优化微波辅助萃取,利用液相色谱-质谱法定量大麻茶中的大麻素

IF 1.3 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Marios C. Christodoulou, Diego J. Gonzalez‐Serrano, A. Christou, Ioannis J. Stavrou, Milad Hadidi, Andres Moreno, Constantina P. Kapnissi‐Christodoulou
{"title":"优化微波辅助萃取,利用液相色谱-质谱法定量大麻茶中的大麻素","authors":"Marios C. Christodoulou, Diego J. Gonzalez‐Serrano, A. Christou, Ioannis J. Stavrou, Milad Hadidi, Andres Moreno, Constantina P. Kapnissi‐Christodoulou","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202300220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) of cannabinoids from hemp tea was optimized, for the first, using response surface methodology. The effect of temperature (50, 65, and 80°C), irradiation time (4, 7, and 10 min), and solvent‐to‐solid ratio (20, 30, and 40 mL of methanol/g of hemp tea) on cannabinoid extractability were investigated. The concentrations of five cannabinoids, namely Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), and cannabinol (CBN), were selected as response variables. For the quantitative analysis, a liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry method was developed and validated. The proposed analytical approach demonstrated satisfactory performance characteristics in terms of linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9998), precision (intra‐day: 1.99%–5.97% relative standard deviation [%RSD], inter‐day: 1.95%–6.08%RSD), sensitivity (limit of detection: 1.35–2.36 ng/g, limit of quantification: 4.05–7.08 ng/g) and carry‐over effect (signals ≤ 5.03%), with all cannabinoids eluting within 6 min. For comparison purposes, soxhlet extraction, ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE), and conventional‐stirring extraction were additionally performed. MAE proved to be a more effective technique for the extraction of CBD and CBN, while UAE managed to extract Δ9‐THC, CBG, and CBC at higher concentration levels.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of microwave‐assisted extraction for quantification of cannabinoids in hemp tea by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"Marios C. Christodoulou, Diego J. Gonzalez‐Serrano, A. Christou, Ioannis J. Stavrou, Milad Hadidi, Andres Moreno, Constantina P. Kapnissi‐Christodoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sscp.202300220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) of cannabinoids from hemp tea was optimized, for the first, using response surface methodology. The effect of temperature (50, 65, and 80°C), irradiation time (4, 7, and 10 min), and solvent‐to‐solid ratio (20, 30, and 40 mL of methanol/g of hemp tea) on cannabinoid extractability were investigated. The concentrations of five cannabinoids, namely Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), and cannabinol (CBN), were selected as response variables. For the quantitative analysis, a liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry method was developed and validated. The proposed analytical approach demonstrated satisfactory performance characteristics in terms of linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9998), precision (intra‐day: 1.99%–5.97% relative standard deviation [%RSD], inter‐day: 1.95%–6.08%RSD), sensitivity (limit of detection: 1.35–2.36 ng/g, limit of quantification: 4.05–7.08 ng/g) and carry‐over effect (signals ≤ 5.03%), with all cannabinoids eluting within 6 min. For comparison purposes, soxhlet extraction, ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE), and conventional‐stirring extraction were additionally performed. MAE proved to be a more effective technique for the extraction of CBD and CBN, while UAE managed to extract Δ9‐THC, CBG, and CBC at higher concentration levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

首次采用响应面方法对微波辅助萃取(MAE)麻茶中的大麻素进行了优化。研究了温度(50、65 和 80°C)、辐照时间(4、7 和 10 分钟)和溶剂与固体比率(20、30 和 40 毫升甲醇/克大麻茶)对大麻素萃取率的影响。五种大麻素,即Δ9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)、大麻二酚(CBD)、大麻酚(CBG)、大麻色烯(CBC)和大麻酚(CBN)的浓度被选为响应变量。为进行定量分析,开发并验证了一种液相色谱-质谱法。所提议的分析方法在线性(R2 ≥ 0.9998)、精确度(日内:1.99%-5.97%,相对值:1.99%-5.97相对标准偏差[%RSD]为 1.99%-5.97%,日间精密度为 1.95%-6.08%:灵敏度(检测限:1.35-2.36 纳克/克,定量限:4.05-7.08 纳克/克)和携带效应(信号 ≤ 5.03%),所有大麻素均在 6 分钟内洗脱。为便于比较,还进行了索氏萃取、超声辅助萃取(UAE)和传统搅拌萃取。事实证明,MAE 是提取 CBD 和 CBN 的一种更有效的技术,而 UAE 则能以更高的浓度水平提取 Δ9-THC、CBG 和 CBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of microwave‐assisted extraction for quantification of cannabinoids in hemp tea by liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
Microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) of cannabinoids from hemp tea was optimized, for the first, using response surface methodology. The effect of temperature (50, 65, and 80°C), irradiation time (4, 7, and 10 min), and solvent‐to‐solid ratio (20, 30, and 40 mL of methanol/g of hemp tea) on cannabinoid extractability were investigated. The concentrations of five cannabinoids, namely Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9‐THC), cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), and cannabinol (CBN), were selected as response variables. For the quantitative analysis, a liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry method was developed and validated. The proposed analytical approach demonstrated satisfactory performance characteristics in terms of linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9998), precision (intra‐day: 1.99%–5.97% relative standard deviation [%RSD], inter‐day: 1.95%–6.08%RSD), sensitivity (limit of detection: 1.35–2.36 ng/g, limit of quantification: 4.05–7.08 ng/g) and carry‐over effect (signals ≤ 5.03%), with all cannabinoids eluting within 6 min. For comparison purposes, soxhlet extraction, ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE), and conventional‐stirring extraction were additionally performed. MAE proved to be a more effective technique for the extraction of CBD and CBN, while UAE managed to extract Δ9‐THC, CBG, and CBC at higher concentration levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信