制度理由促使拉丁裔支持本土主义政策

Efrén O. Pérez, Ramona Alhambra, Joyce H Nguy, Olivia Bielskis, Leila Chabane, Andrea Gudino, Cameron Katz, Jamiel Liu, Emily Mojica, Mark Zhou
{"title":"制度理由促使拉丁裔支持本土主义政策","authors":"Efrén O. Pérez, Ramona Alhambra, Joyce H Nguy, Olivia Bielskis, Leila Chabane, Andrea Gudino, Cameron Katz, Jamiel Liu, Emily Mojica, Mark Zhou","doi":"10.1177/13684302241245383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Donald Trump’s presidency (2016–2020), political observers have rushed to explain why some Latinos support nativist policies that harm members of their own ethnic group. One hypothesis predicts that Latinos who value their American identity endorse policies that denigrate non-Americans, such as unauthorized immigrants. We propose system justification as an additional motive. Study 1 draws on a representative Latino oversample ( N = 3,950) in the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS). We show that higher system justification levels are substantively associated with support for harsher policies toward unauthorized immigrants, independently of American identity, partisanship, and other key covariates. Study 2 refines these results through a preregistered experiment with Latino adults ( N = 1,230). We evaluated system justification and American identity as mediators of support for anti-Latino policies in the domains of unauthorized immigration and affirmative action. Assignment to read about the vibrancy of the American dream (versus control) increased system justification motives, which then strongly boosted support for nativist policies. American identity played no meaningful role. Moreover, the mediated results for nativist policies were large and robust, but small and brittle for affirmative action. We discuss our results’ implications for the political psychology of Latinos—America’s largest ethnic group.","PeriodicalId":108457,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System justification drives Latino support for nativist policies\",\"authors\":\"Efrén O. Pérez, Ramona Alhambra, Joyce H Nguy, Olivia Bielskis, Leila Chabane, Andrea Gudino, Cameron Katz, Jamiel Liu, Emily Mojica, Mark Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13684302241245383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since Donald Trump’s presidency (2016–2020), political observers have rushed to explain why some Latinos support nativist policies that harm members of their own ethnic group. One hypothesis predicts that Latinos who value their American identity endorse policies that denigrate non-Americans, such as unauthorized immigrants. We propose system justification as an additional motive. Study 1 draws on a representative Latino oversample ( N = 3,950) in the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS). We show that higher system justification levels are substantively associated with support for harsher policies toward unauthorized immigrants, independently of American identity, partisanship, and other key covariates. Study 2 refines these results through a preregistered experiment with Latino adults ( N = 1,230). We evaluated system justification and American identity as mediators of support for anti-Latino policies in the domains of unauthorized immigration and affirmative action. Assignment to read about the vibrancy of the American dream (versus control) increased system justification motives, which then strongly boosted support for nativist policies. American identity played no meaningful role. Moreover, the mediated results for nativist policies were large and robust, but small and brittle for affirmative action. We discuss our results’ implications for the political psychology of Latinos—America’s largest ethnic group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241245383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241245383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自唐纳德-特朗普(Donald Trump)担任总统(2016-2020 年)以来,政治观察家们急于解释为什么一些拉美裔人支持伤害本族裔成员的本土主义政策。一种假设认为,重视美国身份的拉美人支持诋毁非美国人(如未经授权的移民)的政策。我们建议将制度合理性作为另一个动机。研究 1 利用了 2020 年多种族合作选后调查(CMPS)中具有代表性的拉美裔超样本(N = 3,950 人)。我们的研究表明,较高的制度合理性水平与支持对未经授权的移民采取更严厉的政策有实质性关联,而与美国人身份、党派和其他关键协变量无关。研究 2 通过对拉丁裔成年人(人数 = 1,230)进行预先登记的实验来完善这些结果。我们评估了在未经批准的移民和平权行动领域,制度合理性和美国身份认同对支持反拉美裔政策的中介作用。阅读有关美国梦的活力的文章(与对照组相比)增加了制度合理性动机,从而有力地推动了对本土主义政策的支持。而美国身份认同则没有起到任何作用。此外,对本土主义政策的中介结果是巨大而稳健的,但对平权行动的中介结果却是微小而脆弱的。我们将讨论我们的研究结果对拉美裔--美国最大的种族群体--政治心理学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System justification drives Latino support for nativist policies
Since Donald Trump’s presidency (2016–2020), political observers have rushed to explain why some Latinos support nativist policies that harm members of their own ethnic group. One hypothesis predicts that Latinos who value their American identity endorse policies that denigrate non-Americans, such as unauthorized immigrants. We propose system justification as an additional motive. Study 1 draws on a representative Latino oversample ( N = 3,950) in the 2020 Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey (CMPS). We show that higher system justification levels are substantively associated with support for harsher policies toward unauthorized immigrants, independently of American identity, partisanship, and other key covariates. Study 2 refines these results through a preregistered experiment with Latino adults ( N = 1,230). We evaluated system justification and American identity as mediators of support for anti-Latino policies in the domains of unauthorized immigration and affirmative action. Assignment to read about the vibrancy of the American dream (versus control) increased system justification motives, which then strongly boosted support for nativist policies. American identity played no meaningful role. Moreover, the mediated results for nativist policies were large and robust, but small and brittle for affirmative action. We discuss our results’ implications for the political psychology of Latinos—America’s largest ethnic group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信