加勒比群岛的黑曜石?小安的列斯群岛神秘的陶瓷时代玻璃制品

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeometry Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1111/arcm.12980
Arthur Leck, Ludovic Bellot-Gurlet, Guillaume Carazzo, Bernard Gratuze, Jessica Langlade, François-Xavier Le Bourdonnec, Céline Leandri, Isaac Shearn, Christian Stouvenot, Alain Queffelec
{"title":"加勒比群岛的黑曜石?小安的列斯群岛神秘的陶瓷时代玻璃制品","authors":"Arthur Leck,&nbsp;Ludovic Bellot-Gurlet,&nbsp;Guillaume Carazzo,&nbsp;Bernard Gratuze,&nbsp;Jessica Langlade,&nbsp;François-Xavier Le Bourdonnec,&nbsp;Céline Leandri,&nbsp;Isaac Shearn,&nbsp;Christian Stouvenot,&nbsp;Alain Queffelec","doi":"10.1111/arcm.12980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Caribbean islands witnessed a population expansion of ceramic-using horticulturalists during the Early Ceramic Age (ca. 500 BC to 750 AD) from the Orinoco Valley to Puerto Rico. We examined 18 lithic artefacts from Guadeloupe and Dominica initially thought to be obsidian, a material believed to be absent from those islands. We investigated the volcanic or meteoritic origin of this unique and yet unknown material through observation (binocular, SEM, microtomography) and geochemical analyses (PIXE, SEM-EDS, ED-XRF, EPMA, LA-ICP-MS). Elemental analyses rule out the hypothesis of an origin from a meteoritic impact (i.e. identification as tektites). Most of the artefacts have an andesitic composition (&lt;63% SiO<sub>2</sub>), which appears to be unique among ‘massive’ glasses. The only artefact with a rhyolitic composition has been traced back to the Guadeloupe's Volcan du Tuf, where glassy fragments have been collected and analysed. The geological source of the other vitreous artefacts that exhibit an andesitic composition could be from a sublocal subduction-arc volcanism (maybe from Martinique), although no volcanic vitreous material of this kind has ever been reported worldwide. These results once again highlight the regional mobility of Early Ceramic populations and the production of standard lithic products using a highly original, albeit low-quality, local lithic resource, and provide valuable references for future identification of similar materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"66 6","pages":"1255-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.12980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obsidian in the Caribbean islands? Mysterious Ceramic Age glass artefacts in the Lesser Antilles\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Leck,&nbsp;Ludovic Bellot-Gurlet,&nbsp;Guillaume Carazzo,&nbsp;Bernard Gratuze,&nbsp;Jessica Langlade,&nbsp;François-Xavier Le Bourdonnec,&nbsp;Céline Leandri,&nbsp;Isaac Shearn,&nbsp;Christian Stouvenot,&nbsp;Alain Queffelec\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/arcm.12980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Caribbean islands witnessed a population expansion of ceramic-using horticulturalists during the Early Ceramic Age (ca. 500 BC to 750 AD) from the Orinoco Valley to Puerto Rico. We examined 18 lithic artefacts from Guadeloupe and Dominica initially thought to be obsidian, a material believed to be absent from those islands. We investigated the volcanic or meteoritic origin of this unique and yet unknown material through observation (binocular, SEM, microtomography) and geochemical analyses (PIXE, SEM-EDS, ED-XRF, EPMA, LA-ICP-MS). Elemental analyses rule out the hypothesis of an origin from a meteoritic impact (i.e. identification as tektites). Most of the artefacts have an andesitic composition (&lt;63% SiO<sub>2</sub>), which appears to be unique among ‘massive’ glasses. The only artefact with a rhyolitic composition has been traced back to the Guadeloupe's Volcan du Tuf, where glassy fragments have been collected and analysed. The geological source of the other vitreous artefacts that exhibit an andesitic composition could be from a sublocal subduction-arc volcanism (maybe from Martinique), although no volcanic vitreous material of this kind has ever been reported worldwide. These results once again highlight the regional mobility of Early Ceramic populations and the production of standard lithic products using a highly original, albeit low-quality, local lithic resource, and provide valuable references for future identification of similar materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"66 6\",\"pages\":\"1255-1279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.12980\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.12980\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.12980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在早期陶器时代(约公元前 500 年至公元 750 年),使用陶瓷的园艺家从奥里诺科河流域向波多黎各扩张,加勒比群岛的人口也随之扩张。我们研究了来自瓜德罗普岛和多米尼克的 18 件石器,最初认为这些石器是黑曜石,而黑曜石被认为是这些岛屿所没有的材料。我们通过观察(双目观察、扫描电镜、显微层析成像)和地球化学分析(PIXE、扫描电镜-电子显微镜、ED-XRF、EPMA、LA-ICP-MS),研究了这种独特而未知材料的火山或陨石起源。元素分析排除了起源于陨石撞击的假设(即确定为陨石)。大多数人工制品都具有安山岩成分(SiO2 <63%),这在 "块状 "玻璃中似乎是独一无二的。唯一具有流纹岩成分的人工制品被追溯到瓜德罗普岛的图夫火山,在那里收集并分析了玻璃碎片。其他具有安山岩成分的玻璃质工艺品的地质来源可能是当地的次俯冲弧火山活动(可能来自马提尼克岛),但全世界从未有过此类火山玻璃质材料的报道。这些结果再次凸显了早期陶器人口的地区流动性,以及利用当地低质量但极具独创性的石器资源生产标准石制品的情况,并为今后鉴定类似材料提供了宝贵的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obsidian in the Caribbean islands? Mysterious Ceramic Age glass artefacts in the Lesser Antilles

Obsidian in the Caribbean islands? Mysterious Ceramic Age glass artefacts in the Lesser Antilles

The Caribbean islands witnessed a population expansion of ceramic-using horticulturalists during the Early Ceramic Age (ca. 500 BC to 750 AD) from the Orinoco Valley to Puerto Rico. We examined 18 lithic artefacts from Guadeloupe and Dominica initially thought to be obsidian, a material believed to be absent from those islands. We investigated the volcanic or meteoritic origin of this unique and yet unknown material through observation (binocular, SEM, microtomography) and geochemical analyses (PIXE, SEM-EDS, ED-XRF, EPMA, LA-ICP-MS). Elemental analyses rule out the hypothesis of an origin from a meteoritic impact (i.e. identification as tektites). Most of the artefacts have an andesitic composition (<63% SiO2), which appears to be unique among ‘massive’ glasses. The only artefact with a rhyolitic composition has been traced back to the Guadeloupe's Volcan du Tuf, where glassy fragments have been collected and analysed. The geological source of the other vitreous artefacts that exhibit an andesitic composition could be from a sublocal subduction-arc volcanism (maybe from Martinique), although no volcanic vitreous material of this kind has ever been reported worldwide. These results once again highlight the regional mobility of Early Ceramic populations and the production of standard lithic products using a highly original, albeit low-quality, local lithic resource, and provide valuable references for future identification of similar materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeometry
Archaeometry 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance. The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信