{"title":"利用航空弹性特征对导数计算的辅助和直接方法进行广义扑翼可靠性分析","authors":"Sandeep Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s11012-024-01807-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article presents physics based time invariant generalized flutter reliability approach for a wing in detail. For carrying flutter reliability analysis, a generalized first order reliability method (FORM) and a generalized second order reliability method (SORM) algorithms are developed. The FORM algorithm requires first derivative and the SORM algorithm requires both the first and second derivatives of a limit state function; and for these derivatives, an adjoint and a direct approaches for computing eigen-pair derivatives are proposed by ensuring uniqueness in eigenvector and its derivative. The stability parameter, damping ratio (real part of an eigenvalue), is considered as implicit type limit state function. To show occurrence of the flutter phenomenon, the limit state function is defined in conditional sense by imposing a condition on flow velocity. The aerodynamic parameter: slope of the lift coefficient curve (<span>\\(C_{L}\\)</span>) and structural parameters: bending rigidity (<i>EI</i>) and torsional rigidity (<i>GJ</i>) of an aeroelastic system are considered as independent Gaussian random variables, and also the structural parameters are modeled as second-order constant mean stationary Gaussian random fields having exponential type covariance structures. To represent the random fields in finite dimensions, the fields are discretized using Karhunen–Loeve expansion. The analysis shows that the derivatives of an eigenvalue obtained from both the adjoint and direct approaches are the same. So the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of flutter velocity will be the same, irrespective of the approach chosen, and it is also reflected in CDFs obtained using various reliability methods based on adjoint and direct approaches: first order second moment method, generalized FORM, and generalized SORM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":695,"journal":{"name":"Meccanica","volume":"59 5","pages":"761 - 791"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalized flutter reliability analysis with adjoint and direct approaches for aeroelastic eigen-pair derivatives computation\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11012-024-01807-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The article presents physics based time invariant generalized flutter reliability approach for a wing in detail. For carrying flutter reliability analysis, a generalized first order reliability method (FORM) and a generalized second order reliability method (SORM) algorithms are developed. The FORM algorithm requires first derivative and the SORM algorithm requires both the first and second derivatives of a limit state function; and for these derivatives, an adjoint and a direct approaches for computing eigen-pair derivatives are proposed by ensuring uniqueness in eigenvector and its derivative. The stability parameter, damping ratio (real part of an eigenvalue), is considered as implicit type limit state function. To show occurrence of the flutter phenomenon, the limit state function is defined in conditional sense by imposing a condition on flow velocity. The aerodynamic parameter: slope of the lift coefficient curve (<span>\\\\(C_{L}\\\\)</span>) and structural parameters: bending rigidity (<i>EI</i>) and torsional rigidity (<i>GJ</i>) of an aeroelastic system are considered as independent Gaussian random variables, and also the structural parameters are modeled as second-order constant mean stationary Gaussian random fields having exponential type covariance structures. To represent the random fields in finite dimensions, the fields are discretized using Karhunen–Loeve expansion. The analysis shows that the derivatives of an eigenvalue obtained from both the adjoint and direct approaches are the same. So the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of flutter velocity will be the same, irrespective of the approach chosen, and it is also reflected in CDFs obtained using various reliability methods based on adjoint and direct approaches: first order second moment method, generalized FORM, and generalized SORM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meccanica\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"761 - 791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meccanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11012-024-01807-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meccanica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11012-024-01807-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章详细介绍了基于物理学的机翼时不变广义扑翼可靠性方法。为进行扑翼可靠性分析,开发了广义一阶可靠性方法(FORM)和广义二阶可靠性方法(SORM)算法。FORM 算法需要一阶导数,而 SORM 算法则需要极限状态函数的一阶和二阶导数;对于这些导数,通过确保特征向量及其导数的唯一性,提出了计算特征对导数的辅助方法和直接方法。稳定参数阻尼比(特征值的实部)被视为隐式极限状态函数。为显示扑翼现象的发生,通过对流速施加条件,在条件意义上定义了极限状态函数。气动参数:升力系数曲线斜率(\(C_{L}\))和结构参数:气动弹性系统的弯曲刚度(EI)和扭转刚度(GJ)被视为独立的高斯随机变量,结构参数也被建模为具有指数型协方差结构的二阶常均值静态高斯随机场。为了在有限维度上表示随机场,使用卡尔胡宁-洛夫展开法对随机场进行离散化。分析表明,用邻接法和直接法得到的特征值的导数是相同的。因此,无论选择哪种方法,扑翼速度的累积分布函数(CDF)都是相同的,这一点也反映在使用基于邻接法和直接法的各种可靠性方法(一阶二矩法、广义 FORM 和广义 SORM)得到的 CDF 中。
Generalized flutter reliability analysis with adjoint and direct approaches for aeroelastic eigen-pair derivatives computation
The article presents physics based time invariant generalized flutter reliability approach for a wing in detail. For carrying flutter reliability analysis, a generalized first order reliability method (FORM) and a generalized second order reliability method (SORM) algorithms are developed. The FORM algorithm requires first derivative and the SORM algorithm requires both the first and second derivatives of a limit state function; and for these derivatives, an adjoint and a direct approaches for computing eigen-pair derivatives are proposed by ensuring uniqueness in eigenvector and its derivative. The stability parameter, damping ratio (real part of an eigenvalue), is considered as implicit type limit state function. To show occurrence of the flutter phenomenon, the limit state function is defined in conditional sense by imposing a condition on flow velocity. The aerodynamic parameter: slope of the lift coefficient curve (\(C_{L}\)) and structural parameters: bending rigidity (EI) and torsional rigidity (GJ) of an aeroelastic system are considered as independent Gaussian random variables, and also the structural parameters are modeled as second-order constant mean stationary Gaussian random fields having exponential type covariance structures. To represent the random fields in finite dimensions, the fields are discretized using Karhunen–Loeve expansion. The analysis shows that the derivatives of an eigenvalue obtained from both the adjoint and direct approaches are the same. So the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of flutter velocity will be the same, irrespective of the approach chosen, and it is also reflected in CDFs obtained using various reliability methods based on adjoint and direct approaches: first order second moment method, generalized FORM, and generalized SORM.
期刊介绍:
Meccanica focuses on the methodological framework shared by mechanical scientists when addressing theoretical or applied problems. Original papers address various aspects of mechanical and mathematical modeling, of solution, as well as of analysis of system behavior. The journal explores fundamental and applications issues in established areas of mechanics research as well as in emerging fields; contemporary research on general mechanics, solid and structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and mechanics of machines; interdisciplinary fields between mechanics and other mathematical and engineering sciences; interaction of mechanics with dynamical systems, advanced materials, control and computation; electromechanics; biomechanics.
Articles include full length papers; topical overviews; brief notes; discussions and comments on published papers; book reviews; and an international calendar of conferences.
Meccanica, the official journal of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, was established in 1966.