美国新泽西州地质记录中风暴事件的保存情况

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Kristen M. Joyse, Jennifer S. Walker, Linda Godfrey, Margaret A. Christie, Timothy A. Shaw, D. Reide Corbett, Robert E. Kopp, Benjamin P. Horton
{"title":"美国新泽西州地质记录中风暴事件的保存情况","authors":"Kristen M. Joyse,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Walker,&nbsp;Linda Godfrey,&nbsp;Margaret A. Christie,&nbsp;Timothy A. Shaw,&nbsp;D. Reide Corbett,&nbsp;Robert E. Kopp,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Horton","doi":"10.1002/jqs.3622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Geologic reconstructions of overwash events can extend storm records beyond the brief instrumental record. However, the return periods of storms calculated from geologic records alone may underestimate the frequency of events given the preservation bias of geologic records. Here, we compare a geologic reconstruction of storm activity from a salt marsh in New Jersey to two neighboring instrumental records at the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges. Eight overwash deposits were identified within the marsh's stratigraphy by their fan-shaped morphology and coarser mean grain size (3.6 ± 0.7 φ) compared to autochthonous sediments they were embedded in (5.6 ± 0.8 φ). We used an age–depth model based on modern chronohorizons and three radiocarbon dates to provide age constraints for the overwash deposits. Seven of the overwash deposits were attributed to historical storms, including the youngest overwash deposit from Hurricane Sandy in 2012. The four youngest overwash deposits overlap with instrumental records. In contrast, the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges recorded eight and 11 extreme water levels above the 10% annual expected probability (AEP) of exceedance level, respectively, between 1932/1920 and the present. The geologic record in northern New Jersey, therefore, has a 36–50% preservation potential of capturing extreme water levels above the 10% AEP level.</p>","PeriodicalId":16929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quaternary Science","volume":"39 5","pages":"801-815"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jqs.3622","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The preservation of storm events in the geologic record of New Jersey, USA\",\"authors\":\"Kristen M. Joyse,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Walker,&nbsp;Linda Godfrey,&nbsp;Margaret A. Christie,&nbsp;Timothy A. Shaw,&nbsp;D. Reide Corbett,&nbsp;Robert E. Kopp,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jqs.3622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Geologic reconstructions of overwash events can extend storm records beyond the brief instrumental record. However, the return periods of storms calculated from geologic records alone may underestimate the frequency of events given the preservation bias of geologic records. Here, we compare a geologic reconstruction of storm activity from a salt marsh in New Jersey to two neighboring instrumental records at the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges. Eight overwash deposits were identified within the marsh's stratigraphy by their fan-shaped morphology and coarser mean grain size (3.6 ± 0.7 φ) compared to autochthonous sediments they were embedded in (5.6 ± 0.8 φ). We used an age–depth model based on modern chronohorizons and three radiocarbon dates to provide age constraints for the overwash deposits. Seven of the overwash deposits were attributed to historical storms, including the youngest overwash deposit from Hurricane Sandy in 2012. The four youngest overwash deposits overlap with instrumental records. In contrast, the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges recorded eight and 11 extreme water levels above the 10% annual expected probability (AEP) of exceedance level, respectively, between 1932/1920 and the present. The geologic record in northern New Jersey, therefore, has a 36–50% preservation potential of capturing extreme water levels above the 10% AEP level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quaternary Science\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"801-815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jqs.3622\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quaternary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jqs.3622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quaternary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jqs.3622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对冲刷事件的地质重建可以将风暴记录扩展到短暂的仪器记录之外。然而,鉴于地质记录的保存偏差,仅根据地质记录计算出的风暴回归期可能会低估事件发生的频率。在这里,我们将新泽西州盐沼的风暴活动地质重建与桑迪胡克和巴特里验潮仪的两个相邻仪器记录进行了比较。沼泽地层中的八种冲刷沉积物是通过其扇形形态和较粗的平均粒径(3.6 ± 0.7 φ)(与它们所嵌入的自生沉积物(5.6 ± 0.8 φ)相比)来识别的。我们利用基于现代时序和三个放射性碳年代的年龄深度模型,为覆岩沉积提供了年龄约束。其中 7 个冲刷沉积物归因于历史风暴,包括 2012 年飓风桑迪造成的最年轻的冲刷沉积物。四个最年轻的冲刷沉积物与仪器记录重叠。相比之下,1932/1920 年至今,桑迪胡克和巴特里验潮仪分别记录了 8 次和 11 次超过 10% 年预期概率 (AEP) 的极端水位。因此,新泽西州北部的地质记录有 36-50% 的保存潜力可捕捉到超过 10% AEP 水平的极端水位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The preservation of storm events in the geologic record of New Jersey, USA

The preservation of storm events in the geologic record of New Jersey, USA

Geologic reconstructions of overwash events can extend storm records beyond the brief instrumental record. However, the return periods of storms calculated from geologic records alone may underestimate the frequency of events given the preservation bias of geologic records. Here, we compare a geologic reconstruction of storm activity from a salt marsh in New Jersey to two neighboring instrumental records at the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges. Eight overwash deposits were identified within the marsh's stratigraphy by their fan-shaped morphology and coarser mean grain size (3.6 ± 0.7 φ) compared to autochthonous sediments they were embedded in (5.6 ± 0.8 φ). We used an age–depth model based on modern chronohorizons and three radiocarbon dates to provide age constraints for the overwash deposits. Seven of the overwash deposits were attributed to historical storms, including the youngest overwash deposit from Hurricane Sandy in 2012. The four youngest overwash deposits overlap with instrumental records. In contrast, the Sandy Hook and Battery tide gauges recorded eight and 11 extreme water levels above the 10% annual expected probability (AEP) of exceedance level, respectively, between 1932/1920 and the present. The geologic record in northern New Jersey, therefore, has a 36–50% preservation potential of capturing extreme water levels above the 10% AEP level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quaternary Science
Journal of Quaternary Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quaternary Science publishes original papers on any field of Quaternary research, and aims to promote a wider appreciation and deeper understanding of the earth''s history during the last 2.58 million years. Papers from a wide range of disciplines appear in JQS including, for example, Archaeology, Botany, Climatology, Geochemistry, Geochronology, Geology, Geomorphology, Geophysics, Glaciology, Limnology, Oceanography, Palaeoceanography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Palaeontology, Soil Science and Zoology. The journal particularly welcomes papers reporting the results of interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary research which are of wide international interest to Quaternary scientists. Short communications and correspondence relating to views and information contained in JQS may also be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信