咽和喉鳞状细胞癌患者同时接受化放疗时,预防性使用醋酸甲地孕酮与反应性使用醋酸甲地孕酮治疗临界体重减轻。

C. Lin, Pei-Wei Huang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Cheng-Lung Hsu, C. Liau, Shiang-Fu Huang, Chun-Ta Liao, T. Chang, Hung-Ming Wang
{"title":"咽和喉鳞状细胞癌患者同时接受化放疗时,预防性使用醋酸甲地孕酮与反应性使用醋酸甲地孕酮治疗临界体重减轻。","authors":"C. Lin, Pei-Wei Huang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Cheng-Lung Hsu, C. Liau, Shiang-Fu Huang, Chun-Ta Liao, T. Chang, Hung-Ming Wang","doi":"10.1080/01635581.2024.2352185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) prophylactic (p-MA) versus reactive (r-MA) use for critical body-weight loss (>5% from baseline) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC).\nPatients receiving CCRT alone in two phase-II trials were included for analyses. Both the p-MA and r-MA cohorts received the same treatment protocol at the same institution, and the critical body-weight loss, survival, and adverse event profiles were compared.\nThe mean (SD) weight loss was 5.1% (4.7%) in the p-MA cohort (n = 54) vs. 8.1% (4.6%) in the r-MA cohort (n = 50) (p = .001). The percentage of subjects with body-weight loss >5% was 42.6% in the p-MA cohort vs. 68.0% in the r-MA cohort (p = .011). Tube feeding was needed in 22.2% of p-MA vs. 62.0% of r-MA patients (p < .001). Less neutropenia (26.0% vs. 70.0% [p < .001]) and a shorter duration of grade 3-4 mucositis (2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [p = .009]) were observed with p-MA treatment. Disease-specific survival, locoregional control, or distant metastasis-free survival did not differ. Less competing mortality from secondary primary cancer resulted in a better overall survival trend in the p-MA cohort.\np-MA may reduce body-weight loss and improve adverse event profiles during CCRT for patients with PLSCC.","PeriodicalId":501691,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Cancer","volume":"34 49","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Versus Reactive Megestrol Acetate Use for Critical Body Weight Loss in Patients with Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"C. Lin, Pei-Wei Huang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Cheng-Lung Hsu, C. Liau, Shiang-Fu Huang, Chun-Ta Liao, T. Chang, Hung-Ming Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01635581.2024.2352185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) prophylactic (p-MA) versus reactive (r-MA) use for critical body-weight loss (>5% from baseline) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC).\\nPatients receiving CCRT alone in two phase-II trials were included for analyses. Both the p-MA and r-MA cohorts received the same treatment protocol at the same institution, and the critical body-weight loss, survival, and adverse event profiles were compared.\\nThe mean (SD) weight loss was 5.1% (4.7%) in the p-MA cohort (n = 54) vs. 8.1% (4.6%) in the r-MA cohort (n = 50) (p = .001). The percentage of subjects with body-weight loss >5% was 42.6% in the p-MA cohort vs. 68.0% in the r-MA cohort (p = .011). Tube feeding was needed in 22.2% of p-MA vs. 62.0% of r-MA patients (p < .001). Less neutropenia (26.0% vs. 70.0% [p < .001]) and a shorter duration of grade 3-4 mucositis (2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [p = .009]) were observed with p-MA treatment. Disease-specific survival, locoregional control, or distant metastasis-free survival did not differ. Less competing mortality from secondary primary cancer resulted in a better overall survival trend in the p-MA cohort.\\np-MA may reduce body-weight loss and improve adverse event profiles during CCRT for patients with PLSCC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition and Cancer\",\"volume\":\"34 49\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition and Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2352185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2024.2352185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了在晚期咽喉鳞状细胞癌(PLSCC)患者接受同期化放疗(CCRT)期间,醋酸甲地孕酮(MA)预防性(p-MA)和反应性(r-MA)治疗临界体重减轻(比基线减轻>5%)的效果。p-MA队列和r-MA队列在同一机构接受了相同的治疗方案,并对临界体重减轻、存活率和不良事件情况进行了比较。p-MA队列(n = 54)的平均(标清)体重减轻率为5.1%(4.7%),而r-MA队列(n = 50)的平均(标清)体重减轻率为8.1%(4.6%)(p = .001)。体重减轻>5%的受试者比例在p-MA队列中为42.6%,而在r-MA队列中为68.0%(p = .011)。22.2%的p-MA患者需要插管喂食,而62.0%的r-MA患者需要插管喂食(p < .001)。中性粒细胞减少率(26.0% vs. 70.0% [p<0.001])和3-4级粘膜炎持续时间(2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [p=0.009])均低于p-MA疗法。疾病特异性生存率、局部控制率或无远处转移生存率没有差异。p-MA可减少PLSCC患者在CCRT期间的体重减轻并改善不良反应情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylactic Versus Reactive Megestrol Acetate Use for Critical Body Weight Loss in Patients with Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
This study compared the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) prophylactic (p-MA) versus reactive (r-MA) use for critical body-weight loss (>5% from baseline) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC). Patients receiving CCRT alone in two phase-II trials were included for analyses. Both the p-MA and r-MA cohorts received the same treatment protocol at the same institution, and the critical body-weight loss, survival, and adverse event profiles were compared. The mean (SD) weight loss was 5.1% (4.7%) in the p-MA cohort (n = 54) vs. 8.1% (4.6%) in the r-MA cohort (n = 50) (p = .001). The percentage of subjects with body-weight loss >5% was 42.6% in the p-MA cohort vs. 68.0% in the r-MA cohort (p = .011). Tube feeding was needed in 22.2% of p-MA vs. 62.0% of r-MA patients (p < .001). Less neutropenia (26.0% vs. 70.0% [p < .001]) and a shorter duration of grade 3-4 mucositis (2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [p = .009]) were observed with p-MA treatment. Disease-specific survival, locoregional control, or distant metastasis-free survival did not differ. Less competing mortality from secondary primary cancer resulted in a better overall survival trend in the p-MA cohort. p-MA may reduce body-weight loss and improve adverse event profiles during CCRT for patients with PLSCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信