肺栓塞的导管介入治疗:机械血栓切除术与溶栓疗法

Q2 Medicine
Nicolas J. Mouawad
{"title":"肺栓塞的导管介入治疗:机械血栓切除术与溶栓疗法","authors":"Nicolas J. Mouawad","doi":"10.14797/mdcvj.1344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.","PeriodicalId":39207,"journal":{"name":"Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal","volume":"5 11","pages":"36 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolytics\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas J. Mouawad\",\"doi\":\"10.14797/mdcvj.1344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"36 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺栓塞是一种使人衰弱并可能危及生命的疾病,其特点是死亡率高和长期不良后果。传统的治疗方案存在严重的出血风险和血栓清除不彻底的问题,因此有必要开发创新的治疗策略。虽然新的介入治疗方法有望改善预后,减少严重并发症,但由于其发展迅速,且需要更多的临床对比证据,因此医生在众多治疗方案中为每位患者选择最佳治疗方法具有挑战性。本综述总结了目前已发表的用于肺栓塞的传统疗法和最新介入疗法的临床数据。虽然迄今为止已发表的研究表明这些较新的介入设备提供了安全有效的选择,但还需要更多的数据来了解它们相对于标准治疗方法的影响。本文回顾了正在进行的预计能提供所需证据的研究,因为这些研究对于帮助医生做出明智的治疗选择和推动必要的指南变更至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catheter Interventions for Pulmonary Embolism: Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Thrombolytics
Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信