舌咽神经髓质切断术后持续存在的呼吸放电模式

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Gijnovefa Kola , Eriko Hamada , Rishi R. Dhingra , Frank J. Jacono , Thomas E. Dick , Denise Dewald , Kingman P. Strohl , Thomaz Fleury-Curado , Mathias Dutschmann
{"title":"舌咽神经髓质切断术后持续存在的呼吸放电模式","authors":"Gijnovefa Kola ,&nbsp;Eriko Hamada ,&nbsp;Rishi R. Dhingra ,&nbsp;Frank J. Jacono ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Dick ,&nbsp;Denise Dewald ,&nbsp;Kingman P. Strohl ,&nbsp;Thomaz Fleury-Curado ,&nbsp;Mathias Dutschmann","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shape and size of the nasopharyngeal airway is controlled by muscles innervated facial, glossopharyngeal, vagal, and hypoglossal cranial nerves. Contrary to brainstem networks that drive facial, vagal and hypoglossal nerve activities (FNA, VNA, HNA) the discharge patterns and origins of glossopharyngeal nerve activity (GPNA) remain poorly investigated. Here, an <em>in situ</em> perfused brainstem preparation (n=19) was used for recordings of GPNA in relation to phrenic (PNA), FNA, VNA and HNA. Brainstem transections were performed (n=10/19) to explore the role of pontomedullary synaptic interactions in generating GPNA. GPNA generally mirrors FNA and HNA discharge patterns and displays pre-inspiratory activity relative to the PNA, followed by robust inspiratory discharge in coincidence with PNA. Postinspiratory (early expiratory) discharge was, contrary to VNA, generally absent in FNA, GPNA or HNA. As described previously FNA and HNA discharge was virtually eliminated after pontomedullary transection while an apneustic inspiratory motor discharge was maintained in PNA, VNA and GPNA. After brainstem transection GPNA displayed an increased tonic activity starting during mid-expiration and thus developed prolonged pre-inspiratory activity compared to control. In conclusion respiratory GPNA reflects FNA and HNA which implies similar function in controlling upper airway patency during breathing. That GPNA preserved its pre-inspiratory/inspiratory discharge pattern in relation PNA after pontomedullary transection suggest that GPNA premotor circuits may have a different anatomical distribution compared HNA and FNA and thus may therefore hold a unique role in preserving airway patency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent glossopharyngeal nerve respiratory discharge patterns after ponto-medullary transection\",\"authors\":\"Gijnovefa Kola ,&nbsp;Eriko Hamada ,&nbsp;Rishi R. Dhingra ,&nbsp;Frank J. Jacono ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Dick ,&nbsp;Denise Dewald ,&nbsp;Kingman P. Strohl ,&nbsp;Thomaz Fleury-Curado ,&nbsp;Mathias Dutschmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Shape and size of the nasopharyngeal airway is controlled by muscles innervated facial, glossopharyngeal, vagal, and hypoglossal cranial nerves. Contrary to brainstem networks that drive facial, vagal and hypoglossal nerve activities (FNA, VNA, HNA) the discharge patterns and origins of glossopharyngeal nerve activity (GPNA) remain poorly investigated. Here, an <em>in situ</em> perfused brainstem preparation (n=19) was used for recordings of GPNA in relation to phrenic (PNA), FNA, VNA and HNA. Brainstem transections were performed (n=10/19) to explore the role of pontomedullary synaptic interactions in generating GPNA. GPNA generally mirrors FNA and HNA discharge patterns and displays pre-inspiratory activity relative to the PNA, followed by robust inspiratory discharge in coincidence with PNA. Postinspiratory (early expiratory) discharge was, contrary to VNA, generally absent in FNA, GPNA or HNA. As described previously FNA and HNA discharge was virtually eliminated after pontomedullary transection while an apneustic inspiratory motor discharge was maintained in PNA, VNA and GPNA. After brainstem transection GPNA displayed an increased tonic activity starting during mid-expiration and thus developed prolonged pre-inspiratory activity compared to control. In conclusion respiratory GPNA reflects FNA and HNA which implies similar function in controlling upper airway patency during breathing. That GPNA preserved its pre-inspiratory/inspiratory discharge pattern in relation PNA after pontomedullary transection suggest that GPNA premotor circuits may have a different anatomical distribution compared HNA and FNA and thus may therefore hold a unique role in preserving airway patency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻咽气道的形状和大小由支配面神经、舌咽神经、迷走神经和舌下神经的肌肉控制。与驱动面神经、迷走神经和舌下神经活动(FNA、VNA、HNA)的脑干网络相反,对舌咽神经活动(GPNA)的放电模式和起源的研究仍然很少。本文使用原位灌注脑干制备物(n=19)记录 GPNA 与膈神经(PNA)、FNA、VNA 和 HNA 的关系。对脑干进行横断(n=10/19),以探索桥髓突触相互作用在产生 GPNA 中的作用。GPNA 通常反映了 FNA 和 HNA 的放电模式,并显示出相对于 PNA 的吸气前活动,随后是与 PNA 一致的强吸气放电。与 VNA 相反,FNA、GPNA 或 HNA 通常不存在吸气后(早期呼气)放电。如前所述,髓质横断后,FNA 和 HNA 放电几乎消失,而 PNA、VNA 和 GPNA 仍保持呼吸暂停吸气运动放电。脑干横断后,GPNA 在呼气中期开始显示出增强的强直活动,因此与对照组相比,吸气前活动时间延长。总之,呼吸 GPNA 反映了 FNA 和 HNA,这意味着它们在呼吸过程中控制上呼吸道通畅性的功能相似。在桥髓横断后,GPNA 保留了与 PNA 相对的吸气前/吸气放电模式,这表明 GPNA 前运动回路的解剖分布可能与 HNA 和 FNA 不同,因此可能在保护气道通畅方面发挥独特作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistent glossopharyngeal nerve respiratory discharge patterns after ponto-medullary transection

Shape and size of the nasopharyngeal airway is controlled by muscles innervated facial, glossopharyngeal, vagal, and hypoglossal cranial nerves. Contrary to brainstem networks that drive facial, vagal and hypoglossal nerve activities (FNA, VNA, HNA) the discharge patterns and origins of glossopharyngeal nerve activity (GPNA) remain poorly investigated. Here, an in situ perfused brainstem preparation (n=19) was used for recordings of GPNA in relation to phrenic (PNA), FNA, VNA and HNA. Brainstem transections were performed (n=10/19) to explore the role of pontomedullary synaptic interactions in generating GPNA. GPNA generally mirrors FNA and HNA discharge patterns and displays pre-inspiratory activity relative to the PNA, followed by robust inspiratory discharge in coincidence with PNA. Postinspiratory (early expiratory) discharge was, contrary to VNA, generally absent in FNA, GPNA or HNA. As described previously FNA and HNA discharge was virtually eliminated after pontomedullary transection while an apneustic inspiratory motor discharge was maintained in PNA, VNA and GPNA. After brainstem transection GPNA displayed an increased tonic activity starting during mid-expiration and thus developed prolonged pre-inspiratory activity compared to control. In conclusion respiratory GPNA reflects FNA and HNA which implies similar function in controlling upper airway patency during breathing. That GPNA preserved its pre-inspiratory/inspiratory discharge pattern in relation PNA after pontomedullary transection suggest that GPNA premotor circuits may have a different anatomical distribution compared HNA and FNA and thus may therefore hold a unique role in preserving airway patency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信