{"title":"初始条件对使用 CF$$_{\\textrm{3}}$I、CO$$_{\\textrm{2}}$$ 和 H$_{\\textrm{2}}$O 对 H$_{\\textrm{2}$-O$_{\\textrm{2}}$/air 起爆的抑制过程的影响","authors":"A. Dahake, R. K. Singh, A. V. Singh","doi":"10.1007/s00193-024-01172-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unwarranted leakage/release of hydrogen gas from metal processing, automotive, petrochemical industries, and nuclear reactors, along with its subsequent ignition and transition to detonation, could lead to catastrophic damage to both life and property. The development of practical hazard prevention and safety control systems demands an understanding of the effectiveness of the chemical inhibitors to suppress/mitigate a detonation wave under varying operational conditions. In the current study, the inhibition efficiency of chemical inhibitors under varying mixture initial conditions was investigated using numerical computations. The inhibition efficiency of trifluoroiodomethane (CF<span>\\(_{\\textrm{3}}\\)</span>I), carbon dioxide (CO<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}})\\)</span>, and steam (H<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}}\\)</span>O) on hydrogen-oxygen/air mixtures was evaluated using a detailed chemical kinetic model for hydrogen oxidation. ZND computations were carried out over a range of initial mixture composition, pressure, and temperature. It was found that CF<span>\\(_{\\textrm{3}}\\)</span>I is a better inhibitor than CO<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}}\\)</span> and H<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}}\\)</span>O at all the initial mixture conditions. However, at very high temperatures, the inhibitors CF<span>\\(_{\\textrm{3}}\\)</span>I, CO<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}}\\)</span>, and H<span>\\(_{\\textrm{2}}\\)</span>O have a similar detonation inhibition efficiency. The inhibition efficiency of carbon dioxide and steam is comparable and significantly lower than CF<span>\\(_{\\textrm{3}}\\)</span>I. The findings from the current work can be used to design optimized detonation safety systems over a range of practical operating conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"34 :","pages":"167 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of initial conditions on the inhibition process of H\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)–O\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)/air detonations using CF\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{3}}\\\\)I, CO\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\), and H\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)O\",\"authors\":\"A. Dahake, R. K. Singh, A. V. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00193-024-01172-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The unwarranted leakage/release of hydrogen gas from metal processing, automotive, petrochemical industries, and nuclear reactors, along with its subsequent ignition and transition to detonation, could lead to catastrophic damage to both life and property. The development of practical hazard prevention and safety control systems demands an understanding of the effectiveness of the chemical inhibitors to suppress/mitigate a detonation wave under varying operational conditions. In the current study, the inhibition efficiency of chemical inhibitors under varying mixture initial conditions was investigated using numerical computations. The inhibition efficiency of trifluoroiodomethane (CF<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{3}}\\\\)</span>I), carbon dioxide (CO<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}})\\\\)</span>, and steam (H<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)</span>O) on hydrogen-oxygen/air mixtures was evaluated using a detailed chemical kinetic model for hydrogen oxidation. ZND computations were carried out over a range of initial mixture composition, pressure, and temperature. It was found that CF<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{3}}\\\\)</span>I is a better inhibitor than CO<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)</span> and H<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)</span>O at all the initial mixture conditions. However, at very high temperatures, the inhibitors CF<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{3}}\\\\)</span>I, CO<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)</span>, and H<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{2}}\\\\)</span>O have a similar detonation inhibition efficiency. The inhibition efficiency of carbon dioxide and steam is comparable and significantly lower than CF<span>\\\\(_{\\\\textrm{3}}\\\\)</span>I. The findings from the current work can be used to design optimized detonation safety systems over a range of practical operating conditions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shock Waves\",\"volume\":\"34 :\",\"pages\":\"167 - 180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shock Waves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01172-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-024-01172-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
金属加工、汽车、石油化工和核反应堆中氢气的泄漏/释放,以及随后的点火和过渡到爆炸,可能会对生命和财产造成灾难性的破坏。实际危害预防和安全控制系统的发展需要了解化学抑制剂在不同操作条件下抑制/减轻爆震波的有效性。本研究采用数值计算的方法研究了不同混合初始条件下化学抑制剂的缓蚀效果。采用详细的氢氧化化学动力学模型,评价了三氟碘甲烷(CF \(_{\textrm{3}}\) I)、二氧化碳(CO \(_{\textrm{2}})\))和蒸汽(H \(_{\textrm{2}}\) O)对氢氧/空气混合物的抑制效率。ZND计算在初始混合物成分、压力和温度的范围内进行。在所有初始混合条件下,CF \(_{\textrm{3}}\) I都是比CO \(_{\textrm{2}}\)和H \(_{\textrm{2}}\) O更好的抑制剂。然而,在非常高的温度下,抑制剂CF \(_{\textrm{3}}\) I, CO \(_{\textrm{2}}\)和H \(_{\textrm{2}}\) O具有相似的爆轰抑制效率。二氧化碳和蒸汽的抑制效率可与CF媲美,且显著低于CF \(_{\textrm{3}}\) I.目前工作的发现可用于在一系列实际操作条件下设计优化的爆轰安全系统。
Effect of initial conditions on the inhibition process of H\(_{\textrm{2}}\)–O\(_{\textrm{2}}\)/air detonations using CF\(_{\textrm{3}}\)I, CO\(_{\textrm{2}}\), and H\(_{\textrm{2}}\)O
The unwarranted leakage/release of hydrogen gas from metal processing, automotive, petrochemical industries, and nuclear reactors, along with its subsequent ignition and transition to detonation, could lead to catastrophic damage to both life and property. The development of practical hazard prevention and safety control systems demands an understanding of the effectiveness of the chemical inhibitors to suppress/mitigate a detonation wave under varying operational conditions. In the current study, the inhibition efficiency of chemical inhibitors under varying mixture initial conditions was investigated using numerical computations. The inhibition efficiency of trifluoroiodomethane (CF\(_{\textrm{3}}\)I), carbon dioxide (CO\(_{\textrm{2}})\), and steam (H\(_{\textrm{2}}\)O) on hydrogen-oxygen/air mixtures was evaluated using a detailed chemical kinetic model for hydrogen oxidation. ZND computations were carried out over a range of initial mixture composition, pressure, and temperature. It was found that CF\(_{\textrm{3}}\)I is a better inhibitor than CO\(_{\textrm{2}}\) and H\(_{\textrm{2}}\)O at all the initial mixture conditions. However, at very high temperatures, the inhibitors CF\(_{\textrm{3}}\)I, CO\(_{\textrm{2}}\), and H\(_{\textrm{2}}\)O have a similar detonation inhibition efficiency. The inhibition efficiency of carbon dioxide and steam is comparable and significantly lower than CF\(_{\textrm{3}}\)I. The findings from the current work can be used to design optimized detonation safety systems over a range of practical operating conditions.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.