从过敏角度看 "气候友好型 "饮食。

Allergologie select Pub Date : 2024-05-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5414/ALX02471E
Imke Reese
{"title":"从过敏角度看 \"气候友好型 \"饮食。","authors":"Imke Reese","doi":"10.5414/ALX02471E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the EAT-Lancet Commission's call for a change in diet towards more plant-based foods, especially protein sources, this so called \"Planetary Health Diet (PHD)\" has been widely discussed. While for some the reduction in animal foods is not enough and vegan diets are advocated to save the climate, others are sounding the alarm that the reduction is too drastic and that the PHD makes it impossible to provide a diet that meets our needs (of essential nutrients). In addition to climate aspects, health benefits often cited to justify the PHD do not take into account that vegetarians/vegans differ from the general population by far more factors than the reduction or elimination of animal foods. Also not sufficiently discussed is the fact that a diet which excludes or severely restricts animal foods is also associated with health risks if critical nutrients are not adequately covered. Moreover, the challenge of meeting protein requirements is underestimated by many. The food industry has responded to the trend towards more plant-based foods by massively expanding the range of highly processed or ultra-processed vegan foods. These - vegan or not vegan - are suspected of being partly responsible for the development of non-communicable diseases. In addition to general criticism regarding the usefulness of advertising the PHD, the replacement of animal protein sources with plant-based sources notably harbors a number of additional relevant risks for allergy sufferers so that the latter should be classified as an unfavorable target group for the implementation of the PHD recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101298,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie select","volume":"8 ","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Climate-friendly\\\" diets from an allergy point of view.\",\"authors\":\"Imke Reese\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/ALX02471E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the EAT-Lancet Commission's call for a change in diet towards more plant-based foods, especially protein sources, this so called \\\"Planetary Health Diet (PHD)\\\" has been widely discussed. While for some the reduction in animal foods is not enough and vegan diets are advocated to save the climate, others are sounding the alarm that the reduction is too drastic and that the PHD makes it impossible to provide a diet that meets our needs (of essential nutrients). In addition to climate aspects, health benefits often cited to justify the PHD do not take into account that vegetarians/vegans differ from the general population by far more factors than the reduction or elimination of animal foods. Also not sufficiently discussed is the fact that a diet which excludes or severely restricts animal foods is also associated with health risks if critical nutrients are not adequately covered. Moreover, the challenge of meeting protein requirements is underestimated by many. The food industry has responded to the trend towards more plant-based foods by massively expanding the range of highly processed or ultra-processed vegan foods. These - vegan or not vegan - are suspected of being partly responsible for the development of non-communicable diseases. In addition to general criticism regarding the usefulness of advertising the PHD, the replacement of animal protein sources with plant-based sources notably harbors a number of additional relevant risks for allergy sufferers so that the latter should be classified as an unfavorable target group for the implementation of the PHD recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergologie select\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"199-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergologie select\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02471E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02471E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从 EAT-Lancet 委员会呼吁人们改变饮食习惯,多吃植物性食物,尤其是蛋白质,这种所谓的 "行星健康饮食(PHD)"就引起了广泛的讨论。有些人认为减少动物性食物还不够,提倡素食以拯救气候,而另一些人则提出警告,认为减少动物性食物的幅度过大,"行星健康饮食(PHD)"不可能提供满足我们需要(必需营养素)的饮食。除了气候方面的问题,人们经常引用健康益处来证明 PHD 的合理性,但却没有考虑到素食者/纯素食者与普通人的不同之处远不止于减少或不吃动物性食物。同样没有得到充分讨论的是,如果关键营养素没有得到充分保证,排除或严格限制动物食品的饮食也会带来健康风险。此外,许多人低估了满足蛋白质需求所面临的挑战。食品行业为了应对人们更多食用植物食品的趋势,大量扩大了高度加工或超加工纯素食品的范围。这些食品--无论是否纯素--被怀疑是导致非传染性疾病的部分原因。除了对宣传《健康数据》的实用性的普遍批评之外,用植物性蛋白质来源取代动物性蛋白质来源显然对过敏症患者隐藏着一些额外的相关风险,因此后者应被归类为实施《健康数据》建议的不利目标群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Climate-friendly" diets from an allergy point of view.

Since the EAT-Lancet Commission's call for a change in diet towards more plant-based foods, especially protein sources, this so called "Planetary Health Diet (PHD)" has been widely discussed. While for some the reduction in animal foods is not enough and vegan diets are advocated to save the climate, others are sounding the alarm that the reduction is too drastic and that the PHD makes it impossible to provide a diet that meets our needs (of essential nutrients). In addition to climate aspects, health benefits often cited to justify the PHD do not take into account that vegetarians/vegans differ from the general population by far more factors than the reduction or elimination of animal foods. Also not sufficiently discussed is the fact that a diet which excludes or severely restricts animal foods is also associated with health risks if critical nutrients are not adequately covered. Moreover, the challenge of meeting protein requirements is underestimated by many. The food industry has responded to the trend towards more plant-based foods by massively expanding the range of highly processed or ultra-processed vegan foods. These - vegan or not vegan - are suspected of being partly responsible for the development of non-communicable diseases. In addition to general criticism regarding the usefulness of advertising the PHD, the replacement of animal protein sources with plant-based sources notably harbors a number of additional relevant risks for allergy sufferers so that the latter should be classified as an unfavorable target group for the implementation of the PHD recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信