中国命运共同体政策(CCSDP)对发展的影响及其对非洲贸易和种族问题的影响

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Odette Tougem Tasinda, Tian Ze, Bernard Boamah Bekoe, Sunday Adiyoh Imanche, Brandy Perkwang Taty, Raphael Fomukong Tasinda, Innocent Tayari Mwizerwa
{"title":"中国命运共同体政策(CCSDP)对发展的影响及其对非洲贸易和种族问题的影响","authors":"Odette Tougem Tasinda, Tian Ze, Bernard Boamah Bekoe, Sunday Adiyoh Imanche, Brandy Perkwang Taty, Raphael Fomukong Tasinda, Innocent Tayari Mwizerwa","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-02-2024-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper reports on the impact of China's Community of Shared Destiny Policy (CCSDP) on ethnicity, and the development and trade benefits in Africa, whilst proposing suggestions for improvements.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-research (desktop-based and online survey-based) approach was employed.FindingsTrade and foreign direct investment alone can account for 11.8% of changes in the peaceful coexistence of China and some selected African countries, and cause changes to the mutual prosperity of China and African nations, to the tune of 6.3%. Therefore, the activation of mutual prosperity among these nations is not necessarily trade and foreign direct investment. The CCSDP is effective and has increased economic development for ethnic groups (50%), although with some negative concerns.Research limitations/implicationsInadequate/small sample size for the study.Originality/valueChinese investment in Africa has had a transformative impact, driving economic growth, improving infrastructure, and fostering regional integration. The share of trade between China and Africa in the continent's overall external trade has increased dramatically. Overall, the CCSDP should be kept in place, but with some modifications to improve its effectiveness and mitigate its negative effects. Finally, as China's engagement with Africa evolves, it is vital that partnerships are founded on mutual understanding, respect, and benefit, and that policies reflect the different needs and ambitions of African communities.","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of China's community of shared destiny policy (CCSDP) on development and its bearing on trade and ethnicity in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Odette Tougem Tasinda, Tian Ze, Bernard Boamah Bekoe, Sunday Adiyoh Imanche, Brandy Perkwang Taty, Raphael Fomukong Tasinda, Innocent Tayari Mwizerwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijssp-02-2024-0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper reports on the impact of China's Community of Shared Destiny Policy (CCSDP) on ethnicity, and the development and trade benefits in Africa, whilst proposing suggestions for improvements.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-research (desktop-based and online survey-based) approach was employed.FindingsTrade and foreign direct investment alone can account for 11.8% of changes in the peaceful coexistence of China and some selected African countries, and cause changes to the mutual prosperity of China and African nations, to the tune of 6.3%. Therefore, the activation of mutual prosperity among these nations is not necessarily trade and foreign direct investment. The CCSDP is effective and has increased economic development for ethnic groups (50%), although with some negative concerns.Research limitations/implicationsInadequate/small sample size for the study.Originality/valueChinese investment in Africa has had a transformative impact, driving economic growth, improving infrastructure, and fostering regional integration. The share of trade between China and Africa in the continent's overall external trade has increased dramatically. Overall, the CCSDP should be kept in place, but with some modifications to improve its effectiveness and mitigate its negative effects. Finally, as China's engagement with Africa evolves, it is vital that partnerships are founded on mutual understanding, respect, and benefit, and that policies reflect the different needs and ambitions of African communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-02-2024-0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-02-2024-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报告了中国命运共同体政策(CCSDP)对非洲民族、发展和贸易利益的影响,同时提出了改进建议。研究结果仅贸易和外国直接投资就可占中国与部分选定非洲国家和平共处变化的 11.8%,并导致中国与非洲国家共同繁荣变化的 6.3%。因此,激活这些国家之间共同繁荣的不一定是贸易和外国直接投资。研究局限性/影响研究样本量不足/较小。原创性/价值中国在非洲的投资产生了变革性影响,推动了经济增长,改善了基础设施,促进了地区一体化。中国与非洲之间的贸易在非洲大陆整体对外贸易中所占的份额大幅增加。总体而言,CCSDP 应继续保留,但应进行一些修改,以提高其有效性并减轻其负面影响。最后,随着中国与非洲交往的发展,伙伴关系必须建立在相互理解、尊重和互利的基础上,政策必须反映非洲社会的不同需求和抱负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of China's community of shared destiny policy (CCSDP) on development and its bearing on trade and ethnicity in Africa
PurposeThis paper reports on the impact of China's Community of Shared Destiny Policy (CCSDP) on ethnicity, and the development and trade benefits in Africa, whilst proposing suggestions for improvements.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-research (desktop-based and online survey-based) approach was employed.FindingsTrade and foreign direct investment alone can account for 11.8% of changes in the peaceful coexistence of China and some selected African countries, and cause changes to the mutual prosperity of China and African nations, to the tune of 6.3%. Therefore, the activation of mutual prosperity among these nations is not necessarily trade and foreign direct investment. The CCSDP is effective and has increased economic development for ethnic groups (50%), although with some negative concerns.Research limitations/implicationsInadequate/small sample size for the study.Originality/valueChinese investment in Africa has had a transformative impact, driving economic growth, improving infrastructure, and fostering regional integration. The share of trade between China and Africa in the continent's overall external trade has increased dramatically. Overall, the CCSDP should be kept in place, but with some modifications to improve its effectiveness and mitigate its negative effects. Finally, as China's engagement with Africa evolves, it is vital that partnerships are founded on mutual understanding, respect, and benefit, and that policies reflect the different needs and ambitions of African communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信