超越工作场所相关问题:全球工会如何利用数字活动参与制定社会议程

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Michele Ford, Aim Sinpeng
{"title":"超越工作场所相关问题:全球工会如何利用数字活动参与制定社会议程","authors":"Michele Ford,&nbsp;Aim Sinpeng","doi":"10.1111/glob.12485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital information and communications technologies like social media are critical for trade union renewal. Yet, although many unions now use social media, there remain ongoing debates as to what effective digital activism looks like. This question is even more pressing for the Global Unions, as international labour movement organizations without grassroots members. Drawing on social movement and networked communication theories, this article interrogates Global Unions’ social media practices through a mixed-method analysis of 19,009 Facebook posts created between 2017 and 2022. Based on this analysis, we find that Global Unions that adopt crowd-focused communication styles and post on broader social issues have more success in engaging with online crowds than those that emphasize workplace or organizational issues and adopt top-down communication styles. At the same time, our findings challenge assumptions in the literature that crowd-led, connective communication styles associated with engagement are necessarily the most effective in today's digital society.</p>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glob.12485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond workplace-related issues: How Global Unions use digital activism to engage in social agenda-setting\",\"authors\":\"Michele Ford,&nbsp;Aim Sinpeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/glob.12485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Digital information and communications technologies like social media are critical for trade union renewal. Yet, although many unions now use social media, there remain ongoing debates as to what effective digital activism looks like. This question is even more pressing for the Global Unions, as international labour movement organizations without grassroots members. Drawing on social movement and networked communication theories, this article interrogates Global Unions’ social media practices through a mixed-method analysis of 19,009 Facebook posts created between 2017 and 2022. Based on this analysis, we find that Global Unions that adopt crowd-focused communication styles and post on broader social issues have more success in engaging with online crowds than those that emphasize workplace or organizational issues and adopt top-down communication styles. At the same time, our findings challenge assumptions in the literature that crowd-led, connective communication styles associated with engagement are necessarily the most effective in today's digital society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glob.12485\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体等数字信息和通信技术对于工会革新至关重要。然而,尽管许多工会现在都在使用社交媒体,但对于有效的数字活动是什么样的,仍然存在争论。作为没有基层会员的国际劳工运动组织,全球工会面临的这一问题更为紧迫。本文以社会运动和网络传播理论为基础,通过对2017年至2022年间创建的19009条Facebook帖子进行混合方法分析,对全球工会的社交媒体实践进行了探讨。基于这一分析,我们发现,与那些强调工作场所或组织问题并采用自上而下传播风格的全球工会相比,采用以人群为中心的传播风格并就更广泛的社会问题发帖的全球工会在与网络人群互动方面更为成功。同时,我们的研究结果也对文献中的假设提出了质疑,即在当今的数字社会中,以人群为主导、与参与相关的联系性传播方式一定是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond workplace-related issues: How Global Unions use digital activism to engage in social agenda-setting

Beyond workplace-related issues: How Global Unions use digital activism to engage in social agenda-setting

Digital information and communications technologies like social media are critical for trade union renewal. Yet, although many unions now use social media, there remain ongoing debates as to what effective digital activism looks like. This question is even more pressing for the Global Unions, as international labour movement organizations without grassroots members. Drawing on social movement and networked communication theories, this article interrogates Global Unions’ social media practices through a mixed-method analysis of 19,009 Facebook posts created between 2017 and 2022. Based on this analysis, we find that Global Unions that adopt crowd-focused communication styles and post on broader social issues have more success in engaging with online crowds than those that emphasize workplace or organizational issues and adopt top-down communication styles. At the same time, our findings challenge assumptions in the literature that crowd-led, connective communication styles associated with engagement are necessarily the most effective in today's digital society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信