评估蒙赛尔土壤颜色在建立和评估土壤粘土含量预测光谱模型中的实用性

S. Dharumarajan, C. Gomez, M. Lalitha, R. Vasundhara, R. Hegde, N. G. Patil
{"title":"评估蒙赛尔土壤颜色在建立和评估土壤粘土含量预测光谱模型中的实用性","authors":"S. Dharumarajan,&nbsp;C. Gomez,&nbsp;M. Lalitha,&nbsp;R. Vasundhara,&nbsp;R. Hegde,&nbsp;N. G. Patil","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study examined how the use of soil color can help build and evaluate clay content prediction models from laboratory visible and near infrared spectroscopic data. This study was based on a regional database containing 449 soil samples collected over Karnataka state in India, which has been divided into red soils (240 samples) and black soils (209 samples) based on their Munsell soil color. Partial least squares regression models were calibrated and validated from both the regional datasets and subsets stratified as red and black soils. In addition, a random forest model was used to classify the validation soil samples into black and red classes to evaluate models’ performance. First, while the clay content predicted by the regression model built from regional data was evaluated as correct at regional scale (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.75), this model was evaluated as more accurate over black (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.8) than red (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.63) soil samples. Second, the regression models built from subsets stratified per soil color provided different performances than the regression model built from the regional data, both at the regional scale and soil color scale. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that (1) predictions are highly dependent on calibration data, (2) the interpretation of prediction performances relies heavily on validation data, and (3) pedological knowledge, such as soil color, can be effectively employed as an encouraging covariate in both the construction and evaluation of regression models.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the utility of Munsell soil color in building and evaluating spectral models for soil clay content prediction\",\"authors\":\"S. Dharumarajan,&nbsp;C. Gomez,&nbsp;M. Lalitha,&nbsp;R. Vasundhara,&nbsp;R. Hegde,&nbsp;N. G. Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present study examined how the use of soil color can help build and evaluate clay content prediction models from laboratory visible and near infrared spectroscopic data. This study was based on a regional database containing 449 soil samples collected over Karnataka state in India, which has been divided into red soils (240 samples) and black soils (209 samples) based on their Munsell soil color. Partial least squares regression models were calibrated and validated from both the regional datasets and subsets stratified as red and black soils. In addition, a random forest model was used to classify the validation soil samples into black and red classes to evaluate models’ performance. First, while the clay content predicted by the regression model built from regional data was evaluated as correct at regional scale (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.75), this model was evaluated as more accurate over black (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.8) than red (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> of 0.63) soil samples. Second, the regression models built from subsets stratified per soil color provided different performances than the regression model built from the regional data, both at the regional scale and soil color scale. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that (1) predictions are highly dependent on calibration data, (2) the interpretation of prediction performances relies heavily on validation data, and (3) pedological knowledge, such as soil color, can be effectively employed as an encouraging covariate in both the construction and evaluation of regression models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了如何利用土壤颜色来帮助根据实验室可见光和近红外光谱数据建立和评估粘土含量预测模型。该研究基于一个区域数据库,该数据库包含在印度卡纳塔克邦采集的 449 个土壤样本,根据土壤的蒙赛尔色分为红壤(240 个样本)和黑土(209 个样本)。根据区域数据集和分为红壤和黑壤的子集,对偏最小二乘法回归模型进行了校准和验证。此外,还使用随机森林模型将验证土壤样本分为黑色和红色两类,以评估模型的性能。首先,虽然根据区域数据建立的回归模型在区域范围内预测的粘土含量被认为是正确的(R2 值为 0.75),但该模型在黑土(R2 值为 0.8)比红土(R2 值为 0.63)上的准确性更高。其次,在区域尺度和土壤颜色尺度上,根据土壤颜色分层子集建立的回归模型与根据区域数据建立的回归模型性能不同。总之,本研究表明:(1) 预测在很大程度上依赖于校准数据;(2) 预测结果的解释在很大程度上依赖于验证数据;(3) 在回归模型的构建和评估过程中,土壤颜色等土壤学知识可以有效地用作鼓励性协变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the utility of Munsell soil color in building and evaluating spectral models for soil clay content prediction

The present study examined how the use of soil color can help build and evaluate clay content prediction models from laboratory visible and near infrared spectroscopic data. This study was based on a regional database containing 449 soil samples collected over Karnataka state in India, which has been divided into red soils (240 samples) and black soils (209 samples) based on their Munsell soil color. Partial least squares regression models were calibrated and validated from both the regional datasets and subsets stratified as red and black soils. In addition, a random forest model was used to classify the validation soil samples into black and red classes to evaluate models’ performance. First, while the clay content predicted by the regression model built from regional data was evaluated as correct at regional scale (R2val of 0.75), this model was evaluated as more accurate over black (R2val of 0.8) than red (R2val of 0.63) soil samples. Second, the regression models built from subsets stratified per soil color provided different performances than the regression model built from the regional data, both at the regional scale and soil color scale. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that (1) predictions are highly dependent on calibration data, (2) the interpretation of prediction performances relies heavily on validation data, and (3) pedological knowledge, such as soil color, can be effectively employed as an encouraging covariate in both the construction and evaluation of regression models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信