and 1 month of intervention. The result of the study demonstrated that pain score and re-epithelisation score was less in Test group (Blue M Gel) as compared to control group (COE-PAK) and was found to be statistically significant. :It can be concluded that Blue M gel can also be a better alternative as a periodontal dressing compared to COE-PAK due to its properties of better healing and decreasing post-operative pain.","PeriodicalId":201599,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology","volume":"94 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of oxygenating agent “blue m gel” and traditional periodontal dressing “Coe-Pak” on patient preference parameters (Pain and wound healing) after surgical depigmentation – A split mouth study\",\"authors\":\"N. Kaur, Umesh Garg, Gurpreet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Individuals with high lip line and gummy smile when accompanied withdark colored gingiva have an esthetic concern while smiling. For the management of gingival hyperpigmentation surgical technique with scalpel is still considered the gold standard, although healing may occur by secondary intension and oxygen is one of the essential nutrients for cellular metabolism and production of energy through ATP. It is also involved in collagen synthesis, oxygenative killing of bacteria and angiogenesis. To clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of oxygenating agent (Blue M Gel) and traditional periodontal dressing COE-PAK on patient preference parameters (pain and wound healing) after surgical depigmentation. This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on 5 non-smoking individuals aged 20–40 years irrespective of gender with maxillary or mandibular physiologic gingival pigmentation class (III) and (IV) according to the Dummett–Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (10 treated sites) who had requested an esthetic treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation of the maxillary or mandibular gingiva. The maxilla or the mandible was randomly divided into two symmetrical parts i.e. from the right second premolar to the midline and from the midline to the left second premolar—to receive either Blue M gel or Coe-Pak as a periodontal dressing after surgical depigmentation with a scalpel. Patient preference parameters such as pain was assessed after 24 hours and 7 days of intervention and re-epithelisation index with toluidine blue was assessed after 1 week and 1 month of intervention. The result of the study demonstrated that pain score and re-epithelisation score was less in Test group (Blue M Gel) as compared to control group (COE-PAK) and was found to be statistically significant. :It can be concluded that Blue M gel can also be a better alternative as a periodontal dressing compared to COE-PAK due to its properties of better healing and decreasing post-operative pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"94 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
唇线过高和笑起来有牙龈肿胀的人,如果伴有颜色加深的牙龈,在微笑时就会影响美观。对于牙龈色素沉着的治疗,使用手术刀的外科技术仍被认为是金标准,尽管愈合可能是通过二次治疗实现的。它还参与胶原蛋白合成、氧杀细菌和血管生成。临床评估和比较氧合剂(Blue M Gel)和传统牙周敷料 COE-PAK 对手术脱色后患者偏好参数(疼痛和伤口愈合)的有效性。这项分口随机临床试验的对象是根据杜梅特-古普塔口腔色素沉着指数(Dummett-Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index)划分的上颌或下颌生理性牙龈色素沉着等级(III)和(IV)(10 个治疗部位),年龄在 20-40 岁之间的 5 名非吸烟者,不分性别,他们都要求对上颌或下颌牙龈色素沉着进行美容治疗。上颌或下颌被随机分为两个对称的部分,即从右侧第二前磨牙到中线,以及从中线到左侧第二前磨牙,在用手术刀进行去色素手术后,接受 Blue M 凝胶或 Coe-Pak 作为牙周敷料。在干预 24 小时和 7 天后评估患者的偏好参数(如疼痛),在干预 1 周和 1 个月后评估甲苯胺蓝的再上皮指数。研究结果表明,与对照组(COE-PAK)相比,试验组(Blue M Gel)的疼痛评分和再上皮指数较低,且具有统计学意义。
Comparative evaluation of oxygenating agent “blue m gel” and traditional periodontal dressing “Coe-Pak” on patient preference parameters (Pain and wound healing) after surgical depigmentation – A split mouth study
Individuals with high lip line and gummy smile when accompanied withdark colored gingiva have an esthetic concern while smiling. For the management of gingival hyperpigmentation surgical technique with scalpel is still considered the gold standard, although healing may occur by secondary intension and oxygen is one of the essential nutrients for cellular metabolism and production of energy through ATP. It is also involved in collagen synthesis, oxygenative killing of bacteria and angiogenesis. To clinically evaluate and compare the effectiveness of oxygenating agent (Blue M Gel) and traditional periodontal dressing COE-PAK on patient preference parameters (pain and wound healing) after surgical depigmentation. This split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted on 5 non-smoking individuals aged 20–40 years irrespective of gender with maxillary or mandibular physiologic gingival pigmentation class (III) and (IV) according to the Dummett–Gupta Oral Pigmentation Index (10 treated sites) who had requested an esthetic treatment for gingival hyperpigmentation of the maxillary or mandibular gingiva. The maxilla or the mandible was randomly divided into two symmetrical parts i.e. from the right second premolar to the midline and from the midline to the left second premolar—to receive either Blue M gel or Coe-Pak as a periodontal dressing after surgical depigmentation with a scalpel. Patient preference parameters such as pain was assessed after 24 hours and 7 days of intervention and re-epithelisation index with toluidine blue was assessed after 1 week and 1 month of intervention. The result of the study demonstrated that pain score and re-epithelisation score was less in Test group (Blue M Gel) as compared to control group (COE-PAK) and was found to be statistically significant. :It can be concluded that Blue M gel can also be a better alternative as a periodontal dressing compared to COE-PAK due to its properties of better healing and decreasing post-operative pain.