针对具有不确定混合标准值的多标准决策问题的基于模拟的 DEA 方法

Shiling Song, Ye Zhang, Jianhui Xie, Sheng Ang, Feng Yang
{"title":"针对具有不确定混合标准值的多标准决策问题的基于模拟的 DEA 方法","authors":"Shiling Song, Ye Zhang, Jianhui Xie, Sheng Ang, Feng Yang","doi":"10.1051/ro/2024113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ex-ante decision scenarios, predicting criterion values accurately is difficult for decision makers (DMs). Inconsiderable work is normally required for measuring criteria by uncertain random values or ordinal values. However, in the classical data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, criterion values are the constants that limit the application of the classical DEA model in ex-ante decision scenarios. This paper presents a simulation-based DEA approach, which captures random and ordinal criterion values by a simple and direct simulation-based approach. The approach includes three steps. In the first step, Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to convert uncertain random values or ordinal values into cardinal data. In the second step, we use traditional DEA methods to compute the efficiency score of decision-making units (DMUs). In the third step, we ranked all DMUs by calculating the DEA-efficient acceptability of each DMU in multiple simulations and then selected the optimal DMU. The proposed approach is illustrated by experimental examples and a case study of a municipal wastewater treatment system.","PeriodicalId":506995,"journal":{"name":"RAIRO - Operations Research","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simulation-based DEA approach for multiple criterion decision-making problems with uncertain mixed-criteria values\",\"authors\":\"Shiling Song, Ye Zhang, Jianhui Xie, Sheng Ang, Feng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ro/2024113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In ex-ante decision scenarios, predicting criterion values accurately is difficult for decision makers (DMs). Inconsiderable work is normally required for measuring criteria by uncertain random values or ordinal values. However, in the classical data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, criterion values are the constants that limit the application of the classical DEA model in ex-ante decision scenarios. This paper presents a simulation-based DEA approach, which captures random and ordinal criterion values by a simple and direct simulation-based approach. The approach includes three steps. In the first step, Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to convert uncertain random values or ordinal values into cardinal data. In the second step, we use traditional DEA methods to compute the efficiency score of decision-making units (DMUs). In the third step, we ranked all DMUs by calculating the DEA-efficient acceptability of each DMU in multiple simulations and then selected the optimal DMU. The proposed approach is illustrated by experimental examples and a case study of a municipal wastewater treatment system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAIRO - Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAIRO - Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAIRO - Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在事前决策情景中,决策者(DMs)很难准确预测标准值。用不确定的随机值或序数值来衡量标准值通常需要做大量的工作。然而,在经典数据包络分析(DEA)模型中,标准值是常量,这限制了经典 DEA 模型在事前决策场景中的应用。本文提出了一种基于模拟的 DEA 方法,通过简单直接的模拟方法捕捉随机和序数标准值。该方法包括三个步骤。第一步,使用蒙特卡洛模拟方法将不确定的随机值或序数值转换为心数数据。第二步,我们使用传统的 DEA 方法计算决策单元(DMU)的效率得分。第三步,通过多次模拟计算每个 DMU 的 DEA 效率可接受性,对所有 DMU 进行排序,然后选出最优 DMU。我们通过实验示例和一个城市污水处理系统的案例研究对所提出的方法进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simulation-based DEA approach for multiple criterion decision-making problems with uncertain mixed-criteria values
In ex-ante decision scenarios, predicting criterion values accurately is difficult for decision makers (DMs). Inconsiderable work is normally required for measuring criteria by uncertain random values or ordinal values. However, in the classical data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, criterion values are the constants that limit the application of the classical DEA model in ex-ante decision scenarios. This paper presents a simulation-based DEA approach, which captures random and ordinal criterion values by a simple and direct simulation-based approach. The approach includes three steps. In the first step, Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to convert uncertain random values or ordinal values into cardinal data. In the second step, we use traditional DEA methods to compute the efficiency score of decision-making units (DMUs). In the third step, we ranked all DMUs by calculating the DEA-efficient acceptability of each DMU in multiple simulations and then selected the optimal DMU. The proposed approach is illustrated by experimental examples and a case study of a municipal wastewater treatment system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信